The Hindu Woman: Life under the Laws of Manu

Authors Avatar

India is one of the most rapidly developing democracies in the world, but in human rights issues it lags far behind western ideals. India’s predominant religion, Hinduism, had its beginnings two and a half millennia ago and many rituals and rules instituted in ancient times have remained stagnant in the rapidly changing country (Keay, 2000:133). Archaic writings still partition contemporary society and condemn many to exclusion, abuse and subjugation based on their position at birth. Nearly half of India’s people are mandated lesser beings because they were born female.

A fundamental component of Hinduism is dharma which translates as “that which upholds or supports” (Leslie, 1989:23). It defines what one does and what one must do; both the real and the ideal. Dharma describes and prescribes specific actions based on an individual’s position in the universe. These obligations are one’s religious and moral duties, a ‘righteousness’, that when performed facilitate liberation from the constant cycle of rebirth (Radhakrishnan, 1948:104-108). The conditions of one’s dharma are laid out in the Dharmaśāstra, a voluminous sacred text revered so highly it is often considered the fifth Veda (Radhakrishnan, 1948:105). The Laws of Manu, composed around 200 C.E., is a dharmic law code for every caste, class, stage of life, and occupation in Hindu society (Keay, 2000:27).

From this code emerge two perspectives regarding the position of women in Hindu society. The first presents the Indian woman as a symbol of purity and faithfulness, someone who “must be honoured and adorned by their fathers, brothers, husbands, and brothers-in-law, who desire (their own) welfare” (Laws of Manu 3.55; Buhler, trans.). The code also ordains that “in childhood a female must be subject to her father, in youth to her husband, when her lord is dead to her sons… a woman must never be independent” (Laws of Manu 5.148; Buhler, trans.). From the view of a western scholar these codes may seem contradictory: how can an oppressed woman treated as a piece of property also be honoured and respected (Singh, 1996:v)? But from a Hindu perspective it is only those women who abandon their desires and independence and willingly submit and dedicate themselves to the men in their lives who are able to receive this honour and adornment. These dichotomous treatises complement each other; one could not exist without the other.  

Codifying Female Injustices

This relegation to an inferior position has not always been the reality for Hindu women. From all available accounts, in the early Vedic period it appears that women occupied the same position as men (Andal, 2002:20). However, even then, the birth of a girl was less appreciated than that of a boy (Patil & Patil, 1996:111).  Women reached a high standard of learning and culture; some of the Vedic poets were women.  Women held property rights, participated in social and religious rituals, and were employed in a number of professions.∗  Later, in the Smitris, the period when social and religious laws were codified, women lost their esteemed status. Manu, the composer of the Laws of Manu, both praised women and denigrated them to the lowest point of Hindu society. It was this codification that ultimately concretized the severe repression of Hindu women:

“It is Manu’s code that has had the most negative effects, forging unbreakable shackles on Indian women for countless succeeding generations. Even today, it is his laws which keep millions helpless in the prison of Hindu orthodoxy. Manu for the first time legally assigned to women her definite place in the scale of society. But his laws reflect a conflict even within himself… He averred that a mother is more to be revered than a thousand fathers, yet his laws place women socially on a level with the lowest of all groups in Aryan society, the Sudra” (Das & Quayson, 1932:27-28).

Over time the role of women became increasingly more restricted. Women could no longer receive an education and they were excluded from religious rituals and from learning the Vedic texts. Women lost all rights to wealth and personal property, including their own body. Marriage became compulsory and virginity was deemed so essential that many young girls were married before they reached puberty. Social freedom was eradicated; a woman was restricted to the household of her husband and became his property. A woman became a liability and when her husband died she became a burden for his family (Andal, 2002:23-29).  It was shortly after the Laws of Manu were written, around 300 C.E., that the practice of sati, or voluntary widow immolation, developed (Altekar, 1962:120). This was considered one of the most honourable things a woman could do.

Join now!

The Lifecycle of a Hindu Woman

        In the Hindu family, female infants are generally considered unwelcome: “the birth of a girl grant it elsewhere, here grant a son” (Atharva Veda 6:2-3, Griffith, trans). It is shameful to not marry off a daughter, but to do so involves payment of a hefty dowry.  In poor families this is often not possible (Gatwood, 1985:85).  Rather than risk shame or further poverty many poor families chose to poison or starve their infant daughters (Bumiller, 1990:105). Sons are desired because they will be able to support the family monetarily, and to take care ...

This is a preview of the whole essay