• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38

Ford Company Analysis - corporate structure and financial analysis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐FORD MOTOR ? company analysis ?PROFITABLE GROWTH FOR ALL? Helena Kiviniitty Jakob Caculovic Milos Grubic December, 2012 Contents Introduction 1. Analysis of corporate governance 1.2 Charter of the Audit Committee 1.3 Charter of the Compensation Committee 1.4 Charter of the Finance Committee 1.5 Charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee 1.6 Charter of the Sustainability Committee 1.7 Corporate Governance Principles 1.7.1 Main idea 1.8 Board of Directors Structure and Operations/Board Compensation 1.8.1 The process of selection and the size of the board 1.8.2 Qualifications 1.8.3 Independence of Directors 1.8.4 Board Committees 1.8.5 Compensation of Board 1.8.6 Director Orientation and Continuing Education 1.8.7 Meetings 1.8.8 Responsibilities and Duties 1.8.9 Conflicts of Interest and Concern Reporting 1.9 Annual Performance Evaluation 1.9.1 CEO Alan Roger Mulally 2.Financial statement and ratio analysis 3.Estimation of the cost of equity, debt and the cost of total capital 4.Evaluating the firm?s current investments 5.Where and how firm get its current financing? 6. Estimation of the optimal financing mix with an indication of whether and how the company should move to the optimal capital structure 7. Evaluation of Cash Redistributions to Shareholders 6.1 Main Competition Analysis References Introduction Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn (suburb of Detroit), Michigan, manufactures or distributes automobiles across six continents. With about 168,000 employees and about 65 plants worldwide, the company?s automotive brands include Ford and Lincoln. The company provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company. In the past it has also produced heavy trucks, tractors and automotive components. Ford owns small stakes in Mazda of Japan and Aston Martin of the United Kingdom. 1. Analysis of corporate governance The Board of Directors of Ford Motor Company has adopted corporate governance practices to promote the effective functioning of the Board, its committees, and the Company: 1. Charter of the Audit Committee 2. Charter of the Compensation Committee 3. Charter of the Finance Committee 4. ...read more.

Middle

Shanks 19 Relationships Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Chairman of Global Risk Management Committee 59 Mark Fields No Relationships Chief Operating Officer 51 Michael E. Bannister 47 Relationships Executive Vice President, Executive Chairman of Ford Motor Credit Co and Chief Executive Officer of Ford Motor Credit Co 62 Insiders At Ford Motor Co (F) Name (Connections) Board Relationships Title Age William Ford Jr. 206 Relationships Executive Chairman, Chairman of Finance Committee and Member of Sustainability Committee 54 Alan Mulally 25 Relationships Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Director and Member of Finance Committee 66 Michael Bannister 47 Relationships Executive Vice President, Executive Chairman of Ford Motor Credit Co and Chief Executive Officer of Ford Motor Credit Co 62 John Lawler 28 Relationships Vice President, Chairman of Ford Motor China and Chief Executive Officer of Ford Motor China 46 Edsel Ford II 98 Relationships Consultant, Director, Member of Finance Committee and Member of Sustainability Committee 63 Other Board Members On Board Name (Connections) Board Relationships Primary Company Age Homer Neal 40 Relationships Ford Motor Co. 66 Ellen Marram 239 Relationships KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp III. 63 Richard Manoogian 138 Relationships Richard & Jane Manoogian Foundation 75 Stephen Butler 36 Relationships Cooper Industries plc 64 Irvine Hockaday Jr. 73 Relationships The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. 75 John Thornton 371 Relationships Laura Ashley Holdings plc 58 Kimberly Casiano 28 Relationships Mead Johnson Nutrition Company 54 Gerald Shaheen 131 Relationships U.S. Chamber of Commerce 65 Richard Gephardt J.D. 144 Relationships The Boeing Company 71 Anthony Earley Jr. 256 Relationships PG&E Corp. 63 James Hance Jr. 98 Relationships Family Dollar Stores Inc. 67 William Helman IV 135 Relationships Greylock Partners 54 Jon Huntsman Jr. 47 Relationships Huntsman Corporation 51 William Ford Sr. 21 Relationships Ford Motor Company Of New Zealand Limited 1.9.1 CEO Alan Roger Mulally Allan Roger Mulally is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford Motor Company. ...read more.

