• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and will incorporate an evaluation of the functionalist and Marxist perspectives

Extracts from this document...


The purpose of this essay is to describe four different sociological perspectives on 'race'. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and will incorporate an evaluation of the functionalist and Marxist perspectives with the intent to discover the strengths and weakness of both studies. Sociologists have presented their various competing theories with regards to the controversial issue of 'race', in an attempt to understand the phenomenon of 'racial' issues. The term 'race' is used to provide distinction between the different human populations throughout the world; this distinction was initially thought to be determined by the biological differences between 'races' and consequently, this terminology is most commonly used to segregate and categorise individuals according to their visual characteristics, such as skin colour, facial features and hair types. 'Race' became a popular term in the 19th century, and various explanations accumulated pertaining to the different 'races' of people that compose the world, with the most common segregation emerging between the 'black' and 'white' races. Subsequently, an individual's physical appearance and the supposedly distinct differences in their biological composition became the fundamental basis for this categorisation - a categorisation that typically maintained 'white' superiority. (Race - definitions Handout) Nott and Gliddon in their 1854 publication of "Types of Mankind" stated that Caucasians, (mainly European) "have in all ages been the rulers", thus suggesting that Caucasians were the only 'race' of humans sufficiently capable of establishing and maintaining a civilised democratic society. Dark skinned races were therefore viewed as "only fit for military governments". This was a common belief, shared by many influentials of this era, which left behind a legacy of controversy regarding 'race' and its connotations. (Haralambos, 2005, page 201) Despite the fact that since the 1940's, evolutionary scientists have rejected the supposition that 'race' is defined by biological differences and subsequently this belief has no scientific foundation - its legacy continues to exist, deluding many individuals within society regarding their views on 'racial' differences, which are more often than not, based from a prejudice view, programmed by a history of comparable attitudes. ...read more.


The indigenous working class, no longer feels indispensable and subsequently this produces a deep contempt for the immigrants to whom they defensively 'label' as inferior. Castles and Kosack suggest that the friction and division contained within one class, protects and maintains ruling class domination. (Haralambos, 2000, page 221) As the hostility from indigenous to immigrant grows, the frequency at which the immigrants are targeted escalates, and subsequently the immigrants become the cause of all problems within society. The strengthening of ruling class authority occurs as a result of the discrimination and prejudice that immigrants are confronted by on their arrival into the migrant country, which regardless of the duration of their stay, does not appear to readily dilute, leaving friction between the indigenous and the immigrants. In effect, immigrants are used to detract attention and focus away from the real issue - a failing capitalist system. Blame in thrust upon the immigrant, for housing shortages and unemployment, as opposed to targeting the government regarding such issues. This has the 'knock on' effect of shielding the state from deterioration as political parties, such as the British National Party advocate for the removal of ethnic minorities from the UK - fighting against immigration as opposed to fighting for equality and against the capitalist economic system. (Race as an aspect of social class Handout - page 135) Castles and Kosack's study of "Immigrant Workers and Class Structure", illustrates the importance of the international capitalist economic structure, and the implications of this unequal structure, regarding racial disharmony. This study also highlights the similarities between the indigenous proletariat and the immigrant, outlining the justifiable underlying principle for categorising both groups in the same stratification. Castles and Kosack extend significant insight into the rational behind the formation of prejudice and discrimination towards the immigrant workers, illustrating that it is a defence mechanism created by the capitalist system to protect and maintain its existence which is then implemented by the indigenous working class to maintain their own security. ...read more.


Pryce's study highlights the validity of Ethnology, as there is are clear division of cultures among the West Indian community, concluding that the pre-judgment and classification of individuals of the same ethnic origin have little validity. (Haralambos, 2000, page 231) In conclusion, it would appear that the issue of 'race' and the implications for whose not categorised as the 'superior white race', are still very much relevant in today's society. The study's, which are described in this essay, are approximately thirty years old, and perhaps to small degree dated, in terms of progression within society, thus one would surmise that race issues have been diluted through the passing of time. However, there is still a vast amount of current documentation to support that 'racism' is still very much a part of the British culture. For example a recent televised documentary tested the extent to which racism still exists, and discovered that discrimination specifically within the employment area and attempting to secure accommodation, is still prevalent in today's society. When attempting to understand the explanation for such discrimination and sometimes hatred towards those of a different ethnic origin, acknowledgment of the historical documentation, depicting irrational beliefs pertaining to the inferior 'races', is in this writer's opinion, the most valid explanation. The 'race situation' has in effect 'snowballed' to cause a large division between the 'black' and 'white' populations. The cultural differences between 'races' must also be recognised as a significant factor; however, racism still exists for those who conform to the dominant culture. The Capitalist structure within society could be perceived as the instigating factor, and explanation for the identification of an inferior 'race' for further exploitation and capital gain. It would appear that in order to achieve a balanced sociological understanding of race, its foundations, connotations, and possible solution to the segregation, which still remains in modern society, a broad range of sociological perspectives and theories should be taken into consideration. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the Functionalist and Marxist views of society.

    5 star(s)

    Functionalism is based on consensus whereas Marxism is based on the notion of conflict. Marx believed what ultimately shaped society and in turn controlled the individual, was the economy and all the other social institutions that were influenced by it.

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Malinowski instead believes that the role of religion in society is to provide for the individual in times of emotional stress. He argues that people turn to religion in what are known as "life crises", birth, death, marriage and puberty.

  1. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    However according to Marxism equality and freedom within the employer-employee relationship is an illusion since workers are forced to work for the capitalist in order to survive. Therefore workers are not free as they can merely exchange one form of 'wage slavery' for another.

  2. Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Views on Society and Education.

    A Marxist believes that the infrastructure shapes the rest of the society. They believe that a small privileged class owns the society and that the laws are made in the interest of the wealthy. This contrasts with the functionalist beliefs, they see society as a system and that all parts

  1. The Fundamental Differences Between Functionalism, Marxism and Social Action Theory.

    It seems to lead the proletariats to believe that if they overcome the hierarchy Bourgeoise they can eventually attain the same material rewards. The Marxist view is very deterministic in the way that it sees society as a system. They believe that we are labelled as soon as we are born, mother, son, father, Dr, Lawyer etc.

  2. Compare and contrast Marxist and Functionalist accounts of religion.

    Religion works to show sense in contradictory scenarios that threaten the balance of ultimate beliefs. For instance, a man who is profiting through the doing of evil will be punished in the after life for his wrongful gain in life.

  1. Social structure today has 4 main components: status, roles, groups, and institutions. Each ...

    For instance, if a student has to go to work for an emergency, he is faced with the decision of whether to study for the next day's exam or go to work and not risk being fired.

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    RECIPES - Garfinkel means the strategies used to pull interactions together to make sense of interactions. Like the "how to do it" knowledge. People will make sense of a situation or become frustrated by it, as they may not understand what is going on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work