• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evidence of Chemical Reactions Lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evidence of Chemical Reactions Lab (no design) Malcolm McCulloch Purpose The purpose of this lab is to investigate some of the kinds of evidence that are seen for chemicals changes and reactions. Data Collection (Raw Data) Table 1 Temperature values � 0.5�C Test Reactants Initial Observations Observations at 5mins Observations at 20mins 1 HCl (clear liquid) NaOH (clear liquid) Temp: 23.0�C No visible reaction. Temp: 26.0�C No visible reaction. Temp: 25.0�C No visible reaction. Temp: 24.0�C 2 HCl (clear liquid) CaCO3 (white solid) � CaCO3 sunk to bottom � bubbles on its surface � fizzing noise � still bubbling � still making noise � the liquid looks whitish from so many bubbles � still bubbling � still making noise � bubbles appearing so rapidly that they form a sort of swirling current 3 NaCl (clear liquid) AgNO3 (clear liquid) � AgNO3 turns to consistency of wet tissue paper instantly when drop hits surface � sinks to bottom in such a form � precipitate at bottom � crystal formed floating on the surface of the NaCl � more precipitate at the bottom � crystal has decreased in size (fallen) ...read more.

Middle

- Yes No Yes Yes No � Only measured for Test 1 � Small amounts of gas may not have been noticed Concluding The purpose of this lab is to investigate some of the kinds of evidence that are seen for chemicals changes and reactions. In accordance with the evidence presented above, it can be seen that some of the most common types of evidence are: * Heat - Test 1, for example, had no visible reaction but its temperature instantly rose 3�C as a result of the energy released from the reaction of the acid (HCl) and base (NaOH). * Bubbles - Test 2 bubbled vigorously, showing that a gas was formed as the HCl reacted with the CaCO3. * Noise - the reaction in Test 2 was so intense that it made a fizzing sound. * Precipitate - solid particles (AgCl, Cu(OH)2) are often found floating or sunken in the liquid, a product of the reaction. ...read more.

Conclusion

When considering the purpose, precision and detail are irrelevant. In all reality, this lab was no more complicated than it needed to be, but not too simple either. It actually needs very little in the way of improvement. A few more tests could have been added, such as another one that included a temperature change and another with noise, but also to show types of evidence that were not covered herein, such as the spark and flame that are exhibited by the reactions of alkali metals with water. Improving the Investigation Doing other sorts of measurements - viscosity, mass of precipitate formed relative to amount of reactants, opacity - would allow for greater comparison and presentation, but would not actually be necessary. Using more precise tools and doing more trials would have the same effect, but none of these actually produce more examples of types of reactions, which is the purpose of the lab. This lab could, however, be improved by performing a few more experiments, to include more evidence, such as spark and flame. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. A comparison of various proprieary antacids

    Repeat procedures 3-13 for the other antacids, namely Eno powder( Use one sachet per trial) and Zolicid Gel( use two tea spoons per trial). Nb: When washing the conical flask after each trial, wash in the sink, and then rinse with distilled water.

  2. The purpose of this lab was to observe chemical changes, to write balanced equations, ...

    Take a small strip of magnesium. 2. Record observations. 3. Using tongs, burn the magnesium metal in a Bunsen flame. (do not look directly at the burning magnesium.) 4. Examine the product. 5. Clean Up: Once cooled, place the product into the metal can to allow it time to cool overnight.

  1. flame test lab

    - Eyewashes and showers must be accessible to all chemical laboratories. !!! - Do not consume food and drink in the laboratory. !!! - Wear your googles and gloves to protect your eyes and skin !!! - Move in the labolatory carefully !!!

  2. Research question - How many molecules are there in a liquid drop?

    the average mass of one drop is the final value needed). I have rounded off those averages to three decimal places (instead of one) as the values are very small. The average mass of one drop has been rounded off to the same number of places as the standard deviation, that is two significant figures.

  1. Aim To investigate the chemical properties of alcohol

    + H3O+ The ethoxide ion is more basic than the hydroxide ion, because of the electron pushing tendency of the alkyl group, known as the +I effect. The C2H5 group pushes electrons to the O, increasing the negative charge density on the atom making it ready to accept protons.

  2. Indicator Lab Report - investigating acid-base reactions

    colour change until the equivalence point was reached, when the methyl orange turned from red to yellow. * Data Processing Reaction Equations In each experiment, there is a particular reaction which occurs. Each reaction is unique due to its reactants, and as a result, produces unique products.

  1. Titration Lab

    Method For Data Collection 1. I have weighed out exactly 2.5 grams of AR ammonium iron (II) sulphate crystals, and dissolved them in approximately 40cm� of sulphuric acid solution with a concentration of approximately 1 mol dm-�. 2. I did NOT heat the solution to assist the dissolving of the solution.

  2. Percent Yield Lab. This experiment has proven that KI is the limiting reagent ...

    Conclusion: In conclusion this experiment led students to find the limiting and excess reagent after their prediction of Pb (NO3)2(aq) +2KI (aq) PbI2 (s) + 2KNO3. The limiting reagent in the lab was KI because it had the least moles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work