• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6

# Determining the Activation Energy of a Reaction

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Determining the Activation Energy of a Reaction Submitted by: First Name, Las Name Submitted to: Teacher Name Date Submitted: Date Course: IB HL Chemistry Data Collection and Processing Temperature (�C � 0.2�C) Reaction Time - 2 trials (s � 0.2 s) 2.5 2103.1 - 12.5 676.4 710.9 20.5 362.6 405.4 33.5 131.3 138.6 To find the Activation Energy, the value for "k" needs to be found. Since: Initial Rate of Reaction = k[KMnO4][H2C2O4] And: Initial Rate of Reaction = ?[KMnO4] ?T Sample Calculation Reaction at 2.5 �C � 0.2�C Initial Rate of Reaction = ?[KMnO4] ?T = (0 mol dm-3 - 0.02 mol dm-3) / 2103.1 s = 9.50977129 x 10-6 mol dm-3 s-1 Note: Significant figures will be taken in final equation (finding activation energy) If these formulas are followed and the appropriate time and in turn rate of reaction are used, the values of k and ln k can be found. ...read more.

Middle

k (mol-1 dm-3 s-1) ln (k) 1/T (K-1) 275.5 9.50977129 x 10-4 -6.958020545 0.0036297641 285.5 0.0028832985 -5.84882033 0.003502627 293.5 0.0052083333 -5.257495372 0.003407155 306.5 0.0148203038 -4.211757159 0.0032626427 Therefore, the points ln k vs 1/T were graphed. They were graphed using Microsoft Excel. A line of best fit was included in order to find the slope ( - EA /R) Line of best fit equation: y = -7387.4x + 19.922 ????ln k = -7387.4 (1/T) + 19.922 To find EA: -7387.4 = -EA / R EA = -7387.4 K-1 mol-1 x 8.134 J K-1mol-1 EA = 60089.1116 J EA = 60 kJ Conclusion Since the literature value for the activation energy of KMnO4 could not be found, the values of other student's calculations which followed the same procedure were obtained. In order to conclude if the EA obtained was an acceptable value, the standard deviation was found. Activation Energies of other students (in kJ) 1. 60 2. 52 3. 63 4. 58 5. 56 6. ...read more.

Conclusion

is included in standard deviation, 53.9 + 5.9 = 59.8 kJ = 60 kJ Therefore it is part of the standard deviation and a suitable activation energy, Evaluation There are a few limitations in the experiment. For example, it was very difficult keeping the temperature of the reaction constant in water baths of 2.5, and 12.5. The rate at which the reaction took place at these temperatures was very low, and therefore it was difficult to keep the temperature constant because the temperature would rise once the ice in the water baths would melt. The errors caused by this could have been reduced slightly by constantly replacing the ice and trying to keep the temperature constant. Since the reaction at 2.5 degrees Celsius was only calculated once, there could have been discrepancies with the time that it reacted. In order to reduce the error, the reaction should have been repeated 3-4 times to get an average time. The other reactions at different temperatures could also have been repeated 3-4 times to get a better average time. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

1. ## Lab - Measuring an Activation Energy

and we clearly know this is not the case. From the graph above, visually we can see that if we were to draw tangents at each of the red points, each one would have a different value, as it should. Graph 2: Temperature (K) vs. Rate (Ksec-1) Again from the graph, we can see that the temperature (K)

2. ## Lab 1 - Determining Hydrate Formulas

Mass given by weighing machine in grams (g) � 0.005g *Percent of Uncertainty = (absolute uncertainty) � actual weight) � 100 {0.005g (absolute uncertainty) � 17.92g (actual weight)} � 100 = 0.028% Percent of Uncertainty = 17.92g � 0.028% No# 4: Mass of crucible, lid, and Zinc(II)

1. ## Determining the activation energy of a reaction, By using the experimental data and the ...

The burette used for measuring the solution's quantity also had an associated uncertainty, which was ml�0.05. Lastly, uncertainties could be found in data collection. This investigation required the experimenter to determine the time of colour change and to press the stopwatch.

2. ## Aim: To calculate the activation energy (EA) for the reaction between Br- and BrO3- ...

Once the contents of the boiling tube were equilibrated to the temperate of the water, the contents of the boiling tubes were mixed together very quickly. As one partner mixed the two solutions together, the other started a timer simultaneously.

1. ## Surface area vs Rate of Reaction

While the second trial with a large CaCO3 chip reacts very slowly even when compared with the other 2 trials CaCO3 Powder The same reactions (just like the CaCO3 chip with HCl) happen when we reacted the CaCO3powder. But this time when we reacted the powder CaCO3 this reaction more

2. ## IB chemistry revision notes

CO2. o AB3-->No lone pairs and three bonding pairs. The shape is Trigonal planar, since all 4 atoms are on the same plane. The bond pairs are polar but the molecule isn't because it is symmetrical. The bond angle is 120�.

1. ## Measuring the fatty acid percentage of the reused sunflower oil after numerous times of ...

of percentage of free fatty acids in the numerous times fried sunflower oil after the calculations and for more clear information about the problems that the decreasing of free fatty acids can cause see conclusion. Calculations to find the free fatty acid percentage: Samples: Sample 1: 5 times fried sunflower

2. ## Reaction Rate

only required an average of 80secs to produce 20mL of H2 gas, where as the most dilute solution trialed (0.5M) required an average of 240secs- more than any other trialed concentration. There is enough evidence to show that unless the data is modified and processed, a linear relationship is not

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to