• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

What effects did World War One have on social classes?

Extracts from this document...


Tim Brooker AA312 R8413113 TMA 03 Question:- What effects did World War One have on social classes? This TMA question, like many before, poses a short, succinct question to which the answer is anything but. The first hurdle encountered is how we deal with what is meant by the term 'class'. There are also sub-divisions within a class, which may affect its status at the end of the war, such as religion, nationality, culture and gender, as well as whether it was on the victorious side, or not. The second deals with the many differing ideas on the nature and position of pre-war society. The use of the term 'class' when used under Marxist conditions makes a distinction between a class 'in itself' and 'for itself'. "A class was only considered fully mature when it recognised its own interests, which were in conflict with those of other classes, and acted for itself in support of these interests." (Unit 3 page 106). Neither this view of the term 'class' or Weber's version, which separates 'class' and 'status' are used in unit. Instead, it is defined by Arthur Marwick as 'social structure' or 'social stratification'. In each of the European countries the collective populations were separated into social groups by differing "levels of wealth, power, freedom of various sorts, and by different patterns of living conditions and cultural behaviour." (Unit 3 page 105). In order to ascertain the effects of world War one on social classes it is necessary to establish their positions pre-war to obtain the initial datum. ...read more.


There would also be less acceptable suitors to court the daughters of these families, and continue the line. These factors would inevitably combine to form the plutocracy mentioned in the unit. This ' watering down' of the aristocratic classes came about mostly by marriage. The heirs from the 'new money', upper middle class, whose families, through industrialisation and wartime manufacturing had made vast fortunes became upwardly mobile, - the first 'yuppies'. They began to intermix with the upper classes until they had infiltrated to such an extent that they became a new 'lower upper class', without the family lineage or great tracts of land, but with money and eligible bachelors. At the peak of the aristocratic class, and therefore all classes, are the royalty. Their position at the end of the war was pivotal upon whether they were on the side of the victors or the vanquished. Many of the European kings lost everything purely because they countries were aligned with Germany's cause. Of the victors, Russia's tsar stands out as being on the victorious side but still losing all due to the countries revolution. Along with the loss of the tsar the whole of the Russian aristocracy was either killed or forced into exile, and its lands divided up and given to the proletariat. The Russian aristocracy were not the only members of their class to see their lands either eroded or disappear, as the formation of new states in Europe at the end of the war and the movement of borders caused many of ...read more.


This transformation inevitable due to the nature of capitalism, was accelerated due to World War One, although those members of the Tim Brooker AA312 R8413113 TMA 03 aristocracy who retained most of their land and money managed, on the whole, to retain their power base, the war being a short, to medium term 'blip' in their fortunes. Eastern Europe saw larger post-war changes for both the upper and lower classes, but these were due more to the restructuring geographically of the region than reform. Russia was still in revolutionary turmoil at the end of the war, all members of all the classes were paying the price of revolution. As we have seen the effects of World War One on social classes varied due to many different factors. Generally the upper classes did not come out of the war as well as the lower classes, however, because the fundamental basic structures of society remained in place they were able to recover their positions of power. In post war industrialised Europe the upper classes would never enjoy the same extent of power over the middle and working classes though, as their importance and power had become recognised due to the 'total' nature of the war and would continue as the seeds of the 'mass society' had been sown. BIBLIOGROPHY Open University, AA312 Total War and Social Change: Europe 1914-1955, Primary Sources 1: World War 1. Book 1 Europe in 1914. Book 2 The Impact Of World War 1. Europe 1880-1945 J.M. Roberts ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    Small subcultures, Street culture for example can provoke different types of racism, which may not be aimed at a particular race. Due to the culture of the streets, there are many integrated groups, of no particular race so therefore Racism cannot be resisted by this type of culture and not to forget that some cultures influence racism.

  2. Primary Sources and Social Change in the industrial revolution

    If we look at another primary source from the same report another woman Hannah Goode, in the Nottinghamshire mill reports that "I work at Mr. Wilson's mill. I think the youngest child is about 7. I daresay there are 20 under 9 years.

  1. Invisible Man: A Universally Applicable Tale of One Man's Journey of Self-Discovery.

    but these two items are enough because the briefcase is filled with papers. He ignites the only documents he has connecting him with a past and an identity. "I started with my high-school diploma, applying one precious match with a feeling of remote irony, even smiling as I saw the swift but feeble light push back the gloom" (567).

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    And, if you pay people too little, their efficiency and attentiveness decreases. Thus, it would be better if labor were performed as if it were an absolute end in itself. This can only be the process of a long and arduous education (for example, being raised Pietist).

  1. How did the effects of the Industrial Revolution influence the ordinary lives of working ...

    Work generated income, which in turn provided them with the resources to live. There was however, as aforementioned, a parity of low wages, which often propelled the people to endure even longer working hours in their desperate attempts to make a living for themselves and their family.

  2. Is war really inevitable?

    The source and origin of inequality resides in the very characteristics that defines and distinguishes us as a human. The amount of diversity and distinction exists more in humans than any other species. Nationality, gender, race, social status are just some of the many things that are attributed to humans.

  1. Women During World War Two

    Like a ritual of Britain, class had a large affect on even what jobs women were to have. The lower (working) class women whose husbands/fathers were poorly paid manual workers, would have manual labour-directed jobs themselves, like working on farms, in factories, in the markets and driving busses.

  2. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    - ''Instead of people looking for jobs, there are jobs looking for ... 'suitable' people'' (Thurow 1972). Effects of Stratification on Organizations: -Theorists and researchers disagree about how hierarchy and inequality influence organizational effectiveness and individual well-being. -Weber and Durkheim - hierarchy is efficient and inevitable -Others associate hierarchy with alienation and pathological conformity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work