• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the points of conversion and the points of departure between science and social science? Explain with reference to the claim that the two sciences use scientific methods and state your opinion on this point.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TMA3 Question What are the points of conversion and the points of departure between science and social science? Explain with reference to the claim that the two sciences use scientific methods and state your opinion on this point. I will write in my essay about point of conversion and departure between science and social science? I also explain with reference to the claim that the two sciences use scientific methods and state my opinion on these points. What are the point of conversion and departure between science and social science? Are the two sciences above use scientific methods? What do we mean when we say that we know some thing? There are many different sources of the knowledge such as medicine which is part of the science, it depend on many factors, for example, personal experience of our own bodies, observation of others, our families, friends. Medical knowledge of the general practitioner, we expect the doctor to have access to expert knowledge. Evidence from "X-ray" diagnosis, experiments, observations, instruments, add new knowledge to the patient and the doctor. Another source of knowledge is the language and practices that create knowledge. The specialist language of the doctor produces meaning that has medically recognized status, such language is increasingly entering into the discourses of common sense. The doctor has specialized medical knowledge that the patient lacks. The specialized knowledge is a collection of evidence and theories about how they can best be treated. ...read more.

Middle

They were excluded from other areas of public life, from higher education. Table 1.2 different theorists' approaches to knowledge. Table 1.2 Popper Kuhn Foucault Fox Keller How do we produce knowledge? Questions Skepticism Falsification Paradigms Discourse Scientific method and practice What is the status of knowledge? 'True science' knowledge which survives falsification Paradigms have status until challenged and replaced Knowledge is power Discourses create power and knowledge together Scientific knowledge is not objective Men have more power and status than women How is new knowledge produced? Through constant questioning Social change leads to revolutionary crises Discourses of resistance Challenges claims to objectivity Is this knowledge socially constructed? Knowledge is rationally constructed by human beings Scientific knowledge is influenced by social change and is social in content Heavy stress on social construction There is no 'truth' outside discourse Knowledge production is gendered and shaped by social power relations such as partiarcy There are different forms of knowledge and that some knowledge systems might be privileged in particular societies, while scientific knowledge can be seen as replacing religious knowledge, there is no evidence that, for instance, near knowledge systems are challenging the orthodoxy of traditional medical science, especially in its application though the practice of medicine, people are seeking alternative ways of knowing about health and illness, who are the experts now. Is there greater uncertainty about scientific forms of knowledge in the contemporary world? At different points in history there have been different ideas about the source of authority. ...read more.

Conclusion

They focus on the research context the power relation and structural inequalities in society. They see research as linked to struggle against oppression of workers by controllers of capital. The use same methods as positivist and interprettivists, but deploy these to contribute to the emancipation of the oppressed or to understand some form of exploitation. critical researchers raise questions about the impact of prevailing power structures on the research process and findings. Finally, is cultural perspective, they focus on language, representative and discourse. Knowledge is linked with power. Cultural approaches make two representational practice and language and how we understand and make sense of the world. The notion of discourse and the links between knowledge and power. Social science is complex science, search for reliable, try to use best means to reach for the right and truth, gave their opinion without any intervention or biases, they take their information from many resources such as narrative stand and analytical stand, the analytical stand uses the circuit of knowledge to examine the process by which we come to say that we know something. The narrative stand explores the nature of knowledge itself and how it is not constant but forever changing. In my opinion this approach is excellent and powerful, help in many fields of our life to solve complex problem, or help when the person want to write article, because it's analytical method, help to reach to what we need to understand. Social science helps and makes the ways easy to study the other parts of science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Is sociology a science?

    Douglas believed family and friends were likely to be reluctant to admit the possibility of suicide and will, if necessary, seek to cover it up. He also felt Durkheim could not treat all suicides as the same type of

  2. Sociology is not, cannot be, and should not be a science.

    I have highlighted circumstances wherby objective facts have been quantified with the use of scientific method, such use lends sociology to the definition of science mentioned above and can therfore be defined as science. In a painfully contradictory manner, I have highlighted with Kuhn's theory how science and sociology work

  1. Evaluation of the difference between Positivist and Interpretivist methodologies

    to cause his own personal influence on the respondents, as was done by Stanley Milgram5 in 1963 to demonstrate people's obedience to authority.[11] For the Phenomenologist qualitative data is more appropriate.

  2. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Marxism sees a conspiracy at every level of organisation in a capitalist soc. so that exploitation can continue. 2. Excessive reference to ideology may make arguments presented less acceptable + encourage a belief in the bias of the researchers. 3.

  1. The essay will begin by looking at what normality and social construction is and ...

    Images like the disabled child looking lost and forlorn and creating this pitiful feeling worked well for charitable causes. These images are based on the tragedy model of disability of what a shame, bring out feelings of what did I do wrong in disabled children.

  2. evaluation of methods

    Also my research is on the whole of UK, but I have only asked people in London and only from some areas. This means that this is not representive to the whole of population in UK. My results may not have been accurate because of the problems with my sampling and methods.

  1. This essay proposes to discuss different accounts of the welfare state by both mainstream ...

    care. (1997: 13) It can then be assumed, that many policies of the welfare state are at present, not geared towards Mc Laughlin and Glendinning's de-familisation. Feminists like Barnes (1997), Finch and Groves (1977), and Ungerson (1987), all articulate what they perceived to be equal opportunity issues raised by community care policies.

  2. Rawls claims that ‘utilitarianism does not take the distinction between persons seriously.’ Explain this ...

    class are considered, concluding that everyone despite their differences are to have equal liberty rights, this would show that Rawls had considered and respected the 'distinction between persons'. Under the difference principle all persons are again considered because all inequalities are to be advantageous to everyone including the worst off or those at the bottom of the social spectrum.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work