• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What has been the effect ofindustrialisationon the family?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What has been the effect of industrialisation on the family? Family relationships are always recognized within wider kinship groups. In virtually all societies we can identify what sociologists call the nuclear family, two adults living together in a household with their own or adopted children. In most traditional kinship network of some type. When close relatives other than a married couple and children live either in the same household or in the same close and continuous relationship with one another, we speak of an extended family. An extended family may include grandparents, brothers and their wives, sisters and their husbands, aunts and nephews. Before industrialisation there were a lot more extended families but after industrialisation there were a lot more nuclear families. Industrialisation refers to the emergence of mass production using machinery, based on the use of inanimate power resources (like steam or electricity). The family is viewed from all different angles which are based on the views of functionalists, feminists and Marxists just to name but a few. The American Sociologist Talcott Parsons who is a functionalist believes that the family only has two main functions left which are primary socialisation and personality stabilisation. ...read more.

Middle

During the 1970's and 1980's, feminist perspectives dominated most debates and research on the family. If previously the sociology of the family had focused on family structures, the historical development of the nuclear and extended family and the importance of kinship ties, feminism succeeded in directing attention inside families to examine the experiences of women in the domestic sphere. Feminists writings have emphasized a broad spectrum of topics and one of the central concerns which was explored in great depth was the way in which chores were allocated between members of a household. Among feminists there are differing opinions about the historical emergence of this division. While some feminists see it as an outcome of industrial capitalism, others claim that it is linked to patriarchy, and it predates industrialisation. There is some reason to believe that a domestic division of labour existed prior to industrialisation, but it seems clear that capitalist production brought about a much clearer distinction between the domestic and work realms. This process resulted in crystallisation of 'male spheres' and 'female spheres' and power relationships which are felt to this day. ...read more.

Conclusion

He didn't mean that all inequalities between individuals would disappear but the economic system would come under communal ownership and a more humane society than he knew at that present time would be established. Industrialisation took place between 1564 - 1821. It made difference to all family size, the pre-industrial family was 90% nuclear and the post-industrial family was nuclear. Early theories from functionalists about the family were wrong. Industrialisation began in Britain and North Western Europe and the nuclear family created the conditions for industrialisation. Between 1564 and 1821 only about 10% of all households in Britain contained kin beyond the nuclear family. This percentage is the same for England in 1966. More generally a European family which was also broadly nuclear was found in other countries such as Holland, Belgium and Northern France. While the Southern and Eastern European families were mostly extended. Based on evidence found by British Historian Mark Anderson, the post-industrial extended family began with industrialisation and reached its height during the early 20th century, during the depression. The family was no longer a unit of production as its members were wage earners. The family extended its network under conditions of hard times. The basic ties between a mother and her married daughters became stronger while conjugal ties were weak. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Changes in Family Roles

    Respondent: For that reason exactly, men had to work. Most work was out of town and so they were away for long periods of time which meant it was us who had to take care of the children and just around the house. Also, most work was limited to only men because it involved heavy lifting and men type jobs in general.

  2. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    at least 1 out of 3 marriages involves partner who is remarrying, the reconstituted family is becoming increasingly common" Increase in lesbian and homosexual led families * Mike O' Donnell "The number of lesbian and homosexual couples who bring up children is small but increasing Increase in lone parents * Hillary Land (1995)

  1. “The nuclear family is the cornerstone of society”.Discuss with reference to three sociological perspectives.

    This is a class institution .The men originally acquired power over women because of biological factors. Women assumed the role of house wife and men that of bread winner. This ensures men's domination of the labour market. This inequality with in the nuclear family according to the feminist has brought instability to the society as a whole.

  2. Pitted against Patriarchy

    'Your mother will bear me out, won't you?' Over and over and it's what I always say.25 At the high point of her crisis, when she is testing God and facing up to the terrifying realization of living without "the organizing points of family and religion"26 She turns to the O'Neill family in desperation.

  1. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    It is harnessed to social functions and aimed at satisfying the interests of a group. The interest which individuals and groups invest in classificatory systems encompasses their whole social being and defines ''us'' as opposed to ''them.'' This scheme is the basis of the exclusion and inclusion individuals perform among the characteristics produced by the common classificatory system.

  2. Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of ...

    So Parson was wrong to see the pre-industrial family as extended. However like Parson, Laslett's conclusions have also been questioned. He assumes that each household makes up a separate family. However, its possible those two nuclear family households who live close to each other and whose members are related may

  1. Gender Socialisation

    to vote, the right to own property, the right to education, the right to equal employment opportunities and amongst others, the right to legal status. Women have always wanted to be pleased of their minor position in society and to improve their domestic, economic and political position within it.

  2. Aesthetic Labour at 'Brewsters' family theme pub.

    identifies: we hold some of the self back in the private realm of our psyche. Sources Bolton, S. (2004). Lecture Notes. Craib, I. (1995). 'Some comments on the sociology of the emotions'. Sociology, 29: 151- 158. Cremin, C. S. (2003).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work