• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Is Politics And Why Is Power Difficult To Define?

Extracts from this document...


What Is Politics And Why Is Power Difficult To Define? To understand Politics, we need to understand three other terms, society, government and authority, as all three are what politics revolves around. Politics is society; Society is a community and everything the community involves, culture, religion and things such as social class. Society is organised by politics. Politics in a society deal with disagreements or conflicts. Within a society, there will always be different groups with different opinions, something is needed to make sure these groups, are able to co-exist, this is politics. Politics is needed to decide who in a society should hold authority over the other people in a society, the allocation of authority. Authority itself however is complicated as it has more than one area of meaning. Authority can actually be three different things within society; Max Weber a German sociologist defines these 3 meanings. Weber divided authority into traditional authority, charismatic authority and rational-legal authority. An example of traditional authority would be the English Monarchy. This is self explanatory, as it is traditional that the Monarchy holds some sort of authority. An example of charismatic authority would be a character such as Jesus Christ; he was not given any authority via politics nor was he born with any, such as a monarch. ...read more.


Firstly Weber, he says the power falls into two areas, coercion and authority. This shows us that authority might not actually be power, but at least has something to do with it. Weber apart from dividing authority into three categories, states that authority is accepted because it is legitimate. A good example of this is that in England, parliaments decisions are excepted because they are regarded by society as lawful. His second area of power, coercion, is stated as being "not legitimate by those subject to it". People ruling coercively, may use force to keep themselves in power. A good example of coercive power would be what the black people in South Africa suffered before the time of Nelson Mandella. So do we have power defined, according to one person we do, but not according to other people, who seem to have different ideas and theories on power. One of these people was Karl Marx; Marx was a German economist who lived at the end of the 19th century. Marx believed that the Economic system determined the political system. He thought that the people who control the means of production, distribution and exchange were the people who held the power. ...read more.


In my opinion Marx had the best theory, I do not believe however that it could ever work, but it was a good idea. This is because the person, who "runs" the communist state is always going to have the power, be it coercive or not. Good examples of this are communist Russia ran by Stalin or communist Cuba ran by Fidel Castro. It would be nice to believe that coercive power should never be needed and democracy existed world wide, but its not going to happen. Also is democracy the only answer, as with democracy there is always going to be a "minority" that is overruled, so at any one point, not everyone is going to be happy. To answer my own question I asked earlier "without government, society would be chaos?" yes, I think it would. I don't feel qualified to state what would solve all the worlds' political problems, but I do feel qualified to say that there is always going to be someone who is unhappy, so do we try and make them happy and make someone else unhappy, or do we just go with it and try and make as many people happy as possible and say "tough luck" to the minority? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast Karl Marx's and Michel Foucault's analysis of the concept power.

    Moreover the ways it produces normal, or healthy people, excludes the other which ensures opposition and resistance are built in effects. For instance a person could be classed as a deviant simply because the human sciences produce such a category and its characteristics and consequences.

  2. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    Individuals and bodies outside of the positions listed, yet who wield some influence in the respective fields will also be addressed at the appropriate points in this paper. Studying Elites and Social Structure Historically, class and wealth have been the principal areas of social stratification discussed in relation to elite composition.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    The more imperatives that issued from the ethic of reciprocity among neighbors were raised, the more rational the conception of salvation became, and the more it was sublimated into an ethic of absolute ends. The Economic Sphere The tension between brotherly religion and the world has been most obvious in the economic sphere.

  2. Money and Power still remains with Caucasians

    other ethnicities but I will further expand this in the rest of my report. To operationalise the key term in my hypothesis we must see what it actually means. For the term 'successful' I mean a better quality of life is gained this suggests money, education, position in society and overall happiness.

  1. Homophobia: a Definition

    The real threat behind homophobia is not homosexuality but change in the system of male supremacism vis-a-vis women. Note that challenges to social dominance by minorities can be countered by false assertions (usually sexual)

  2. The Politics of New Social Movements - Why is it difficult to define a ...

    An NSM is not necessarily motivated by achieving a pre-set goal but by the belief itself. This is one reason that can explain why members or 'adherents' of social movements are fully prepared to make self-sacrifices, such as imprisonment, for their cause.

  1. Unit 4 Assessment: Power & Politics

    The Pluralist view has been criticised for ignoring and disregarding the unequal distribution of power in society. Some critical Elitists accept that the state is controlled by a few groups of the Elite and that it mostly serves the interest the Elite ruling class.

  2. Working More Creatively With Groups.

    I am a firm believer in the belief that everything happens for a reason and I think that I was given the passage on potent leadership for a reason. There are eighty-one passages in the Tao of Leadership and I got this one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work