• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chemistry lab reort-molar volume of hydrogen

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐IB Chemistry DCP and CE Hao Sun Molar Volume of Hydrogen Gas Youhyun Lee 11(1) Trial 1 Raw Data Table Mass of magnesium () 0.045 Temperature of water () 25.0 Temperature of air () 20.0 Initial volume of HCl () 47.40 Final volume of HCl () 3.50 Height of HCl column () 6.5 Reference Data Table Atmospheric pressure () 102.44 Vapor pressure of water (kPa) 3.17 at 25.0 * The reference data was provided by the supervisor. Observation Tiny little bubbles were squirting up from the bottom when the magnesium ribbon was inserted into the burette. The magnesium reacted with hydrochloric acid to produce hydrogen gas. However, less bubbles of hydrogen gas were produced and the reaction was relatively slower than in other groups. As time elapsed, bubble rising velocity and the amount of bubbles were reduced. Big bubbles were intermittently produced by the magnesium and the time interval between successive bubbles became longer as the reaction went to completion. During this time, many tiny bubbles were trapped in the plastic gauze and failed to move up to the surface of the solution. At the beginning of the reaction, a continuous small stream of solution flows from the burette in the water. As time elapsed, the stream has diminished. ...read more.


It is because of the small measurement value of magnesium, which is about 0.040g. Thus, the mole of magnesium has percentage error of 2% and 3% respectively in two trials. Percentage errors of other values, like temperature and volume of hydrogen gas, are all below 0.3%. They are so small that have no effect on the final percentage error when added up with percentage error of mole. As a result, the percentage errors of moles of hydrogen gas are exactly the same as the final percentage errors. Two calculated values of molar volume are and . They are both smaller than the acceptable value and have a percentage error of 4.02% and 1.34% respectively. At the beginning, I suppose these systematic errors are due to the dilation of hydrochloric acid. There was a tiny flow of liquid out of the burette and the sunken magnesium fragment produced bubbles. Both are evidences that hydrochloric acid solution in the burette mixed with water in the beaker and the concentration of solution in the burette fell. However, I denied the idea soon because no lump remained in the gauze after the reaction went to the completion. So I suppose the source of systematic errors is the measurement of hydrogen gas produced. In the first trial, I observed many tiny bubbles attached to the gauze during the reaction. ...read more.


These relatively high percentage uncertainties account to the small mass of magnesium. Although the mass is measured by the electronic scale and has a quite small uncertainty of only, the measured value of mass is also quite small, about 0.040g. It makes the percentage uncertainty relatively large. So the slight difference in the mass of magnesium causes the percentage uncertainties to be relatively large. Evaluation To reduce the systematic error to the least extent, the experiment should be improved in several aspects. The magnesium ribbon should not be torn into several small pieces to prevent the falling of magnesium fragment. It would make the calculated result more accurate. To reduce the amount of hydrogen gas dissolved in the solution, I would increase the rate of reaction by using HCl solution of a slightly higher concentration. Then, the time needed to complete the reaction would decrease a lot and the accuracy of the result would be higher as well. Also using the purer and untarnished magnesium ribbon would increase the accuracy. To reduce the random error, the random error of the mole of hydrogen should be reduced mainly. The mole of hydrogen gas produce equals the mole of magnesium in the reaction. The percentage uncertainty of magnesium mass can be reduced by a larger mass of magnesium consumed. Thus, increasing both the mass of magnesium and concentration of hydrochloric acid would increase the precision of the result value. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays


    Evaluation: Despite nearly getting the results that I hypothesized, the experiment that I conducted is filled with flaws and errors. Being far from ideal, there could be many ways in which to improve my experiment in order to assure more accurate and reliable results.

  2. Investigate the rate of reaction of luminol in various factors. The objective was to ...

    The modified graph would be: This graph gives a curve, but it does not have a constant half-life, which means the reaction is second order with respect to H2O2. Rate ? [H2O2]2 Rate = k [H2O2]2 To verify my result, I will perform another method that uses rate-concentration graph.

  1. Butane Molar Mass Lab

    The accepted value of molar mass of butane is 58.124 g/mol, and our average calculated value of the mass of butane is 56.57g/mol. EVALUATING THE PROCESURE(S) - A random error is caused by variability in samples. It can vary between trials of an experiment, and it commonly defined as the deviation from the true accepted value.

  2. Rates of Reaction Lab

    our raw data involved high percentages uncertainties, in turns making the results of this experiment quite unreliable. The apparatus used may not have been of such accuracy as to which it would provide us with exact and precise values. One main problem encountered in the experiment turned out to be the use of the gas syringe.

  1. Hesss Law Lab, use Hesss law to find the enthalpy change of combustion of ...

    And I can therefore conclude that the purpose has been achieved with a satisfactory accuracy and precision indicating that some decisive errors have not been encountered. Having said that there were reasons for some differences in precision and accuracy which can be avoided to improve the results.

  2. Molar Heat combustion chemistry - investigate the effect of molar mass on the molar ...

    Processed Data Table Alcohol Average Molar Heat of Combustion (kJ mol-1) Uncertainty of Average Molar Heat of Combustion (kJ mol-1) Molar Mass (g mol-1) Methanol 312.92 110 32.05 Ethanol 466.46 150 46.08 1-Propanol 1037.45 410 60.11 1-Butanol 1194.44 460 74.14 1-Pentanol 1127.08 380 88.17 Graph: Graph 1. Molar mass vs.

  1. DCP+CE Analysis of a Hydrogen Peroxide Solution

    hydrogen peroxide may be able to become 0% by factors such as; repeating more trials of both titrations to reduce uncertainties and reduce uncertainties in the process of the experiment in reading and blocking out the heat and making the solution in constant temperature in the 1st titration.

  2. IB Chemistry Lab Design - compare the effect of temperature on the concentrations of ...

    Potassium Iodate ? 0.536 g to make 1 dm3 iodine solution 1. Starch (soluble) ? 0.25 g to make 50 ml of 0.5% starch solution 1. 3.00 M Sulphuric Acid ? 60 ml to add to iodine solution 1. Distilled Water ? To make all the solutions and washing Other Materials 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work