• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"We cannot understand work apart from society and historical change."

Extracts from this document...


2001HUM International Change and the Social World Assessment Item 1: Essay "We cannot understand work apart from society and historical change." This purpose of this essay is to outline the stark contrasts between traditional, pre-industrial and industrial societies to work. It will show how work is inexorably interconnected with society and how historical change has led to our understanding of work today. In traditional societies, such as those of the pre-colonial, Australian Aboriginals, there was no concept of money, or work for either profit or accumulation. (Reynolds: 1981) They lived their lives as survival dictated. There was no wage-labour, no separation of work from non-work (Reynolds: 1981) and no concept of time or work, presumably because these two concepts are so closely related. (Thompson: 1967) In traditional Orokaivan society, there was not even a generic term for work. (Schwimmer: 1980) Similarly, there was also no equivalent to the word leisure, as leisure's meaning is derived from 'time off' from work. (Study Guide: 2003) Industrial societies are just the opposite, with a major emphasis on surplus production, profits and time and work. There is wage-labour, a generic word for work and a clear segregation of work from non-work. In fact, it is by these three things that humans define themselves in industrial societies. ...read more.


What's more, in traditional societies these 'work' tasks were usually carried out on a needs-only basis. (Reynolds: 1981) This includes the needs of society (i.e., neighbours, friends, kin) with whom all spoils obtained would be shared. In early colonial Australia one observer stated: "The value of economic incentives was further undermined by the reciprocity and egalitarianism of Aboriginal society. Increased wages awarded for improved efficiency were immediately shared with kin whether they were employed or not. 'It is difficult... for Aborigines to understand individualism,' stated another." (Reynolds: 1981) Marx believed that it was the advent of Capitalism during the Industrial Revolution that changed collective attitudes and ideas about work forever. In traditional societies, Marx defined work as "those activities necessary not only for the provision of individual needs of all members of society, including non-labourers, but also for the maintenance of production and society" (Study Guide: 2003). Conversely, a Marxist definition of a Capitalist is "someone who earns from the surplus value of others. I.e., business owners who use the labour of others to make a profit" (Murray: 2003). From the industrial society emerged Capitalists, who invested their resources in order to increase them. The context of work being necessary for providing "individual needs" was changed forever, as Capitalists bought up the means of production, leaving non-capitalists with only one way of maintaining their survival and quality of life: selling their labour power. ...read more.


What they see as their role in society - to sell labour to capitalists - defines them. These people only understand work in this way - pre-industrial and traditional work attitudes are such a vast departure from modern industrial society, that their concepts of work cannot even be imagined to exist today. And though labour unions may spend a lot of time attempting to improve the conditions of their work, the 'labourer is what I am' concept has become so ingrained, these people are rarely seen attempting to become capitalists themselves. They want more money, yes, but not by exploiting the labour of others - that is their role. In conclusion, it becomes clear that we cannot understand work apart from society and historical change. Traditional societies, do not understand the Industrial concept of 'work'; they do what needs to be done to both sustain and fulfil them. Traditional societies measure time in a different fashion also, as they base their 'time' around seasonal changes. The current understanding of work has come about through historical changes taking place from 1760 onwards, roughly culminating in two major shifts: the industrial revolution and the emergence of Capitalism. From these came prevailing ideas that proclaim the importance and equivalence of time and money, shaping society as we see it today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Evaluate the Significance of Socilogy To Understand Social Work Practice.

    They leave their families behind and live in properties that they plan to spend the rest of their lives in. When and if it comes to a time that they become 'incapacitated' it is common that they are often left isolated from their communities with no support from families.

  2. Primary Sources and Social Change in the industrial revolution

    "I have three children working in Wilson's mill; one 11, one 13, and the other 14. They work regular hours there. We don't complain. If they go to drop the hours, I don't know what poor people will do. We have hard work to live as it is.

  1. What Civil Society Can Do to Develop Democracy

    In many countries around the world, individuals provide such help pro bono - that is, people volunteer their assistance or services without pay. Even in countries where charity assistance tops 500 million dollars annually, millions of people volunteer their time to make the system work.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    This analyses, though, can never tell us whether or not we should be communists; no science can. Strictly empirical analysis can provide a solution to a problem only where it is a question of a means adequate to the realization of an absolutely unambiguous end.

  1. Media, leisure & fashion - Britain in the 1930's.

    They also affected public opinion and were thus an important tool for anyone who wanted to manipulate public opinion. Television sets, although available in the 1930s, were very expensive, and so instead, children were kept entertained through comics. Paper making had undergone a technological revolution, with the use of wood

  2. Things Fall Apart - review

    Okonkwo is described as a "strong" man whose life is dominated by fear and anger. He has a slight stammer and uses his fists when words do not come quickly enough. Although Okonkwo was "not a man of thought but of action" (Achebe 69), he did consider that it was

  1. Aborigines in Australia.

    As such, these laws have been the subject of controversies and debate between the natives, politicians and major players in the farming and mining industry. In spite of such controversies and debates, however, the aborigines have learned to organized themselves into Land Councils to safeguard their lands from illegal claimants,

  2. Theory and Practice of Work with Young People

    Am I concerned with oppression and anti-oppressive practice? Much of what I and Nightstop as an agency do in our work involves enabling young people to live within a system that is discriminatory, unfair and biased towards a particular form of family ideology that suggests that young people should remain

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work