Conclusion

Date 3. Avg. # of stocks 4. Amount $ (1x3) 0,05 Jan 27 48 Mil. 2,4 Mil. 0,05 Apr 30 48 Mil. 2,4 Mil. 0,05 Aug 1 30 Mil. 1,5 Mil. 0,05 Oct 31 44 Mil. 2,2 Mil. This dividend policy showed to be good, especially because (on purpose or not) it lowered the effect of the economic depression in 2008 and the following years. As we can examine the dividend payout rate, at least we can analyze FCFE- free cash flow for equity. 2008 2009 2010 2011 Net Income -14.571 2.699 6.561 20.319 Depreciation 12.421 6.931 5.584 4.256 Capital Expenditures -783 -4.179 -3.230 -4.029 Change in Debt -14.334 -21.755 -28.453 -4.500 Change in WC -3.521 5.631 -16.369 -1.624 FCFE -13.746 -21.935 -3.169 17.670 From table we have constructed and calculated FCFE we can conclude that Ford reasonably haven?t paid out dividends in previous years, and also we find very positive signal for investors that after marking positive FCFE in 2011 they have declared and paid dividends in 2012. 6.1 Main Competition Analysis The Ford?s biggest competitors are General Motors and Toyota Motors. General Motors (000 $) 2011 2010 2009 1. FCFE 9.190.000 6.172.000 (4.297.000) 2. Dividends paid 916.000 1.572.000 97.000 3. Buybacks 0 1.462.000 0 4. Payout ratio (2+3/1) 9,96% 49.15% -2.25% Toyota Motors (000 $) 2011 2010 2009 1. FCFE 3.446.000 4.925.000 2.242.000 2. Dividends paid 1.905.000 1.700.000 1.846.000 3. Buybacks 455.000 345.000 110.000 4. Payout ratio (2+3/1) 68,48% 41.52 % 87.24% As it can be seen from the tables GM and Toyota have paid their dividends regularly and didn?t change their policies. Nevertheless they did so from different reasons. Toyota from success in US market in years prior and during the crisis. Toyota has with years become world?s largest car manufacturer, so it has been reasonable for them to maintain their dividend policy. GM on the other hand went thru the hardest part of their history. Besides government back-ups they had to sell their brands Saab and Hummer and go through a restructuring period. Selling the assets made it mandatory for them to return some investments to the investors. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Business Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Business Studies essays

  1. Project Management - planning an all inclusive carnival concert in the North Western end ...

    and (RAM Appendix). The team members responsible for decoration, caterers, bar and toilets, venue and advertising, security and parking, live performers, entertainment and music set up must report directly to me, the project manager on their progress. This is necessary to keep the project on track, by using these reports

  2. HMV Group plcs environmental and strategic position

    Negotiate prices of digital books. Research market for digital book readers. Decide which digital book readers to stock. Contact suppliers/manufactures of digital book readers and negotiate possible prices. 1 - 4 1 - 4 8 - 10 1 - 4 4 - 8 8 - 10 Customer Purchase System Create shelf space for books and readers.

  1. Starbucks expansion into China

    Since the latter period of the 1990s, the increasing speed though to certain extent dropped, still reached 7-8%, which was really commendable under the circumstance that the global economy increase slowed down. The Gross Domestic Product in, RMB 8.940.4 billion Yuan 2000, RMB 9,593.3 billion Yuan in 2001 and RMB

  2. The Main advantages and disadvantages of mixed economy system

    it on figure 3.12, for the last 5 years unemployment rate in China was decreasing, having a fall by 4.8% in 2007. It continued to fall even in 2008 despite World Economic Crisis. However, estimates for 2009 are already showing that this indicator is more likely to rise due to recession in production by foreign companies.

  1. Leadership styles and analysis of my leadership skills.

    The sixth assessment is "How Good Am I at Building and Leading a Team", I scored 104 and the scores ranges from 18 and 108. This result indicated that I am in the top quartile (95 and above) while below 60 is bottom quartile.

  2. Business plan for Laundry Toaster laundry dryer.

    Creative Thinking. The process of generating ideas, which frequently emphasizes: 1. making and expressing meaningful new connections, 2. thinking of many new and unusual possibilities, and 3. extending and elaborating on alternatives. 1. Design for Reliability. Designing the product so it works the first time, every time for the life of the product (decreasing cycle failure).

  1. Dividend policy at Linear Technology

    This would be substantiated by the 3 to 7% growth in FY2003 3Q which met expectations, as well as the lack of opportunities for investment of cash on hand, higher than the current return of 3%. The financial effects of this dividend would also not be significant on the expected

  2. SWOT Analysis of Apollo Language School, Vietnam.

    generation, so there will be no need to forcing them to study ? Experience in organizing the years of Apollo and partners => Flawless structure due to years of experience ? Head of the delegation traveling with experienced and dynamic ? Regularly updated information / pictures of the Group for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work