• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The 'social constructionism versus essentialism' debate cannot be avoided when we study gender and sexuality." Discuss this statement in relation to at least one of the perspectives covered in part 1 of the module.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The 'social constructionism versus essentialism' debate cannot be avoided when we study gender and sexuality." Discuss this statement in relation to at least one of the perspectives covered in part 1 of the module. Gender and sexuality, though terms taken somewhat for granted, have caused much controversy in where they have derived from. Although some advocate the social constructionism approach, others prefer that of the essentialist: questioning whether humans are biologically programmed or social influences have formed these aspects of their personality. This has been debated through many years of history, by psychologists, sociologists and sexologists amongst others; and still no solid conclusion has been drawn. However, in considering this argument, it is necessary to consider the definitions of these two terms, which in itself is a topic of mixed views, and related to the initial conflict. Essentialists believe that sexuality and gender are both naturally or biologically assigned to each individual. If the problem of gender is considered first, the terms 'sex' and 'gender' are of the same meaning. This is accepted widely in everyday life, as 'children are assigned to one or the other gender on the basis...of their sex organs' (Delamont, S. ...read more.

Middle

If a female is promiscuous, she is branded with derogatory terms whereas males are not. It is also suggested that heterosexuality is the norm, and that 'non-heterosexual men and women have been traditionally viewed as problematic' (Weeks, J. et al. 2001. P.138). It has been argued that this is again due to biological differences, which is the essentialist view, dependant on the sex of the individual. Kraft-Ebbing was one such essentialist who thought 'of sex as an all-powerful instinct which demands fulfillment' (Weeks, J. 1989. P.24). However, even through history in Western society, the norms of sexuality have changed. From the fourteenth to the seventeenth centuries women were persecuted for having sexual desires, being labelled witches, and relating it to being mentally unstable. Promiscuity was described as an illness of the womb and as such the appropriately named hysterectomy was used to abolish what was termed women's hysteria. Even in Victorian times, women's sexuality was oppressed; it was only after this they began to become sexually liberated. As men are thought to be more aggressive generally, this extends to the bedroom, where men are expected to initiate sexual behaviour, although both parties are required to partake in the act of heterosexual copulation. ...read more.

Conclusion

1980. P.15). The relationship between sex and gender extends to sexuality immediately with the ambiguity of the word 'sex', which can connote the act of copulation or ones physiological attributes with relation to gender. This implies a direct relationship immediately, but how far can it be assumed that sexuality is dependent on gender? To this question there are two aspects, firstly the difference between men and women in the way they are perceived with relation to their sexual habits, and secondly with respect to sexual orientation. On both these parts, the large part of the evidence discussed suggests the social constructionist argument is stronger, however again important biological factors cannot be ignored, such as the necessity of reproduction which can only take place with heterosexuality present. It is for these reasons that the debate of essentialism versus social constructionism is relevant with respect to both gender and sexuality. As long as society accepts that sex is implies ones gender and sex hormones dictate ones sexuality and new evidence is produced to support the argument that society defines them, this will continue. Although based on the evidence discussed it seems that both are largely socially constructed, to take them as 'a purely social construct with no physiological basis is scientifically dangerous' (Treadwell, P. 1987. P.259). However, it seems to be the case that the 'normal' will 'take precedence over the natural' (Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. P.8). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. "Age is a social construct". How far do you agree with this statement?

    The mental side of old age includes loss of memory, reduction in reckless physical courage and in sexual desire, impairment of puzzle and problem-solving ability, and reduced willingness to be adventurous. Women experience a specific transition, menopause, which ceases the ability to bear children and the menstruation cycle will stop.

  2. What makes debate surrounding masculinity so contentious?

    I am in agreement with the definition given by Paul Robinson that masculinity is a socially constructed project that is inherently resistant to broad generalizations across time and space.

  1. In what ways is the concept of gender useful in the study of ancient ...

    That is, the 'Panathenaic' procession was based on the myth of the origin of Ericthonius, who was associated with Athens. Hephaistos spilt semen on Athena's lap, which she wiped off with some wool, but consequently Ericthonius was born. The child was then given to Cecrops' daughters, but two of them,

  2. How important is the relation between a person's occupation and his or her identity?

    At this stage in development a childs identity is Christopher Neill Y312545X 'essentialist' in that it is heavily stereotyped with no grey areas as a child searches for certainty in his or her identity. Indeed, v Biology, strangely enough, is a factor that comes into play later in child development.

  1. The Corporate Social Responsibility Debate

    Credibility with stakeholders is a determinant of a company's viability and eventually leads to increased profits [Davis, 2005]. CEO of Hubbard's Foods Ltd, Dick Hubbard, has been a representative on the executive of New Zealand Businesses for Social Responsibility and the New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development [Hubbard Foods, 2001].

  2. classifications and social identity What have you learnt thus far about your identity and/or ...

    The notion of social identity is individuals' labelling of themselves as members of particular groups -- such as Nation, Social class, Subculture, Ethnicity, Gender, Employment, and so forth. It is in this sense which sociologists and historians speak of a national identity of a particular country, and feminist and queer theorists speak of gender identity.

  1. The essay will begin by looking at what normality and social construction is and ...

    They need to be adapted to fit the world as it is. If this is not possible, then they should be hidden away in a specialised institution where there basic needs are met (Barnes et al, 1999). The emphasis is on dependence, supported by the stereotypes of disability that call forth pity, fear and patronising attitudes.

  2. Coursework prose study

    The Vendetta is set in southern Italy, due to a family feud the main female character loses her only son due to a knife attack by Nicholas Ravolati who escaped the following night to the isle of Sardinia. The widow vows to avenge her son's death and trains her dog

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work