• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chemistry lab reort-molar volume of hydrogen

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐IB Chemistry DCP and CE Hao Sun Molar Volume of Hydrogen Gas Youhyun Lee 11(1) Trial 1 Raw Data Table Mass of magnesium () 0.045 Temperature of water () 25.0 Temperature of air () 20.0 Initial volume of HCl () 47.40 Final volume of HCl () 3.50 Height of HCl column () 6.5 Reference Data Table Atmospheric pressure () 102.44 Vapor pressure of water (kPa) 3.17 at 25.0 * The reference data was provided by the supervisor. Observation Tiny little bubbles were squirting up from the bottom when the magnesium ribbon was inserted into the burette. The magnesium reacted with hydrochloric acid to produce hydrogen gas. However, less bubbles of hydrogen gas were produced and the reaction was relatively slower than in other groups. As time elapsed, bubble rising velocity and the amount of bubbles were reduced. Big bubbles were intermittently produced by the magnesium and the time interval between successive bubbles became longer as the reaction went to completion. During this time, many tiny bubbles were trapped in the plastic gauze and failed to move up to the surface of the solution. At the beginning of the reaction, a continuous small stream of solution flows from the burette in the water. As time elapsed, the stream has diminished. ...read more.


It is because of the small measurement value of magnesium, which is about 0.040g. Thus, the mole of magnesium has percentage error of 2% and 3% respectively in two trials. Percentage errors of other values, like temperature and volume of hydrogen gas, are all below 0.3%. They are so small that have no effect on the final percentage error when added up with percentage error of mole. As a result, the percentage errors of moles of hydrogen gas are exactly the same as the final percentage errors. Two calculated values of molar volume are and . They are both smaller than the acceptable value and have a percentage error of 4.02% and 1.34% respectively. At the beginning, I suppose these systematic errors are due to the dilation of hydrochloric acid. There was a tiny flow of liquid out of the burette and the sunken magnesium fragment produced bubbles. Both are evidences that hydrochloric acid solution in the burette mixed with water in the beaker and the concentration of solution in the burette fell. However, I denied the idea soon because no lump remained in the gauze after the reaction went to the completion. So I suppose the source of systematic errors is the measurement of hydrogen gas produced. In the first trial, I observed many tiny bubbles attached to the gauze during the reaction. ...read more.


These relatively high percentage uncertainties account to the small mass of magnesium. Although the mass is measured by the electronic scale and has a quite small uncertainty of only, the measured value of mass is also quite small, about 0.040g. It makes the percentage uncertainty relatively large. So the slight difference in the mass of magnesium causes the percentage uncertainties to be relatively large. Evaluation To reduce the systematic error to the least extent, the experiment should be improved in several aspects. The magnesium ribbon should not be torn into several small pieces to prevent the falling of magnesium fragment. It would make the calculated result more accurate. To reduce the amount of hydrogen gas dissolved in the solution, I would increase the rate of reaction by using HCl solution of a slightly higher concentration. Then, the time needed to complete the reaction would decrease a lot and the accuracy of the result would be higher as well. Also using the purer and untarnished magnesium ribbon would increase the accuracy. To reduce the random error, the random error of the mole of hydrogen should be reduced mainly. The mole of hydrogen gas produce equals the mole of magnesium in the reaction. The percentage uncertainty of magnesium mass can be reduced by a larger mass of magnesium consumed. Thus, increasing both the mass of magnesium and concentration of hydrochloric acid would increase the precision of the result value. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Investigate the rate of reaction of luminol in various factors. The objective was to ...

    The modified graph would be: This graph gives a curve, but it does not have a constant half-life, which means the reaction is second order with respect to H2O2. Rate ? [H2O2]2 Rate = k [H2O2]2 To verify my result, I will perform another method that uses rate-concentration graph.


    Evaluation: Despite nearly getting the results that I hypothesized, the experiment that I conducted is filled with flaws and errors. Being far from ideal, there could be many ways in which to improve my experiment in order to assure more accurate and reliable results.

  1. Rates of Reaction Lab

    Clearly, the use of the gas syringe was not the best possible way to measure the amount of gas collected. An easier way to investigate the effect of concentration on reaction rates would be by weighing the conical flask whilst the reaction was progress, in order to determine the decrease in mass.

  2. IB chemistry revision notes

    o This is due to the fact that the nuclear charge increases and the atomic radius decreases slightly. * Down a Group o Electronegativity decreases because although Z increases, the effect is more than compensated by the increase in screening electrons and the diluting effect of atomic radii getting larger.

  1. hess's law

    Conclusion: After conducting the above mentioned experiment, observing the reactions and after carrying out all the appropriate and necessary calculations outlined in the previous pages, I hereby conclude that the molar enthalpy change for the chemical reaction between anhydrous copper (II)

  2. Butane Molar Mass Lab

    Then determine the pressure of butane, volume of displaced water, and temperature of the water/butane gas. Once pressure, moles, volume, and temperature have been determined, plug the values into the ideal gas law equation, PV=nrT, to determine moles. Molar mass is grams / moles, so take the mass / moles.

  1. Change of Potential Difference in Voltaic Cells Lab Report

    Volumetric flask uncertainty 2. The total uncertainty for the volumetric flask is. This is because, throughout the experiment, a 250 ml volumetric flask was used for zinc sulfate solution, a 250 ml flask was used for potassium chloride and a 50 ml, and 100 ml volumetric flasks were used for copper sulfate solution.

  2. To determine the standard enthalpy of formation of Magnesium Oxide using Hess Law.

    However, under the material and time limitations, this was the best type of calorimeter that could be devised. An example of a more sophisticated calorimeter that could be used is a simple thermos flask which to a large extent minimizes heat loss due to conduction, convection and radiation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work