• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hess's Law. The experiment conducted was meant to determine the enthalpy of formation of MgO(s) and CaO(s)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Hess's Law Data Collection and Processing Table V: Heats of Formation Heat of Formation (kJ/mol) Substance Trial 1 Trial 2 Magnesium oxide - 101.5 � 0.5 - 81.1 � 0.5 Magnesium - 366.1 � 0.4 - 322.2 � 0.4 Calcium oxide N/A - 141.7 � 1.0 Calcium - 192.6 � 0.5 - 173.6 � 0.5 Notes: * The heats of formation were calculated using the formula ?H = Q/nlimiting reactant Ex: Magnesium oxide Trial 1: n(MgO) = (1.08 g � 0.01 g)/40.304 g/mol = 0.026796 mol n(HCl) = (100.0 g � 0.5 g)/36.461 g/mol = 2.7427 mol MgO 1 mol 0.026796 mol ����= ����� = ������������ H2O 1 mol 0.026796 mol HCl 2 mol 2.7427 mol ��� = ����� = ���������� H2O 1 mol 1.3714 mol Therefore MgO is the limiting reactant. Assuming HCl(aq) has the same density as water, the 100.0 mL of HCl(aq) has a mass of 100.0 g. Qsurr = mc?T = (100.0 g)(4.184 J/(g��C)(25.5�C - 19.0�C) = (100.0 g)(4.184 J/g��C)(6.5�C) ...read more.

Middle

+ 2HCl(aq) --> H2(aq) + MgCl2(aq) - 322.2 � 0.4 H2(g) + 1/2O2(g) --> H20(l) - 285.8 Table XI: Enthalpy of Formation of MgO Original Equation Enthalpy of Formation (kJ/mol) Mg(s) + 1/2O2(g) --> MgO(s) - 526.2 � 0.9 Table XII: Enthalpies of Reaction After Manipulating The Given Equations for CaO Manipulated Equation Enthalpy of Reaction (kJ/mol) CaCl2(aq) + H2O(l) --> CaO(s) + 2HCl(aq) 141.7 � 1.0 Ca(s) + 2HCl(aq) --> H2(aq) + CaCl2(aq) - 173.6 � 0.5 H2(g) + 1/2O2(g) --> H20(l) - 285.8 Table XIII: Enthalpy of Formation of CaO Original Equation Enthalpy of Formation (kJ/mol) Ca(s) + 1/2O2(g) --> CaO(s) - 317.7 � 1.5 Notes: * The enthalpy of formation was calculated by adding together the enthalpies of reaction Ex: Combustion of magnesium Trial 1: ?Hf = (101.5 - 366.1 - 285.8)kJ/mol = - 550.4 kJ/mol � 0.9 kJ/mol Error: 0.5 + 0.4 = 0.9 Table XIV: Enthalpy of Formation Averages Original Equation Average Enthalpy of Formation (kJ/mol) Mg(s) ...read more.

Conclusion

was determined experimentally. There were many sources of error that could have accounted for this. When the enthalpy of reaction for magnesium was calculated, the magnesium was first sanded with sandpaper to remove and magnesium oxide that had formed on it. Similarly, calcium oxide forms on calcium, however no attempt was made to remove the calcium oxide. This would mean that more moles of calcium were accounted for than were actually present, and that calcium oxide was also reacting but this was not recorded and the amount of calcium oxide was not measured. As is visible in Table VIII, the enthalpy of reaction of calcium is greater than that of calcium oxide. Since it was not all calcium and some calcium oxide reacting in the trial that was meant to be only calcium, the calcium oxide could be responsible for the enthalpy of reaction being lower than the accepted value. This difference between the magnesium and calcium experiments could be one source of error accounting for the large difference in percent error between the two. The experiment could be improved by sanding the calcium as well. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Experiment - The Empirical Formula of Magnesium Oxide

    Thus, the gradient of the scatter graph ought to be 1; though in the first graph the gradient is 0.6. After the elimination of the anomalous, the gradient became 0.7 which is closer to 1.0. It can be deduced that the off-true-value gradient was caused by some outlier points.

  2. Lab Experiment : The change in mass when magnesium burns. (Finding the empirical formula ...

    The atomic weight of magnesium is 24.3 g / mole ) 4.Number of moles of oxygen atoms that were used. = 0.0142Mole (the number of moles of oxygen = mass / atomic weight . The atomic weight of magnesium is 16.0 g / mole )

  1. IB chemistry revision notes

    * Properties o Outside the molecule --> intermolecular forces are weak. o Inside the molecule -->intermolecular forces are strong. o Low m.p.t. and b.p.t. o At room temp --> often gas or liquid. o Do not conduct electricity. o Dissolve in organic solvents.

  2. The Enthalpy of Neutralization

    + HNO3(aq)--> NaNO3(aq) + H2O(l) Finding the Moles of Water Moles of nitric acid: [Volume x Concentration] 0.025dm3 x 2.00mol�dm-3 = 0.050mol HCl Moles of sodium hydroxide: [Volume x Concentration] 0.025dm3 x 2.00mol�dm-3 = 0.050mol KOH Moles of water: [Equal to moles of limiting reagent] 0.050mol H2O Calculating Enthalpy of

  1. The aim of this experiment is to examine the enthalpy of combustion of the ...

    Therefore mass of water can be calcukated from here, if we assume that the density of water is ? (H2O) = 1.0 g cm-3 . From here we can find the mass of water : m (H2O) = ? (H2O)

  2. To determine the standard enthalpy of formation of Magnesium Oxide using Hess Law.

    are as follows: 1. Mg (s) + 2HCl (aq.) ? MgCl2 (aq.) + H2 (g) ---------- ?HX 2. MgO (s) + 2HCl (aq.) ? MgCl2 (aq.) + H2O (g) ---------- ?HY 3. H2 (g) + O2 (g) ? H2O (l) ---------- ?HH2O = -285 kJ.mol-1 Adding all the three reactions, we obtained the following reaction: Mg (s)

  1. Discovering the formula of MgO

    0,062 /16,000 = 0,004 Dividing by the smallest ratio: we get ratio approx. 1 Mg : 1O This would suggest a formula of MgO, which is the correct formula. Hence we prove that the equation is: 2Mg + O2? 2MgO.

  2. Chemistry Lab Report- Determining the Enthalpy of Enthalpy Change, H, for a Redox Reaction ...

    x 100% =2.6% Total %Uncertainty error of Cu + Zn2+=5.14% 5.14%= random error This is the total random error caused by recording our results with the use of instruments, including the digital instruments and as well as the analogue instrument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work