• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chemistry thermo lab, Hess's Law.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ï»¿________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ Hess’s Law Lab ________________ Qusai Al Omari ________________ Introduction: In this lab, we will be determining the change in enthalpy for the combustion reaction of magnesium (Mg) using Hess’s law. Procedure: 1. React about 100 mL of 1.00 M hydrochloric acid with 0.80 g of MgO. Note the change in temperature and any qualitative data. 2. React about 100 mL of 1.00 M hydrochloric acid with 0.50 g of Mg. Note the change in temperature and any qualitative data. Raw Data: Quantitative: Reaction, trial Mass (± 0.01 g) Initial temperature (± 0.1â° C) Final temperature (± 0.1â° C) Volume of HCl (± 0.05 mL) Reaction 1, Trial 1 0.80 22.0 26.9 100.00 Reaction 1, Trial 2 0.80 22.2 26.9 100.00 Reaction 2, Trial 1 0.50 21.6 44.4 100.00 Reaction 2, Trial 2 0.50 21.8 43.8 100.00 Qualitative: 1. Hydrochloric acid is colorless and odorless 2. Magnesium tape is shiny after cleaning it from oxidants, increasing its purity. 3. In both reactions, the solution became bubbly. 4. There was a strong odor from the reaction. Data Processing: Trial 1: Reaction 1: First, we have to calculate the ΔT by subtracting the final temperature by initial temperature: 1. 2. 3. Now we calculate the mass of the solution, assuming it has the density as water: 1. 2. 3. 4. Now, we can use q=mc ΔT to calculate the energy gained by the solution: 1. 2. 3. ...read more.

Middle

1. 2. Our final result is: 1. Mg (s) + 0.5 O2(g) MgO(s) Random error and percent error: We can calculate the random error by just adding the random errors of the component reactions: 1. 2. 3. As for the percent error: 1. 2. 3. Trial 2: Reaction 1: First, we have to calculate the ?T by subtracting the final temperature by initial temperature: 1. 2. Now we calculate the mass of the solution, assuming it has the density as water: 1. 2. 3. Now, we can use q=mc ?T to calculate the energy gained by the solution: 1. 2. 3. Therefore: 1. Now, we have to calculate the number of moles for MgO: 1. 2. 3. We can now calculate the change in enthalpy by dividing the q of the reaction by the moles of the limiting reagent: 1. Now, we do reaction 2, trial 1 so we can use Hess?s law to calculate the change in enthalpy of formation, but first we are going to calculate the uncertainty in this expression: First, we calculate the uncertainty for the: 1. 2. 3. Now for mass: 1. 2. As for the energy gained: 1. 2. Now for the energy of the reaction: 1. It is multiplied by an integer (-1) so it is the same unc. As for the moles: 1. ...read more.

Conclusion

for trial 2. For trial 1, my value got a percent error of 7.14%, which is not that bad considering the weaknesses this lab had that will be discussed in the evaluation. However, in trial 2, I got a better percent error, which is 5.15%, we got a better value because we had a bigger ?H values thus when adding them (since one of them is positive and the other two is negative) we get a smaller value for the enthalpy change of formation thus bringing us closer to the theoretical value. The biggest weakness in this lab was the impurity of the substances, the assumptions that we made about the HCl solution, for example, we assumed that the specific heat capacity of the solution is the same as water, which is an assumption that is not a 100% accurate and affected our ?H values for both reactions and eventually our final ?Hf value. To fix this, In the different range of specific heat capacity values, 4.10 j/g k would have been more appropriate to get closer to our theoretical values, as you get a bigger qrxn values thus bigger ?H values. Another thing that I noticed is that the theoretical value that I got was the ?Standard? enthalpy change of formation. Standard meaning at standard conditions which are at 293 K and 101.3 kPa for pressure. These weren?t the conditions in the lab when I did the experiment. This might alter the experimental value closer to the theoretical value reducing the percent error. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

1. hess's law

2 spatulas > A 50 cm3 measuring cylinder > Ceramic gauze > A 100 cm3 beaker > Bunsen burner > Thermometer > A stop watch Chemicals Used: > Distilled water > Copper (II) Sulphate pentahydrate Diagram; Procedure: 1. First I measured 50 cm3 of distilled water using a measuring cylinder and poured it into a polystyrene cup.

2. Rates of Reaction Lab

An example of this is the experiment undergone. With reference to the results from this experiment, it is understandable that the collision theory is correct in practice and my hypothesis is correct. Both my graph and my experimental data explain the effect of increasing concentration on the reaction rates of zinc at constant mass.

1. The Enthalpy of Neutralization

+ H2SO4(aq)--> Na2SO4(aq) + 2H2O(l) Finding the Moles of Water Moles of sulfuric acid: [Volume x Concentration] 0.025dm3 x 2.00mol�dm-3 = 0.050mol H2SO4 Moles of sodium hydroxide: [Volume x Concentration] 0.025dm3 x 4.00mol�dm-3 = 0.100mol NaOH (x2) = 0.200mol NaOH Moles of water: [Equal to moles of limiting reagent] 0.050mol H2SO4 --> 0.050mol H2O(x2)

2. IB Chemistry - Boyle's Law Lab Report

I think that was because of the supporting thing which was the top of the syringe where we put the books. It seemed that it had reasonable weight as much as a book had. Secondly, there were huge uncertainties between theory and my experiment as we can assume that the experiment is not reliable.

1. Acids/Bases Design Lab. How does a change in the pH value of a solution ...

5. The 50.0cm3 graduated cylinder, now containing approximately 17.0cm3 of hydrochloric acid solution, was filled with distilled water until the volume read 30.0cm3. Record the volume measured of the hydrochloric acid solution contained in the 50.0 cm3 graduated cylinder. 6. The hydrochloric acid solution in the 50.0cm3 graduated cylinder, was emptied into a 50cm3 beaker.

2. Chemistry Lab Report- Determining the Enthalpy of Enthalpy Change, H, for a Redox Reaction ...

x Specific heat capacity (c) x Temperature change (?T) The standard specific heat capacity of water is 4.18 kJ per kg per kelvin. This means that it requires 4.18 kilojoules (kJ) of energy to raise the temperature of one kilogram of water by one kelvin.

1. The aim of this experiment is to examine the enthalpy of combustion of the ...

24.0 24.0 24.0 0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 15 28.5 29.0 30.5 29.0 30 31.0 33.0 34.0 33.0 45 39.0 36.0 37.0 37.0 60 43.0 45.0 46.5 45.0 75 46.5 47.5 48.0 47.5 90 50.0 52.0 53.0 52.0 105 60.0 61.5 62.0 61.0 120 67.5 66.0 67.5 67.5 135 77.5

2. IB Chemistry Lab Design - compare the effect of temperature on the concentrations of ...

Weighing Scale 1. Bunsen Burner 1. Tripod Stand 1. Wire Gauze 1. Mortar and Pestle 1. Pipette Filler 1. Lid (for beaker) ? 4 1. Thermometer Procedure: Preparing Ascorbic Acid Solution of concentration 0.002 M 1. Measure 3.52 g of L-ascorbic acid using the weighing scale and the weighing boat (which has to be completely dry). • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to
improve your own work 