• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Acid rain lab report

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Chemistry Lab Report: The effect of acid rain on different metals: * Research question: From all of the metals Iron, Copper, Tin, Aluminium, Lead, Nickel, used in the architecture of a building, which of these metals will corrode the least when acid rain reacts with these metals? * Background Information :Acid rain is caused by air pollution when fossil fuels such as coal, oil or natural gas is burnt and when smoke is emitted from industries into the air. Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides which is present in the smoke, reacts with the water and the other chemicals in the air to form nitric acid(HNO3) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) which falls down to the earth's surface as acid rain and since it is corrosive, it causes damage to buildings, sculptures and to other forms of infrastructure. * Theory: Metals such as, Copper, Tin, Aluminum, Lead, Nickel, will corrode or dissolve in the acid when it reacts with acid rain causing the mass of the metal to decrease. ...read more.

Middle

This is the only factor which will be kept changed for all the experiments. Each metal will be measured by weighing 10 g by using the pan balance for each trial. * Dependent variable: The dependent variable is the loss in mass over the time given for the metal to dissolve in the acid rain. As this will depend on the metal used. As the metal which has the greatest weight loss, that metal would be the one which should not be used for a metal in building. The metal with the least loss should be used. The loss in mass of the metal will be measured in grams by weighing all the beakers with a pan balance with acid rain in it and adding the metal to the acid rain forming a solution and weighing it. After the fixed amount of time kept, weigh the final amount of the beaker. The difference between the initial and the final mass of the beaker with the contents will be the loss which is the dependent variable. ...read more.

Conclusion

5. Start the time and keep the time as 30 minutes for the experiment. 6. Repeat steps 1 to 5 for Copper, Tin, Aluminium, Nickel, and Lead. 7. After 30 minutes, weigh the mass of the beaker with its contents. 8. Record the change in mass. 9. Repeat steps 7 to 9 for Aluminum, Copper, Tin, Lead and Nickel. 10. Measure out 100 ml of acid rain with the measuring cylinder and pour it into the beaker. 11. Weigh the mass of the beaker with the acid rain in it with a pan balance. 12. Take Iron chips and weigh 10 g of it with a pan balance and place it in the beaker. 13. Weigh the beaker with these contents as the initial weight and cover it with a lid. 14. Start the time and keep the time as 30 minutes for the experiment. 15. Repeat steps 10 to 14 for Copper, Tin, Aluminium, Nickel, and Lead. 16. After 30 minutes, weigh the mass of the beaker with its contents. 17. Record the change in mass. 18. Repeat steps 7 to 9 for Aluminum, Copper, Tin, Lead and Nickel. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Acids/Bases Design Lab. How does a change in the pH value of a solution ...

    (Recall, do as you otter, add acid to water!) 4. A clean, dry, 50.0cm3 graduated cylinder was filled with approximately 10.0cm3 of distilled water. The 4.5cm3 of hydrochloric acid solution in the 10.0cm3 graduated cylinder, was then added to the 50.0cm3 graduated cylinder containing approximately 10.0cm3 of distilled water. 5.

  2. Reactivity series for common metals experiment.

    � Lead: No texture/surface/color change (No Reaction) I. Iron Chloride(Fe Cl) with: � Copper: No texture/surface/color change (No Reaction) � Iron: No texture/surface/color change (No Reaction) � Magnesium:Its surface turns black (Reaction � Zinc:Turns black on its surface (Reaction) � Lead: No texture/surface/color change (No Reaction) I. Magnesium Sulphate(MgSO4)with: � Copper: No texture/surface/color change (No Reaction)

  1. Change of Potential Difference in Voltaic Cells Lab Report

    of 1.0 M solution using a 50mL volumetric flask. The molar mass of copper sulfate pentahydrate is 249.71g/mol. 2. From the molar mass of copper sulfate pentahydrate, CuSO4.5H2O and the number of moles from Step 1, find the mass in grams of solute needed.

  2. titration experiment report

    With around or slightly over 30?, the color of NaOH turned to be very likely to transparent. We found out that a drop would change the color of the solution. The average concentration of the NaOH solution is 0.0987 �1.36% M *note: for the experiment part 1, we used metallic

  1. Aspirin Lab Report

    Volume of NaOH: VI=27.51 mL Vf=44.71 mL Difference: 17.2 mL Titration Equation 0.0172L x 0.100M = 0.00172 moles of NaOH Molar mass C9=108.9 g H9=9.09 g O4=63.96 g 108.9 g + 9.09 g + 63.96 g = 181.96 181.96x Uncertainties Mass of aspirin: 0.868 g Uncertainty of aspirin: � 0.001

  2. Chemistry Titration Acid Base Lab

    the concentration of the sodium hydroxide solution that was subsequently poured in this material and lowered the pH level of the sodium hydroxide solution as water is neutral (pH of 7.0). With a lower concentration of sodium hydroxide in the base, the pH would have decreased therefore allowing more of

  1. Reactivity of Metals with Water and Acid

    All results were recorded. The test tube was extracted from the beaker and without flipping it, was placed mouth down in the test tube rack. Using a spark lighter, the Bunsen burner was lit and a wooden splint was lit from the flame.

  2. The chemistry of atmospheric and water pollution.

    In 1974, scientists Mario Molina, Sherwood Rowland and Paul Crutzen (noble prize winners), demonstrated that CFCs were responsible for ozone depletion. Here is the process: In the stratosphere, the CFC (e.g. CClF3) photo dissociates in UV radiation from the sun to produce a chlorine free radical: CClF3 (g)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work