• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Find out density of metal

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Date: 6/8/2009 DENSITY OF METALS Aim: To investigate the density of different kinds of metal or an alloy of metals Hypothesis: DZn = 7.1 g/ml, DPb = 11.3 g/ml, DCu = 8.9 g/ml, DFe = 7.8 g/ml, DAl = 2.7 g/ml, DBrass 8.5 g/ml ( Source: http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_metals.htm) Variables: i. Independent variables: 2 sets of blocks of diferrent kinds of metal ( Zinc-Zn, Lead-Pb, Copper-Cu, Iron-Fe, Aluminium-Al) and an alloy between copper and zinc (Brass). ii. Dependent variables: mass, volume of the blocks iii. Constant: the same electronic balance 0.01g, the same graduated cylinder 250ml 2ml, water, room temperature Method: Determine the density of the metal blocks by measuring the mass and volume of the blocks, using the formula: Density= Mass/Volume 1. ...read more.

Middle

65 65 65 65 65 65 Run 2 Mass (�0.01g) 108.38 178.80 144.06 125.32 42.25 137.47 Initial volume (�2ml) 150 150 150 150 150 150 Final volume (�2ml) 165 165 165 165 165 165 Observation Bluish pale grey Bluish gray Reddish/ Orange metallic lustre Lustrous silver - grey Grey Silvery yellow * Volume of the block � 4 (ml) = final volume 2 (ml) - initial volume 2 (ml) Ex: Volume of Fe block (Run 1) = (65 2) - (50 2) =15 4(ml) Table 2: Volume of the blocks Zn Pb Cu Fe Al Brass Volume (� 4 ml) Run 1 15 15 15 15 15 15 Run 2 15 15 15 15 15 15 * Average mass �0.01(g) ...read more.

Conclusion

and Fe (% of difference is 2.6% ). However, densities of the other metals are different from the hypothesis: Pb ( % of difference is 11.5%), Cu(% of difference is 12.4%), Al ( % of difference is 11.1%) and Brass (5.9% different from the hypothesis). Evaluation Limitations Effects Improvements Uncertainty of the cylinder is too large (Systematic error) The volumes obtained are not accurate Use a smaller cylinder (100ml) with smaller uncertainty The metal blocks are not pure (Systematic error) The mass obtained is not accurate ( it may get lighter) Use pure metal blocks The number of experiments carried out is not enough (Random error) Figures of mass and volumes read may not be accurate Do the experiment many times ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Reactivity series for common metals experiment.

    copper, and by this it should be first in the reactivity order. i think there are 2 possible ways to explain why this happens: � Since the results we did were not very accurate and Lead and Copper are very close in the reactivity series, maybe we did not noticed

  2. Analysis of Silver in an Alloy

    and a vacuum aspirator was assembled and used to filter the solution. * After the water was turned on and the vacuum aspirator was activated, distilled water from a wash bottle was sprayed to create a seal between the funnel and filter paper.

  1. Absorbance of light by a transition metal complex investigation

    Place the cuvette labeled "0.03125mol" into the colorimeter - press start and stop after getting a constant reading 22) Record the data 23) Repeat steps 21-22 until all labeled cuvettes have been measured for red absorbance Data Table Concentration / mol dm-� Red light (660nm)

  2. Investigating Metal Activity Differences

    2H+ + Cu --> H3PO3 + H2O + Cu2+ Data/Observations: HCl: 1 M Trial 1 Original mass Mass of beaker Mass of Cu Mass of Zn % of Cu % of Zn HCl H2SO4 H3PO4 Trial 2 Original

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work