• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15

The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each from a different perspective; functionalist, radical feminist, liberal feminist and Marxist feminist

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each from a different perspective; functionalist, radical feminist, liberal feminist and Marxist feminist. Anna Pollert's study on working class women's factory experiences from a Marxist feminist perspective and Dobash and Dobash's study of the phenomenon of marital violence against women from the radical feminist perspective will be evaluated. The constraints of all four studies also will be detailed with the intent to discover the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective. Gender is contentious area of study and as such there are various competing theories, which attempt to extract the true essence of its meaning. When evaluating these theories, it is important to recognise that a collection of all four theories can be used together to gain an insight and understanding into gender. Gender can be described as the designated role allocated to males or females at birth in which, dependent on the sex of an individual and their culture, the individuals are expected to conform to. The expected roles of males and females differ from culture to culture. Gender is culturally learned behaviour and therefore culturally relative. A common sense assumption is that an individual's biological sex is intrinsic to that of their gender. However, some sociologists now base their analysis of sex and gender, on the supposition that there are distinct differences between the two. The sex of most individuals can be determined by the biological differences between the male and the female - physical characteristics such as chromosomes, hormones and genitals - which will categorise them accordingly. These characteristics are often mistaken to pre-determine the gender of an individual - the extent, to which these genetic characteristics actually influence an individual's behaviour, is unclear. Therefore, gender should not necessarily be predicted by the sex of an individual, as this could be a stereotypical assessment. (Moore, 2001, page 27) ...read more.

Middle

Women on the other hand, are bound by the conventions and responsibilities of being selfless mother. Women often stayed in the relationship because of the children (keeping the family together), but left the relationship for the same reason (detrimental for the children). Low-self esteem, brought by the consistency of emotional abuse, often gives women a distorted view of themselves whereby they presume that they are worthless; this ensures the feeling of predetermined failure if they leave. (Handout, informal interviews, page 36) Dobash and Dobash argue that historically via legal, literary and religious writings, women have always been documented as 'mothers' 'wives' or 'daughters' and that as such, have never been extended the opportunity to become a significant individual in their own right. For example, in Leviticus, God told Moses that a man is worth 50 sheikels and a woman worth 30. Women were traditionally denied the opportunity to read, write and participate in politics. They have been portrayed as insignificant throughout history, and as a result gain prestige, not by their own achievements, but rather from the male figure, to which they are affiliated. Therefore, women have had little choice but to enter marriage and become the property of their husband. This process is still evident today, as after marriage a woman will assume her husbands name. (Marsh, 1998, page 210) Society has preserved this traditional attitude by ensuring the socialisation process persuades women to perform accordingly - promoting and accepting and their predetermined roles, as devoted wife and selfless mother. As such, escalating any further up the 'food chain' presents significant problems for a woman and would be perceived as unsuitable behaviour - especially if she has children. As many women themselves are opposed to women working after having children. Women have been and continue to be, weighed down by the socially constructed obligation to serve men first and foremost. Women, therefore become dependant on their roles as 'wife and mother' for recognition as an individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

The constraints of this study can be viewed as Pollert's middle class background, as her perceptions of factory life could be tainted by her own set of values and norms from her middle class culture, which are inclined to vary throughout different classes. Situations, which were perceived as unacceptable by Pollert, may be understood and accepted by women from the working class background and this could induce an ideological bias from the researcher. Limitations were set by management as to who Pollert was allowed to interview and the questions that Pollert could ask the women who were allowed to be interviewed. Also under scrutiny would be the fact that only one factory, one class and one ethnicity were researched and this could present a problem when attempting to generalise the researchers findings. In conclusion, it would appear that gender does not automatically coincide with the biological sex of an individual. Displaying the traditional 'masculine' or 'feminine' characteristics of the male or female sex may be biological as the functionalists would suggest, but could have been created and reinforced via the socialisation process and with interaction in society as an adult. A significant portion of any individual's behaviour may be socially constructed which also pertains to the gender aspect of behaviour and therefore it is difficult to interpret - even in infancy - whether girls are naturally caring, considerate or emotional and boys inherently, active, unemotional and rational. The unequal nature of modern society continues to hold the male sex and gender characteristics in a superior light and until society changes to recognise and alter this perception, both males and females may continue to live in conflict, with neither given the opportunity to truly explore themselves and open up the possibilities of self-actualisation. Both men and women are confined to the rigidity of traditional Western culture, which imposes its guidelines upon society denying both the chance to test the 'greener grass'. When evaluating the theories, which attempt to ascertain the essence of gender; a collaboration of all theories should be taken into consideration to extend a fuller more balanced conclusion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    outline and evaluate feminist contributions to our understanding of gender

    4 star(s)

    Feminists felt that the 'scientific' methods used by men could not help understand society. In the 1970's, Liberal Feminist, Ann Oakley introduced the unstructured interview as the technique to gain in depth 'real' information about women and their experiences but this was criticised as it was said that Oakley got

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    Then on to secondary socialisation this is usually taught by more external influences on a bigger scale such as; schools, religion also local governing bodies such as the police then one of the biggest influences the media. (3) Both functionalist and Marxists agree that this is how the individual identity

  1. Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family

    Murdock ignores family diversity and Parsons ignores variation in the family such as different ethnic groups view on the family.

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Marx argues religion is the "Opium of the people," and is an illusion, which eases the pain of exploitation and oppression. The poor are placed in a state of false consciousness through a process of socialisation. Religion eases the pain of oppression of the working class by a number of ways.

  1. What are the basic elements of Feminism? What are the differences between liberal and ...

    Feminists want to develop human choices as they maintain that the cultural perception of gender, divides the full range of human qualities into two opposing and limited spheres: the female world of emotion and cooperation and the male world of rationality and competition.

  2. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    It wouldn't take long for an employer to realise that the worker they have taken on is in fact not as well educated as their qualifications would make out they were, but had received favouritism at school due to class status and in fact could not do the job as

  1. Rationale - I have decided to study the gender-oriented issue of conjugal roles in ...

    I was then able to compare data to get a gender version of the amount of tasks done. My experience of carrying out the research compares to the interpretivists. Firstly, the task of the researcher is to investigate how those taking part in the study interpret the world around them.

  2. Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research.

    Qualitative research was considered by a number of respondents to take longer and cost more than quantitative research, although others felt they could only undertake qualitative research because they did not have the resources to carry out qualitative studies. Qualitative data were identified as less easy to digest and open to both undervaluing and reinterpretation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work