• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Is Politics And Why Is Power Difficult To Define?

Extracts from this document...


What Is Politics And Why Is Power Difficult To Define? To understand Politics, we need to understand three other terms, society, government and authority, as all three are what politics revolves around. Politics is society; Society is a community and everything the community involves, culture, religion and things such as social class. Society is organised by politics. Politics in a society deal with disagreements or conflicts. Within a society, there will always be different groups with different opinions, something is needed to make sure these groups, are able to co-exist, this is politics. Politics is needed to decide who in a society should hold authority over the other people in a society, the allocation of authority. Authority itself however is complicated as it has more than one area of meaning. Authority can actually be three different things within society; Max Weber a German sociologist defines these 3 meanings. Weber divided authority into traditional authority, charismatic authority and rational-legal authority. An example of traditional authority would be the English Monarchy. This is self explanatory, as it is traditional that the Monarchy holds some sort of authority. An example of charismatic authority would be a character such as Jesus Christ; he was not given any authority via politics nor was he born with any, such as a monarch. ...read more.


Firstly Weber, he says the power falls into two areas, coercion and authority. This shows us that authority might not actually be power, but at least has something to do with it. Weber apart from dividing authority into three categories, states that authority is accepted because it is legitimate. A good example of this is that in England, parliaments decisions are excepted because they are regarded by society as lawful. His second area of power, coercion, is stated as being "not legitimate by those subject to it". People ruling coercively, may use force to keep themselves in power. A good example of coercive power would be what the black people in South Africa suffered before the time of Nelson Mandella. So do we have power defined, according to one person we do, but not according to other people, who seem to have different ideas and theories on power. One of these people was Karl Marx; Marx was a German economist who lived at the end of the 19th century. Marx believed that the Economic system determined the political system. He thought that the people who control the means of production, distribution and exchange were the people who held the power. ...read more.


In my opinion Marx had the best theory, I do not believe however that it could ever work, but it was a good idea. This is because the person, who "runs" the communist state is always going to have the power, be it coercive or not. Good examples of this are communist Russia ran by Stalin or communist Cuba ran by Fidel Castro. It would be nice to believe that coercive power should never be needed and democracy existed world wide, but its not going to happen. Also is democracy the only answer, as with democracy there is always going to be a "minority" that is overruled, so at any one point, not everyone is going to be happy. To answer my own question I asked earlier "without government, society would be chaos?" yes, I think it would. I don't feel qualified to state what would solve all the worlds' political problems, but I do feel qualified to say that there is always going to be someone who is unhappy, so do we try and make them happy and make someone else unhappy, or do we just go with it and try and make as many people happy as possible and say "tough luck" to the minority? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    From the standpoint of inner-worldly asceticism, the organic ethic lacks the drive for an ethical and thorough rationalization of individual life. In such matters, it has no premium for the rational and methodical patterning of personal life in the interest of the individual's own salvation.

  2. Determining the Elite within Politics and the Judiciary.

    Individuals and bodies outside of the positions listed, yet who wield some influence in the respective fields will also be addressed at the appropriate points in this paper. Studying Elites and Social Structure Historically, class and wealth have been the principal areas of social stratification discussed in relation to elite composition.

  1. Working More Creatively With Groups.

    The fishbowl experience was very valuable to me. I was able to participate in a group in a way that I had never done before. I was neither very loud nor very quiet; I was just in the middle, which is rare for me.

  2. Unit 4 Assessment: Power & Politics

    The Pluralist view has been criticised for ignoring and disregarding the unequal distribution of power in society. Some critical Elitists accept that the state is controlled by a few groups of the Elite and that it mostly serves the interest the Elite ruling class.

  1. Money and Power still remains with Caucasians

    the formation of the European Union, which has put huge taxes on imported goods made outside of the EU; these taxes are also in place in America. These are hurried attempts by the greedy west to keep other countries from becoming rich.

  2. The Politics of New Social Movements - Why is it difficult to define a ...

    An NSM is not necessarily motivated by achieving a pre-set goal but by the belief itself. This is one reason that can explain why members or 'adherents' of social movements are fully prepared to make self-sacrifices, such as imprisonment, for their cause.

  1. Does Class Alignment Still Exist In British Politics?

    old class patterns become much more complex, with old views of middle and working-class connotations not providing sensitive enough descriptions for social groupings. Heath, Curtice and Jowell re-iterated this point, claiming that, "political scientists have concentrated on minor arrangements of the furniture while failing to notice a major change in the structure of the house...

  2. Caste system in HinduismThe historical background It is difficult to trace out when ...

    This leads us to conclude that the Sudras were either a part of Kshatriyas or had their share among the Brahmins. During those days the intermixing among castes was as liberal as it made the cross-over an easy-go. The caste changes were very easy in the process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work