• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Both Adam Smith and Jean-Jacque Rousseau desire to understand the correlation between human nature, the progress of society, and societys condition in modernity.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Division of Labor: The Progression and Deterioration of Society Both Adam Smith and Jean-Jacque Rousseau desire to understand the correlation between human nature, the progress of society, and society's condition in modernity. They highlight the division of labor as the vehicle of society's evolution and focus on the desire for self-preservation and a capacity for improvement as the two human traits that drive this progressive vehicle. However, Smith and Rousseau form divergent philosophies about the human condition in modernity when assessing the consequences of division of labor on social order and conflict. Though both philosophers believe that the division of labor is a derivative of humankind's ability to improve the powers of labor and forge relationships based on mutual self-interest, Jean-Jacques Rousseau believes that interdependence ultimately leads to the disintegration of empathy while Smith believes that interdependence is an affirmation of humanity at its most basic level. Both Smith and Rousseau believe innate self-interest drives humans to improve the powers of their labor and societal interactions. According to Rousseau in The Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men, Taught by experience that love of well-being is the sole spring of human actions, he was in a position to distinguish...occasions when common ...read more.

Middle

The improved quality of products, rise in the amount of leisure time, and increased productivity are consequences of specialization and "this same trucking disposition which originally gives occasion to the division of labour" (Smith, 16). In other words, increased productivity and specialization create the conditions for society to advance and the quality of life to improve; all of which are a product of the division of labor - the pinnacle invention of humankind's adaptability and regard for self-preservation. Though Smith and Rousseau agree that the division of labor accelerates society's progress into modernity and are due to faculties found in human nature, the philosophers diverge in their viewpoints when assessing the consequences of said societal change on social order and conflict. Rousseau depicts society's progression with cynicism and disdain, Nascent Society gave way to the most horrible state of war: Humankind, debased and devastated, no longer able to turn back or to renounce its wretched acquisitions, and working only to its shame by the abuse of the faculties that do it honor, brought itself to the brink of ruin (Rousseau, 172). To Rousseau, division of labor results in innovation and interdependence, but for the worse. ...read more.

Conclusion

Since the tendency to barter and exchange is a derivative of humankind's propensity for self-preservation and perfectibility, Smith believes that affirming interdependence is the most human thing one can do and only improves the general welfare and quality of life for all of society. Furthermore, Smith disagrees with Rousseau's belief that interdependence creates social inequity, but rather that "the person who either acquires, or succeeds to a great fortune, does not necessarily acquire or succeed to any political power, either civil or military" (Smith, 34). In other words, division of labor and dependence between humans in the marketplace does not generate social disparities or conflict, but rather maximizes utility. To Rousseau and Smith, malleability and perfectibility under the division of labor acquires a different set of consequences for society in modernity. To Rousseau, interdependency warps humankind's primal self-interest from mere survival to economic and political greed; thus rearing a state of malicious rivalry and exploitation on all sides. To Smith, the primal self-interest was and always will be to work less and enjoy more personal and collective rewards. He believes that social harmony is a natural outcome of humankind's propensity to live and work together. Therefore, self-interest drives the economy and accelerates social progress, facilitating mutual benefits and increased universal prosperity for everyone. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Anthropology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Anthropology essays

  1. In his movie Guns, Germs, and Steel, Jared Diamond argues that geography gives certain ...

    Because of their two different geographies, the Amerindians stood no chance against the Spaniards. Another example of how geography decides which civilizations are more advanced and successful than others is the decline of the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was geographically between the East and the West of the world.

  2. Apply Functionalism and Structuralism to the Trobriander Islanders Economy

    Although this is true, people of the highest authority (i.e. the chief) will receive the most yams because he is the only person who can be polygamous and will therefore receive yams from several matrilineages, which means that he is the most respected, influential and richest person in the dala.

  1. While each Greek meal is fresh and inviting, it is also a trip back ...

    There are many ethnicities that make up the culture of Hawai'i. The most predominant ethnicities are Hawaiian, Japanese, Filipino, Korean, Chinese, and Portuguese just to name a few. This is one state where the "minorities" actually make up the "majority".

  2. For my research I interviewed a person from Costa Rica. I found that Costa ...

    People usually don�t wear shorts outside the beach areas and they use leather dress shoes, instead of tennis, unless they are doing sports. When you sit down to ear, it is polite to say Buenos dias , it means good day, good morning, to people you might be sharing a table with.

  1. Investigating food and culture in Costa Rica

    "America culture makes me lazy. I buy more half-prepared product. More bread, French fries instead of rice, more meat instead of balancing meal with more vegetable, more beverage less soup. Back to my country, a KFC or McDonald's meal is more expensive than a regular Chinese meal, I seldom had

  2. My Own Culture - growing up in Malay culture.

    You can pick your friends, goes the saying, but you can't pick your family. This is actually a relief: family members may not choose each other, but they don't (usually) reject each other, either. For example; my family are really united together, when we had to gone through the most painful moment in our life.

  1. Evidence for bipedal locomotion allows archaeologists and paleontologists to trace the evolution of the ...

    Moreover, in order to acquire a profound understanding of these evolutionary changes, with the help of material culture, we must compare the early hominids' anatomy to ours. The discovery of Lucy in 1974 proved to be a benchmark in archaeology.

  2. Presentation on Leslie White. In his new quest to understand why peoples behave ...

    sun --> plants --> animals * The life process, in its maintenance of in the individual organism is not merely a matter of capturing quantities of energy and of incorporating them within living systems to take the place of like quantities that have been expended during the process of living.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work