• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What has been the effect ofindustrialisationon the family?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What has been the effect of industrialisation on the family? Family relationships are always recognized within wider kinship groups. In virtually all societies we can identify what sociologists call the nuclear family, two adults living together in a household with their own or adopted children. In most traditional kinship network of some type. When close relatives other than a married couple and children live either in the same household or in the same close and continuous relationship with one another, we speak of an extended family. An extended family may include grandparents, brothers and their wives, sisters and their husbands, aunts and nephews. Before industrialisation there were a lot more extended families but after industrialisation there were a lot more nuclear families. Industrialisation refers to the emergence of mass production using machinery, based on the use of inanimate power resources (like steam or electricity). The family is viewed from all different angles which are based on the views of functionalists, feminists and Marxists just to name but a few. The American Sociologist Talcott Parsons who is a functionalist believes that the family only has two main functions left which are primary socialisation and personality stabilisation. ...read more.

Middle

During the 1970's and 1980's, feminist perspectives dominated most debates and research on the family. If previously the sociology of the family had focused on family structures, the historical development of the nuclear and extended family and the importance of kinship ties, feminism succeeded in directing attention inside families to examine the experiences of women in the domestic sphere. Feminists writings have emphasized a broad spectrum of topics and one of the central concerns which was explored in great depth was the way in which chores were allocated between members of a household. Among feminists there are differing opinions about the historical emergence of this division. While some feminists see it as an outcome of industrial capitalism, others claim that it is linked to patriarchy, and it predates industrialisation. There is some reason to believe that a domestic division of labour existed prior to industrialisation, but it seems clear that capitalist production brought about a much clearer distinction between the domestic and work realms. This process resulted in crystallisation of 'male spheres' and 'female spheres' and power relationships which are felt to this day. ...read more.

Conclusion

He didn't mean that all inequalities between individuals would disappear but the economic system would come under communal ownership and a more humane society than he knew at that present time would be established. Industrialisation took place between 1564 - 1821. It made difference to all family size, the pre-industrial family was 90% nuclear and the post-industrial family was nuclear. Early theories from functionalists about the family were wrong. Industrialisation began in Britain and North Western Europe and the nuclear family created the conditions for industrialisation. Between 1564 and 1821 only about 10% of all households in Britain contained kin beyond the nuclear family. This percentage is the same for England in 1966. More generally a European family which was also broadly nuclear was found in other countries such as Holland, Belgium and Northern France. While the Southern and Eastern European families were mostly extended. Based on evidence found by British Historian Mark Anderson, the post-industrial extended family began with industrialisation and reached its height during the early 20th century, during the depression. The family was no longer a unit of production as its members were wage earners. The family extended its network under conditions of hard times. The basic ties between a mother and her married daughters became stronger while conjugal ties were weak. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    * Anthony Giddens (1992) "The male control of females sexuality with the traditional patriarchcal family and the ideology of the compulsory heterosexuality are both being broken down and as a consequence our traditional notions of family life and relationships are changing * Hannah Gavron (1960): (The captitive wife: conflicts of household mothers)

  2. Changes in Family Roles

    Also, because of the people I chose to interview were not all from different cultures, their answers cannot be representative of all the different cultures within society. Despite this, the interviews were a great help when answering my first aim.

  1. Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of ...

    households, so the extended families may have therefore been important while remaining residentially dispersed among several neighbouring households. Young and Willmott (Y&W) believed that there were four stages of the family and from those four, three main stages. They studied family life in London (1950's - 1970's)( using historical research and social surveys.

  2. “The nuclear family is the cornerstone of society”.Discuss with reference to three sociological perspectives.

    According to functionalists, marriage and the nuclear family provide the best opportunity for the socially controlled expression of the sex drive. According to Robertson the family also acts as a socialisation agent to the stability of the society. The family is regarded is where early socialisation takes place according to the functionalist approach.

  1. Rationale - I have decided to study the gender-oriented issue of conjugal roles in ...

    The representatives of the sample, especially the equal sexes ratio. All diaries were handed out to respondents in their home because of the anonymity of the diaries. The weaknesses of my research were that the respondents might have thought the research was official and feel threatened by it, and so refuse to co-operate with it etc.

  2. Pitted against Patriarchy

    Besides which, their husbands often told them interesting stories. But a single girl was in a different position. People simply didn't want to hear how she managed things like accommodation and budgets.23 In attempting to produce a performance of femininity Hearne exposes the performative status of gendered identity as cultural constructs.

  1. Aesthetic Labour at 'Brewsters' family theme pub.

    Sociology, 29: 151- 158. Cremin, C. S. (2003). 'Self-starters, can-doers and mobile Phoneys: Situation vacant columns and the personality culture in employment'. Sociological Review, 51: 109-128. Filby, M. P. (1992). 'The figures, the personality and the bums: Service work and sexuality'. Work, Employment & Society, 6: 23-42. Flam, H.

  2. Organizational Perspectives on Stratification.

    The problem with these theories is that empirical investigation is difficult at best. Weber perhaps made the most headway concerning class structure in his famous distinction between class, status, and political party, for he calls particular attention t the different dimensions of social stratification.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work