What evidence does Putnam offer for a decline in 'community' in America

Authors Avatar

What evidence does Putnam offer for a decline in ‘community’ in America?

In his book, ‘Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community’, Robert Putnam discusses ways in which Americans have disengaged from political involvement and civil organisations. Much of his reasoned writing is corroborated by a collation of graphs and figures to explain the quality of American community. In this essay I shall evaluate the proof offered by Putnam to support his claim that community is in a decline in the U.S. To do this I must first provide a working definition of ‘community,’ a term with wide implications and varied definitions depending on the context of its usage. Putnam uses it as a synonym for social capital, a qualitative investment to create higher social cohesion through a civic virtue, rather than to describe a specific structure within society. Social capital ‘refers to the collective value of all '' and the inclinations that arise from these networks to do things for each other’ according to  (Putnam, 1995. p.14). I will break down the idea of social capital into geographical locale and suburbanisation, association membership, acts of charity and religious affiliation to assess more easily Putnam’s evidence and suggest that community is not necessarily in decline, rather is adapting to a more modern pace of living.

Geographical proximity to others is a factor that has altered in recent American history and a factor which Putnam claims is detrimental to cultural capital. Many residents of larger cities no longer live and work in the same urban area, choosing instead to live in  and commute to work in other areas. From 1970 to 1990, more than 30,000 square miles of once-rural lands in the United States became urban, as classified by the U.S. Census Bureau (Associated Press, 1991). Otherwise known as suburbanisation or urban sprawl, Putnam is critical of this trend and goes so far as to call it ‘deadly for a community’ (Putnam, 2003).  He argues that as people live further from their place of work they spend more and more time commuting between the two, thus reducing the time they have to develop relationships and community ties at either end and creating a conflict of allegiance where it is unclear where you should be basing your community. IT and transportation developments have habitually been seen to lift people out of their reliance on local community and can further differentiate home life and work life from each other and from the wider community. Wirth predicted the major problems and dissatisfactions of people living in suburbs in the 1930s, arguing that they were becoming depersonalized, isolated and alienating, the lack of distance between people leading to a ‘melting-pot’ effect whereby primary relationships are broken down (Wirth, 1964). These ideas were taken up by Whyte who believed the suburbs attracted a particular type of person, a white-collar worker who transformed the suburb into the home of the alienated man.

Join now!

However, it could be argued that issues regarding a person’s place of residence remain at the heart of the population’s concerns, for example crime, child safety and property prices. Berger criticizes Whyte’s account, noting that it only relates to middle-class suburbs and gives no evidence to show that a shift in location causes people to adopt a new way of life (Berger, 1969). In opposition to the distain delivered to IT and transport, one could argue that developments in these fields actually facilitate the retention of social bonds. In this way, they would enhance social capital.

Although Putnam presents a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay