• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What has been the effect ofindustrialisationon the family?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What has been the effect of industrialisation on the family? Family relationships are always recognized within wider kinship groups. In virtually all societies we can identify what sociologists call the nuclear family, two adults living together in a household with their own or adopted children. In most traditional kinship network of some type. When close relatives other than a married couple and children live either in the same household or in the same close and continuous relationship with one another, we speak of an extended family. An extended family may include grandparents, brothers and their wives, sisters and their husbands, aunts and nephews. Before industrialisation there were a lot more extended families but after industrialisation there were a lot more nuclear families. Industrialisation refers to the emergence of mass production using machinery, based on the use of inanimate power resources (like steam or electricity). The family is viewed from all different angles which are based on the views of functionalists, feminists and Marxists just to name but a few. The American Sociologist Talcott Parsons who is a functionalist believes that the family only has two main functions left which are primary socialisation and personality stabilisation. ...read more.

Middle

During the 1970's and 1980's, feminist perspectives dominated most debates and research on the family. If previously the sociology of the family had focused on family structures, the historical development of the nuclear and extended family and the importance of kinship ties, feminism succeeded in directing attention inside families to examine the experiences of women in the domestic sphere. Feminists writings have emphasized a broad spectrum of topics and one of the central concerns which was explored in great depth was the way in which chores were allocated between members of a household. Among feminists there are differing opinions about the historical emergence of this division. While some feminists see it as an outcome of industrial capitalism, others claim that it is linked to patriarchy, and it predates industrialisation. There is some reason to believe that a domestic division of labour existed prior to industrialisation, but it seems clear that capitalist production brought about a much clearer distinction between the domestic and work realms. This process resulted in crystallisation of 'male spheres' and 'female spheres' and power relationships which are felt to this day. ...read more.

Conclusion

He didn't mean that all inequalities between individuals would disappear but the economic system would come under communal ownership and a more humane society than he knew at that present time would be established. Industrialisation took place between 1564 - 1821. It made difference to all family size, the pre-industrial family was 90% nuclear and the post-industrial family was nuclear. Early theories from functionalists about the family were wrong. Industrialisation began in Britain and North Western Europe and the nuclear family created the conditions for industrialisation. Between 1564 and 1821 only about 10% of all households in Britain contained kin beyond the nuclear family. This percentage is the same for England in 1966. More generally a European family which was also broadly nuclear was found in other countries such as Holland, Belgium and Northern France. While the Southern and Eastern European families were mostly extended. Based on evidence found by British Historian Mark Anderson, the post-industrial extended family began with industrialisation and reached its height during the early 20th century, during the depression. The family was no longer a unit of production as its members were wage earners. The family extended its network under conditions of hard times. The basic ties between a mother and her married daughters became stronger while conjugal ties were weak. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Changes in Family Roles

    I did not get a job until after your granddad passed away, we had n o money and so I had to get a job. While alive, his chores around the house were limited although he did help cook if he had any free time.

  2. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    The proportion of single parent families increased from 8% in 1971 to 17% in 1989. 15% wee lone mothers and 2% lone fathers. The change in the reasons why people marry: * Philippe Aries (1973) "suggests that before the rise of individualism under capitalism, marriage was usually a matter of

  1. “The nuclear family is the cornerstone of society”.Discuss with reference to three sociological perspectives.

    According to functionalists, marriage and the nuclear family provide the best opportunity for the socially controlled expression of the sex drive. According to Robertson the family also acts as a socialisation agent to the stability of the society. The family is regarded is where early socialisation takes place according to the functionalist approach.

  2. Rationale - I have decided to study the gender-oriented issue of conjugal roles in ...

    The representatives of the sample, especially the equal sexes ratio. All diaries were handed out to respondents in their home because of the anonymity of the diaries. The weaknesses of my research were that the respondents might have thought the research was official and feel threatened by it, and so refuse to co-operate with it etc.

  1. Pitted against Patriarchy

    It is this community which on the one hand punishes Judith Hearne for her inability to assimilate into it and on the other refuses to release her and therefore achieve independence. The O'Neill's are the familial representation of this community.

  2. Aesthetic Labour at 'Brewsters' family theme pub.

    identifies: we hold some of the self back in the private realm of our psyche. Sources Bolton, S. (2004). Lecture Notes. Craib, I. (1995). 'Some comments on the sociology of the emotions'. Sociology, 29: 151- 158. Cremin, C. S. (2003).

  1. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    is a better indicator of class than the amount of resources or interests. Thus occupation does not capture all aspects of economic class, but it is probably the best single indicator of it. Similarly, concerning social prestige, occupational position is useful in that many occupational pursuits (notably those involving physical labor)

  2. Gender Socialisation

    One of the main problems with women not being taken before 1914 was that the Liberal government was not willing to give them the vote. The Liberals had won a landslide victory in the General election of 1906 and needed to keep this majority in order to stay in government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work