• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

What effects did World War One have on social classes?

Extracts from this document...


Tim Brooker AA312 R8413113 TMA 03 Question:- What effects did World War One have on social classes? This TMA question, like many before, poses a short, succinct question to which the answer is anything but. The first hurdle encountered is how we deal with what is meant by the term 'class'. There are also sub-divisions within a class, which may affect its status at the end of the war, such as religion, nationality, culture and gender, as well as whether it was on the victorious side, or not. The second deals with the many differing ideas on the nature and position of pre-war society. The use of the term 'class' when used under Marxist conditions makes a distinction between a class 'in itself' and 'for itself'. "A class was only considered fully mature when it recognised its own interests, which were in conflict with those of other classes, and acted for itself in support of these interests." (Unit 3 page 106). Neither this view of the term 'class' or Weber's version, which separates 'class' and 'status' are used in unit. Instead, it is defined by Arthur Marwick as 'social structure' or 'social stratification'. In each of the European countries the collective populations were separated into social groups by differing "levels of wealth, power, freedom of various sorts, and by different patterns of living conditions and cultural behaviour." (Unit 3 page 105). In order to ascertain the effects of world War one on social classes it is necessary to establish their positions pre-war to obtain the initial datum. ...read more.


There would also be less acceptable suitors to court the daughters of these families, and continue the line. These factors would inevitably combine to form the plutocracy mentioned in the unit. This ' watering down' of the aristocratic classes came about mostly by marriage. The heirs from the 'new money', upper middle class, whose families, through industrialisation and wartime manufacturing had made vast fortunes became upwardly mobile, - the first 'yuppies'. They began to intermix with the upper classes until they had infiltrated to such an extent that they became a new 'lower upper class', without the family lineage or great tracts of land, but with money and eligible bachelors. At the peak of the aristocratic class, and therefore all classes, are the royalty. Their position at the end of the war was pivotal upon whether they were on the side of the victors or the vanquished. Many of the European kings lost everything purely because they countries were aligned with Germany's cause. Of the victors, Russia's tsar stands out as being on the victorious side but still losing all due to the countries revolution. Along with the loss of the tsar the whole of the Russian aristocracy was either killed or forced into exile, and its lands divided up and given to the proletariat. The Russian aristocracy were not the only members of their class to see their lands either eroded or disappear, as the formation of new states in Europe at the end of the war and the movement of borders caused many of ...read more.


This transformation inevitable due to the nature of capitalism, was accelerated due to World War One, although those members of the Tim Brooker AA312 R8413113 TMA 03 aristocracy who retained most of their land and money managed, on the whole, to retain their power base, the war being a short, to medium term 'blip' in their fortunes. Eastern Europe saw larger post-war changes for both the upper and lower classes, but these were due more to the restructuring geographically of the region than reform. Russia was still in revolutionary turmoil at the end of the war, all members of all the classes were paying the price of revolution. As we have seen the effects of World War One on social classes varied due to many different factors. Generally the upper classes did not come out of the war as well as the lower classes, however, because the fundamental basic structures of society remained in place they were able to recover their positions of power. In post war industrialised Europe the upper classes would never enjoy the same extent of power over the middle and working classes though, as their importance and power had become recognised due to the 'total' nature of the war and would continue as the seeds of the 'mass society' had been sown. BIBLIOGROPHY Open University, AA312 Total War and Social Change: Europe 1914-1955, Primary Sources 1: World War 1. Book 1 Europe in 1914. Book 2 The Impact Of World War 1. Europe 1880-1945 J.M. Roberts ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Primary Sources and Social Change in the industrial revolution

    The "hands" are viewed as part of the production, not much different than the machines they operate. Bounderby himself views anyone that asks for more than they already have as wanting to dine "on turtle soup and venison with golden spoons" at his expense.

  2. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    Stratification means that society is made up of different unequal groups. The things that make up these groups tends to persist across generations, e.g. the media regularly talks about a "welfare" class, usually single parents who themselves were from a single parent household, or the position of women in society.

  1. How did the effects of the Industrial Revolution influence the ordinary lives of working ...

    Infact, these harsh working conditions and desperate times led to a resistance from the working classes and revolts. In 1848 for example, after years of enduring repeatedly awful working conditions, violent social unrest and marches took form in the 'Year of Revolution'.

  2. The Social Effects of the Industrial Revolution

    According to the data then available, "the annual mortality of England and Wales...was 1 in 40 in 1780; in 1801, it was 1 in 48; and in 1830, it had decreased to 1 in 58" (Doty 61). A decrease in mortality rates, as these numbers clearly point out, suggests that

  1. Has the restructuring of gender relations and employment led to a restructuring of European ...

    There exists a variety of theories of gender, which I argue shed some light on the historical account of male-female relations. The theory of Patriarchy focuses on the fact that throughout history, men have been dominant over women in all societies, and because social structures, values and beliefs tend to

  2. Has the restructuring of gender relations and employment led to a restructuring of European ...

    The changes that came about in and around the 1960's can be explained through Hakims Preference theory as explained in her article 'Women, Work and the Family in Europe'. She basis the differences in gender on five different factors: 1.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Technological and economic changes threaten stratification by status, and ''push class situation to the foreground.... Every slowing down of the change in economic stratification leads, in due course, to the growth or status structures and makes for a resuscitation of the important role of social honor'' (930).

  2. Women in the War.

    Within this discrimination there was further discrimination between the classes of women. They were expected to manage the house. People were aware of this and a group called the Suffragettes voiced the opinion that equality should be imposed. This all changed when war broke out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work