• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Underachievement

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Underachievement can be defined in several ways. The sub-group have chosen to define underachieving pupils as: 'pupils who are not disruptive or badly behaved, nor probably, amongst the most able pupils. They are seen as co-operative, often quiet and not problematic in either the academic or social sense. However, this profile means that they may become anonymous within the classroom and thus under-perform in relation to their academic potential.' Working with this definition means that the sub-group has not concerned itself with pupils with special educational needs or the most able pupils, although they note that it is possible for any group of pupils to underachieve. The problem of the academic underachievement of girls has been highlighted by researchers who have examined sex differences in the outcomes of school and higher education since the 1970s and explored how females experience learning (Paechter 1998). Maleness and education was not seen as a problem and many aspects of masculinity went unresearched (Connell 1989, 1995). Over the last ten years there has been a dramatic shift from initial concern about the attainment of girls to a growing concern about the underachievement of boys (Gender & Education 1997, International Journal of Inclusive Education 1998). ...read more.

Middle

Other factors in child-rearing may play a part in the different language capacities of girls and boys. Young girls play social games, for example with dolls, that fosters language development. Boys more active play, for example with toy cars, may encourage spatial learning but only language of the 'Vroom, vroom' kind. Boys keenness for computers may only encourage low level repetitive gaming with little use of extended, elaborate or syntactical language. In the playground girls spend more time talking than boys, and in family life may be given more responsibility for social tasks and looking after siblings. Gender preferences in learning styles may also be a contributing factor, girls being more compliant, or as one teacher put it: 'they are just more teachable than boys'. However it is in the area of boys attitudes to schooling that the problem seems to be most intractable (Head 1999). Whether due to nature or nurture girls respond more readily to what they are asked to do, whether it is schoolwork or homework. Boys tend to be more disruptive and 'off-task' in the classroom, although disruptive behaviour is by no means gender specific. ...read more.

Conclusion

and the 'real Englishmen' (REM). The NE were working class boys who wanted to be self-employed, and the REM were disaffected middle class boys. It is possible that such groups have always existed in UK schools, but were not recognised. Male behaviour even today can be taken for granted, and summarised in unreflective generalisations such as the following from a teacher in a west London school referring to the lack of motivation for writing shown by her working class boys: 'Well they are boys aren't they, what can you expect?' Traditionally the working man was a father, husband and breadwinner. With increasing numbers of lone-parent families, over 90% of which are headed by women, these roles are closed to many men. And boys growing up in these families lack the role models of father, husband and breadwinner. Lone-parent, mother-headed families are concentrated in the lower working class. Growing up in such families are concentrated in the lower working class. Growing up in such families can threaten traditional working-class masculine identities (Jackson,1988) So it can be concluded that from 1970 to 1990 boys were achieving better academically then girls. However, from 1997 onwards girls have started to thrive much better then boys. ?? ?? ?? ?? Eisho simon Sociology h/w 24/11/04 Assess the view that boys are underachieving ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. I want to investigate the concept of the relative academic failure of working class ...

    David Hargreaves research along with Paul Willis' study "Learning to Labour" conducted in 1977 will provide me with sufficient background information to accurately conduct a worthy investigation. He provides one explanation for this social phenomenon by using an ethnographic and interactionalist approach he attempts to understand the meanings pupils give to their schooling in particularly pro and anti school subcultures.

  2. Is working class underachievement better explained by factors inside or outside the school?

    Working classes tend to emphasise collectivism rather than individualism. Hyman says that most middle class occupations provide more than one opportunity and chance for advancement, which includes income and status; this contributes towards a better future and lifestyle. Where as within working class occupations there are less chances and opportunities to better themselves such as the chances of promotion.

  1. To try and find out why girls are outperforming boys in GCSEexaminations?

    periods, which would enable them to study even more as they would have lessons instead of free periods! Question three: 'Do you attend school regularly?' I thought that from this question I would get a fairly equal response, but again the results I got differed from my original thought.

  2. Investigate the concept of the academic failure of working class boys, as it is ...

    This is a valuable study and relates well to my work as Willis focused strictly on males. However, Willis' study only provides the basis for the extremes of male behaviour in school e.g. pro or anti. He doesn't provide any explanation on what comes in between he largely ignores the other subcultures that develop within schools.

  1. Investigate and determine why girls tend to achieve higher grades than boys at key ...

    Education between boys and girls and shows how sexes affect grades at Key Stage 4 and this is the basis of this investigation. Other factors, rather than sexes affect how well girls do, such as gender. This is described in the 'GCSE Sociology: Social Life' book, by Dave Longmate and Grahame Coates.

  2. Aborigines in Australia.

    aid to only the "full-bloods" and "half-castes" hence all non-full bloods below 34 year old were expelled and left to fend for themselves in mainstream society while those that can afford 20 pounds re-admission fee were allowed to return, which was most unlikely (Tatz 24).

  1. Tackling Gender Underachievement in Literacy and Numeracy.

    It is normal for young children to spontaneously play in single sex groups and this can be considered as an early introduction into the single sex peer groups that will dominate in later life.

  2. How Adolescent Boys and Girls View Today's Computer Culture.

    Lack of female role models, gender-stereotyped computer course materials, and male-oriented names of computer science courses also contributed to students' existing connotation of computers as male domains (Schofield, 1995). The trend continued at the university level where, in an introductory computer course, more than half the males used the computer

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work