• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determining Ka by the half-titration of a weak acid

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Determining Ka by the half-titration of a weak acid To get the Ka of acetic acid, HC2H3O2 I will react it with sodium hydroxide. The point when our reaction is half-titrated can be used to determine the pKa. As I have added half as many moles of acetic , as NaOH, Thus, OH- will have reacted with only half of the acetic acid leaving a solution with equal moles of HC2H3O2 and C2H3O2-. Then I will use the Henderson-Hasselblach equation to get pKa. CH3COOH + NaOH H2O + NaCH3COO Results: Below is a table that summarizes our results for the reaction of 1M of acetic acid with 1Molar of NaOH which 50cm3 was used. The table shows the PH record at ½ equivalence and at equivalence. We also recorded the observations we saw during the reaction. PH ±0.1 Qualitative observations At ½ equivalence 5.0 When I recorded this, as we slowly added NaOH to the acid, there was a change of color from colorless to a very slight pink as the Phenolphthalein indicator changed color. At equivalence 8.9 As I added the acetic acid to 250 cm3 of reaction mixture, there was no color change. Also as we measured the PH, the PH changed slowly but then changed very quickly at the solution approached equivalence. At this time, the indicator turned pink, when equivalence was reached Calculating the PKa To calculate PKa, we will use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. Hence the calculations below show how using this we can calculate the PKa = PKa + But at the half equivalence, the concentration of acetic acid and its salt ion are the same. ...read more.


Thus method 2, has excellent confident level for its extremely low %error. However the first factor that affects my confidence level is uncertainties. From the %error of PH, we got the %uncertainty of the PKa for method 1. Thus, we know, that from the total % error of 5%, 2% was made by systematic errors i.e uncertainties in this case. Thus the other 3% was caused by random error. Similarly, for method 2, we got % uncertainties for the PH by the volume measure of NaOH. This %error was 4.2%, meaning 4.2% of the total error was caused by systematic error of the graph. Clearly this is bigger than the total %error of 0.84%. Thus this means that actually, even if our graph has on the y-axis an uncertainty of ±0.4, this is an over-estimate. This is since, while we can read a value off with this uncertainty, it can still be very close to the actual half-equivalence PH. Thus this increases my confidence level, as it shows, that the systematic error of the graph y-axis uncertainty is very limited. Thus the biggest error is random error. This occurs when estimating the equivalence point from the titration graph, which is random error as itâs an estimate of the steepest point and hence has no uncertainty. Thus as we could underestimate or overestimate this value, it creates error, as we calculated the half equivalence from it. In this case, clearly we overestimated it as; the PKa from this method is higher than the actual one. ...read more.


Also, as the colorimeter is accurate, systematic error will also be limited. Another way we can improve is in the systematic errors. The first problem was measuring accurately volumes. As the pipettes had big uncertainties, the volume recorded had high %uncertainties. If we however use micropipettes, which have ±0.01 cm3 uncertainties, our volumes will be extremely accurate. Hence %uncertainties will be minimal. Also micropipettes allow much easier for drops of base to be dropped. Thus the significance of this improvement is that when we measure volumes, the equivalence point will occur, more exactly as we will be less likely to overshoot the solution. Finally to solve the inaccurate measurements of PH we can get a PH sensor and data logger. These do real-time measurements and will state the PH with less uncertainty. It will also provide an alternative method for calculating the half-point. As the data logger draws the graph of the titration done, it can calculate the point with the highest gradient. Thus this will be the equivalence point. Hence we can calculate the PH at half the equivalence point of the graph as this is half the volume of base at equivalence. Thus clearly calculating a very accurate PH from the curve. The significance of this will be that it is a major improvement on method 2 and 1 as it is not qualitative. Thus it does not allow for human error. Hence as the sensor is also very accurate systematic error will also be limited as well as random error. Thus this method will get a very accurate PKa with low systematic and random errors. ________________ [1] IB chemistry data booklet pg 13 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Acids/Bases Design Lab. How does a change in the pH value of a solution ...

    Another clean, dry, and empty 50cm3 beaker, labeled 'Beaker CRT1' was massed out on the electronic milligram balance. Its mass was recorded to the nearest 0.001g. 12. After exactly 1 minute has elapsed, the 500cm3 beaker labeled CT1 was decanted of its hydrochloric acid solution, making sure that the zinc metal strip remained.

  2. pKa. When constant successive portions of Sodium Hydroxide are added to Acetic Acid; how ...

    is called the buffer region. In this part of the pH scale, that the Acetic acid and Sodium hydroxide are both preset in significant concentrations and the solution resists changes in pH. In the middle of the buffer region lies the half equivalence point.

  1. A Comparison of Strong and Weak Acids and Bases

    dissociated fully as it is a strong base. Thus, the concentration of NaOH(aq) will equals to the concentration of Na+(aq) and OH-(aq). Therefore, the concentration of OH-(aq) is 0.01M. Thus, Table 2.0: The theoretical pH values of H2SO4(aq), HCl(aq), HNO3(aq), and NaOH(aq)

  2. Strong and Weak Acids And Bases

    + NaOH (aq) --> H2O (l) + Na (CH3COO) (aq) Molarities 1.0M 1.0M Volume 10ml ? It is a one-one ratio so: 1.0molHCl= 1mol NaOH= 10.0ml NaOH theoretically is needed Table 8- Titration of Acids (Experimental Values) Volume of 1.0M NaOH ± 0.02ml Acid Volume of Acid ± 0.02ml Initial ± 0.02ml Final ± 0.02ml Total (Final-Initial)

  1. Melting and Freezing point of naphthalene

    Based on the graph and observation, the melting point of naphthalene is 90.0°C and the freezing point of naphthalene is 77.5° C. My melting point estimates compare with the accepted value of 80.3°C by 8.4% and my freezing point estimates compare with the accepted value of 80.3°C by 6.6%.

  2. Chemistry Titration Acid Base Lab

    Another error was that there were bubbles in the burette tube. When the sodium hydroxide solution was poured in the burette it was done quite quickly creating many bubbles in the beaker. Unfortunately, my group could not afford rinsing the solution out and pouring in more sodium hydroxide solution because

  1. Measuring the fatty acid percentage of the reused sunflower oil after numerous times of ...

    As a result trans- unsaturated oils have high melting points. And the higher melting point increases the number of frying that can be made by using trans-oils. So it can be seen that another property apart from taste and cheapness is being reusable.

  2. Chemistry: Strong Acid and Weak Base Titration Lab

    Cb = (0.84 ± 1.69%) / (9.2 ± 1.09%) Cb = 0.0913 ± 2.78% ï  0.0913 ± 0.00254M is the concentration of the base for trial 1 Theoretical Base Concentration = 0.1 ± 0.0005 M Experimental Base Concentration = 0.0913 ± 0.00254 M Trial 2 Calculation: First find change of volume of the acid used up in the titration:

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work