• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of empirical formula lab report

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SECONDARY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY Lab report: DETERMINATION OF EMPIRICAL FORMULA Done by: X IB1 November 13, 2008 I. Data Collection and Processing: 1- Data Collection: a) Quantitative Data: Table 1: Masses of material used or produced in the experiment Weighed Material Mass (� 0.001 g) Empty crucible + lid 15.313 Crucible + lid + magnesium before heating 15.336 Crucible + lid + combustion product 15.351 b) Qualitative Data: * At the beginning of the experiment, the magnesium ribbon appeared a silver one-piece thin ribbon. * During the course of heating, the ribbon was transforming gradually into a white/gray product. Moreover, the heating process was attended by ignition of the crucible content and formation of smoke. ...read more.

Middle

= m (MgxOy) - m (Mg) = 0.038 - 0.023 = 0.015 � 0.004 g d. Calculation of the Moles of Oxygen and Magnesium: n (Mg) = m (Mg) � M(Mg) = 0.023 g � 24.31 g.mol-1 = 0.00095 mol (uncertainty to be found in the next question) n (O) = m (O) � M (O) = 0.015 g � 16.00 g.mol-1 = 0.0009 mol (uncertainty to be found in the next question) e. Determination of Uncertainties In Moles: Since the molar mass is a definitional quantity, its uncertainty is zero, thus: ?n (Mg) = 1/24.31 (� 0.002) = � 0.00008 mol ?n (O) = 1/16.00 (� 0.004) ...read more.

Conclusion

2) Evaluating the Procedure: * The Percentage of Purity of Initial Mg: The initial reactant is not 100% pure Mg, otherwise the number of moles of both Mg and O would have been exactly equal, which is not the case. * Side Reactions That Might Have Occurred: * End of the Reaction: After heating the crucible, its lid and the magnesium for almost 10-13 minutes, I noticed that gray powder was no longer forming so I decided that the reaction was over. 3) Improving the Investigation: * The Bunsen Burner was not well functioning so it took us a lot of time to get to the perfect flame. * When the magnesium began to bum, we didn't remove the burner; we kept it until the end of the experiment which we shouldn't have done. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Enthalpy of Combustion Lab Report

    Dependant Variables: In the conducted experimental procedure, the temperature of the measured mass of water in the calorimeter is the dependent variable. As the amount of ethanol used in the experimental procedure differs, the temperature of the mass of water will also change depending on the amount of ethanol used.

  2. Enthalpy of Combustion of Alcohols Lab

    it gives prevents heat from escaping while beaker has no such capability to prevent heat escape into the atmosphere. However, a calorimeter would take much more time to heat the water inside. Therefore, by having a time extension, we would be able to use a calorimeter and therefore, it will give us a much more accurate value.

  1. Experiment - The Empirical Formula of Magnesium Oxide

    of magnesium and magnesium oxide, i.e., the absolute uncertainty of oxygen = � (0.002 + 0.002) = � 0.004g No. of moles of magnesium, oxygen The formula was employed, MM (Mg) = 24.31g/mol, MM (O) =16.00g/mol, the masses has already been calculated above.

  2. Change of Potential Difference in Voltaic Cells Lab Report

    Copper Sulfate pentahydrate is known as a hazardous chemical. Avoid direct skin contact (irritant), eye contact (irritant), ingestion and inhalation. Do not ingest. Do not breathe dust. Wear suitable protective clothing. In case of insufficient ventilation, wear suitable respiratory equipment. If ingested, seek medical advice immediately and show the container or the label. Avoid contact with skin and eyes.

  1. Lab Experiment : The change in mass when magnesium burns. (Finding the empirical formula ...

    + 0.0001= 0.2240g (The mass of magnesium ribbon = The mass of the crucible, lid and magnesium- mass of the crucible and lid) 2.Mass of oxygen that combine with Mg ( in grams) +0.0001= 0.1133g (Mass of oxygen = mass of magnesium oxide, crucible, lid - mass of magnesium, crucible, lid)

  2. To determine the standard enthalpy of formation of Magnesium Oxide using Hess Law.

    = 15 × 4.2 × 8.6 = 541.8J Number of MgCl2 produced = 0.0021moles Std. Enthalpy of reaction for this trial = ΔHX (Trial 2) = 258000J = 258kJ.mol-1. To find the average value for ΔHX, the average of ΔHX (Trial 1)

  1. Discovering the formula of MgO

    5,80 4 0,076 10,864 10,984 0,120 0,044 36,6 8,32 Mass of Product= (Mass of crucible with product)-(Mass of crucible) Uncertainty in mass of product= (Uncertainty in mass of crucible with product) + (Uncertainty in mass of crucible) =0,001+0,001=±0,002 Mass of Oxygen== (Mass of product)-(Mass of magnesium)

  2. Finding thr Percentage Composition of Magnesium Oxide

    Conclusion By carefully applying heat and oxygen to a strip of pure magnesium, it was demonstrated that magnesium oxide was formed. The theoretical percentage composition of magnesium in magnesium oxide is 60.31%, although the actual percentage composition was 61.76%. The hypothesis was deemed unsuccessful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work