• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of empirical formula lab report

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SECONDARY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY Lab report: DETERMINATION OF EMPIRICAL FORMULA Done by: X IB1 November 13, 2008 I. Data Collection and Processing: 1- Data Collection: a) Quantitative Data: Table 1: Masses of material used or produced in the experiment Weighed Material Mass (� 0.001 g) Empty crucible + lid 15.313 Crucible + lid + magnesium before heating 15.336 Crucible + lid + combustion product 15.351 b) Qualitative Data: * At the beginning of the experiment, the magnesium ribbon appeared a silver one-piece thin ribbon. * During the course of heating, the ribbon was transforming gradually into a white/gray product. Moreover, the heating process was attended by ignition of the crucible content and formation of smoke. ...read more.

Middle

= m (MgxOy) - m (Mg) = 0.038 - 0.023 = 0.015 � 0.004 g d. Calculation of the Moles of Oxygen and Magnesium: n (Mg) = m (Mg) � M(Mg) = 0.023 g � 24.31 g.mol-1 = 0.00095 mol (uncertainty to be found in the next question) n (O) = m (O) � M (O) = 0.015 g � 16.00 g.mol-1 = 0.0009 mol (uncertainty to be found in the next question) e. Determination of Uncertainties In Moles: Since the molar mass is a definitional quantity, its uncertainty is zero, thus: ?n (Mg) = 1/24.31 (� 0.002) = � 0.00008 mol ?n (O) = 1/16.00 (� 0.004) ...read more.

Conclusion

2) Evaluating the Procedure: * The Percentage of Purity of Initial Mg: The initial reactant is not 100% pure Mg, otherwise the number of moles of both Mg and O would have been exactly equal, which is not the case. * Side Reactions That Might Have Occurred: * End of the Reaction: After heating the crucible, its lid and the magnesium for almost 10-13 minutes, I noticed that gray powder was no longer forming so I decided that the reaction was over. 3) Improving the Investigation: * The Bunsen Burner was not well functioning so it took us a lot of time to get to the perfect flame. * When the magnesium began to bum, we didn't remove the burner; we kept it until the end of the experiment which we shouldn't have done. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Enthalpy of Combustion Lab Report

    This has been changed for each trial in order to provide more accuracy to the experiment. 3. The mass of the distilled water used in the experimental procedure is an independent variable. This has also been changed for each trial in order to provide a variety of results and cover all aspects of the experimental procedure.

  2. Experiment - The Empirical Formula of Magnesium Oxide

    =16.00g/mol, the masses has already been calculated above. Thus, substitute the values into the formula: n(Mg)=0.086/24.31=3.5*10^-3mol n(O)=0.057/16.00=3.6*10^-3mol The results gained were rounded up to 3 decimals so that they are consistent with the absolute uncertainties. Percentage uncertainties associated with masses and number of moles Due to division was employed; the absolute uncertainties of the mass of each element

  1. acid base lab report

    moles = 0.1 M HCl 0.050 L = 0.0050 mol HCl Since our the goal pH is 6 (acidic) acid must be left over. Therefore the volume of NaOH added is unknown (z) Mol NaOH = 0.1 M(z) The total number of final moles of HCl: Mol HCl final =

  2. Enthalpy of Combustion of Alcohols Lab

    would prevent heat loss and this will improve the experiment by giving us a more accurate result. Also, the distance between the alcohol lamp flame and the beaker can be decreased so as to prevent as much energy loss as possible as less heat energy will escape to the surroundings and more will go into the beaker itself.

  1. Combustion of alcohols lab report

    I think the principal sources of error in this experiment were the slight differences in some of the variables, and the loss of heat to the surroundings. The room temperature might have acted as a cooling agent, the calorimeter being copper means that it loses heat as easily as it

  2. Lab Experiment : The change in mass when magnesium burns. (Finding the empirical formula ...

    3.Number of moles of magnesium. = 0.0091 Mole (the number of moles of magnesium = mass / atomic weight . the atomic weight of magnesium is 24.3 g / mole ) 4.Number of moles of oxygen atoms that were used.

  1. Discovering the formula of MgO

    each time we repeated the experiment, which suggests this formula of magnesium oxide (MgO). The percentage errors for each reading are included in the processed table above. We take our most accurate result which gives the percentage composition of oxygen (38, 1%)

  2. To determine the standard enthalpy of formation of Magnesium Oxide using Hess Law.

    = 15 × 4.2 × 8.6 = 541.8J Number of MgCl2 produced = 0.0021moles Std. Enthalpy of reaction for this trial = ΔHX (Trial 2) = 258000J = 258kJ.mol-1. To find the average value for ΔHX, the average of ΔHX (Trial 1)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work