• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World Trade Organization

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The official World Trade Organisation web site, defines the WTO as "the only global international organisation dealing with the rules of trade between nations . . . [through] helping producers of goods and services, exporters, and importers (to) conduct their business"1. It was formed in 1995 after growing out of and extending the institution of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. As of the thirtieth of November 2000, the WTO has 140 member-countries, over three-quarters of which are developing or least-developed countries. As the WTO implies, its current role is to serve as the lubrication for the joints in the engine of globalisation; although just how effective and fair this lubrication may be, is still a point of great contention. The WTO preaches that its purpose and effect are to "improve the welfare of the people of the member countries"2, and it claims that this is achieved by administering trade agreements, and monitoring and handling trade disputes. This essay will test the truth in this statement, of whether or not the actions taken by the WTO have failed to further enhance the welfare of the people of its member countries, and if so, whether the WTO therefore needs to be either reformed or even abolished. The criteria by which I will assess this truth, takes into account the three major arguments that are held against the WTO, with regard to its affect on the welfare of the people of its member countries. ...read more.

Middle

1999). It forgets that these economies lack the infrastructure to capitalise on their own potentially competitive industries, and therefore must succumb to the will of self-focussed multinationals in order to preserve a tortured survival (Sirico 2000). It makes no sense that the WTO wishes countries to focus on those industries in which they are globally competitive, and yet allows dominating multinationals to 'milk' their local industries of their rightful funds. Wills proffers the example of Uganda and Nestle. Coffee being Uganda's main export good, and Nestle being the multinational corporation which 'exports jobs' from its home economy, in order to rob Uganda's workers of their equivalent wage and work conditions. The entire production process of the coffee is completed in Nestle's factories located in Uganda, before being shipped over and sold to retailers in Nestle's home economies. The only profit the Ugandan's truly receive, is the paltry price for which they sold the unprocessed coffee. It is very easy to rationalise this unfair exploitation with economic rules and models which follow logical principles, a task the WTO is trying to achieve using the support of its four major member-country economies; the US, Canada, the European Union, and Japan. Unfortunately, on the other side of this free-trade coin, there is a country whose majority of members suffer from exploitative work practices and sub-standard work conditions. That the WTO serves as a forum for countries to "thrash out their difficulties"3 regarding their trade practices, is of no consequence when the foundations upon which the WTO's rules and agreements stand is considered. ...read more.

Conclusion

At present, this includes Australasia and "the economic backwaters of the world"6, Africa and the Indian sub-continent. Within such a future, those countries not in supranational trading blocs, are denied access to "half of all global imports" 6. To this degree, it doesn't seem as if the WTO wants to unite the world's trading arrangements. In fact, its motives would appear simply to capitalise on those trade arrangements occurring between the three proposed regional trading blocs; a move which would almost certainly cleave a planet's trading arrangements in two, with one side geographically and economically disadvantaged. For all of these reasons, I have decided that the WTO should be abolished. Inefficiency is nothing compared to poverty and greed. Why is it that we must always compete so viciously that someone must get hurt? Where does growth really lead, but to one's overindulgence and another's lack thereof? More humanitarian ideals are necessary, if we as a global entity are to truly unite. No organisation which fosters monetary gain over sub-standard living, should ever be backed so powerfully by such greedy nations. By simply existing, the WTO serves as figurehead of what is wrong with the world; and what we need to do to fix it. Bibliography FOOTNOTES: 1: WTO - Website (http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/whatis_e.htm) 2: WTO - Website (http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/inbrief_e/inbr00_e.htm) 3: WTO - Website (http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/10ben_e/10b00_e.htm) 4: Callaghan, D., Class Notes : 2001 5: WTO - Website (http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/inbrief_e/inbr00_e.htm) 6: Chong, F., February 1 The Australian p.28. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Business Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Business Studies essays

  1. Analysing Job sectors in Canada. Identify trends in employment and occupational demand patterns for ...

    gains in productivity and employment, generally improves the "skills base" of the labour force in both manufacturing and services. And it is largely because of technology that employers now pay more for knowledge than for manual work. Manufacturing and Knowledge-Based Industries are drivers of Economic Growth and are a new path to prosperity.

  2. What impact has NAFTA had on trade among the three member countries?

    In the same manner Mexico has seen a steep rise in their agricultural exports to its NAFTA partners. Canada, from 1994 to 2001 has seen a rise of 95% of its agricultural exports to its partners. Canada on another perspective has seen the most advantage on this area.

  1. People in organisations - analysing my suitability for 3 different jobs.

    for help and guidance Self-motivated and able to use own initiative and can work independently Takes responsibility for own work Proficient use of all Microsoft programmes Good organisational skills Records information accurately Pays attention to detail Efficient and well organised Understands and implements processes Builds appropriate professional, friendly and accessible

  2. Questions on Globalisation and International Trade

    That has changed. Today, U.S. and British manufacturers must compete with competitors from across the world to win orders. The changing demographics of the world economy favor a city like Hong Kong. Hong Kong (which is now under Chinese rule)

  1. To compare the operations between the manufacturing organization and service organization, I have taken ...

    So, with these inputs from the customer the bank process the application form creates an account in the name of customer for which he was initially provided with a passbook and ATM card. Further with the choice of customer the bank provides an internet banking account, mobile banking and other services.

  2. The purpose of this report is to outline the opportunities and threats for Australian ...

    Government, which is the central government of the People's Republic of China in Beijing; it is really synonymous with the State Council and their local administrations. (Political Overview of China, 2010) The Chinese government is known to be always antagonism between liberal democracies and communist democracies.

  1. Case Study of IKEA with Indian Rugs and Child Labour

    The fact that IKEA does not have its own manufacturing facilities; instead it uses subcontracted manufacturers all over the world for supplies makes it more complex and difficult to keep track of the company?s suppliers and subsuppliers. It is even more difficult to keep track of children working in homes where whole families worked on looms from the subsuppliers? level.

  2. Globalisation needs to be controlled.Analyse this statement in the light of recent events (such ...

    But unemployment is more likely to be high in industrialised countries as many companies search for cheaper alternatives for manufacturing. 3. Competition ? becomes stronger with intervention of globalisation, on one hand leading for better products and services. On the other hand, it may lead to monopoly of international company in the country, therefore killing domestic businesses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work