• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Indirect thermometric Titration.

Extracts from this document...


* School Name: Al Mashrek International School * School Code: 2108 * Subject: Chemistry * Topic: Indirect A thermometric Titration. * Assessment: Data Collection, Data Processing & Presenting, Conclusion & Evaluation. * Candidate Name: Bassam Al-Nawaiseh * Date: 20/5/2007 * Aim: The aim of this experiment is to determine the concentrations of two acids. The two acids are Hydrochloric acid, HCl, and Ethanoic acid, CH3CO2H. This will be done by thermometric titration, by calculating the enthalpy change for each reaction, enthalpy of neutralization. * Data Collection: Table 1: the temperature change for the HCl solution and CH3CO2H solution after adding 5 cm� portions of 1M NaOH on each acid. Volume of NaOH / cm� �0.05 Temperature / �C �0.5 Hydrochloric Acid Ethanoic Acid Initial 23 23 5 26 26 10 28 28 15 29 29 20 31 31 25 32 32 30 34 32 35 31 31 40 30 30 45 30 30 50 30 30 * Data Processing & Presenting: Graph 1: represents the temperature change in the solution when titrated with HCl after extrapolation. ...read more.


= - 62.7 KJ/mol * Amount of Heat Energy for Ethanoic Acid Solution = m x s x ?T = (100/1000) x 4.18 x (34 - 23) = 4.56 KJ * Molar Heat Energy for Ethanoic Acid solution =- 4.56 x (1 / 0.1) = -45.6 KJ/mol. (Negative sign was added to both the heat energies because the reaction is exothermic due to the rise in temperature of the solution.) * Conclusion & Evaluation: * ?H neutralization for Ethanoic Acid (-45.6 KJ/mol) is lower than that for Hydrochloric Acid (-62.7 KJ/mol). This is because HCL is a strong acid which completely ionizes and dissociates. On the other hand, CH3COOH is a weak acid which partially ionizes in water. * Percentage Uncertainties is: * Pipette (Volume of NaOH): (0.1/50) x100 = 0.20% * Burette (Volume of HCL): (0.05/50) x 100 = 0.10% * Burette (Volume of CH3COOH): (0.05/50) ...read more.


3. While stirring, the thermometer hit the bottom of the polystyrene cup which caused the thermometer to take the temperature of the cup instead of the water. This affected the readings of temperatures in different intervals which caused an error in drawing the graph. 4. Stirring of the solution was not constant all over the reaction, which caused a partial gain of heat. * Improvements: 1. The polystyrene cup should be covered with a lid, which will increase its insulation and will decrease the amount of heat lost to the surrounding. 2. The thermometer should not hit the bottom of the cup when stirring and friction should be reduced to maximum. This can be done by either holding the thermometer accurately up from the bottom. Or by adjusting it into a clamp embedding it in the solution, while using a glass rod for stirring. 3. Stirring the solution should be constant all over the reaction in order to have accurate readings during all time intervals, which will make the graph and its extrapolating more accurate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Thermodynamics: Enthalpy of Neutralization and Calorimetry

    The lid is placed and the water is stirred for about a minute and afterwards the temperature of the water is taken again (during the one minute, the thermometer should be cooled in a cup filled with room temperature water).

  2. The Enthalpy of Neutralization

    Notably however, was that the mixture of any two reagents gave off heat; meaning that the reaction in all cases was definitely exothermic. But again this was to be expected. Any change in temperature of the two aqueous reagents whatsoever was to be expected, as that is what we were looking to measure and observe in the first place.

  1. A Comparison of Strong and Weak Acids and Bases

    And the accuracy for the probe was �1%. This concludes to the uncertainty being �200�s as * Due to the different conductivity probe range, a separate table for NH3(aq) was made. Table 2.0: The conductivity of NH3(aq). Solution Concentration of solution / mol dm-3 Conductivity of solution / �s (� 20 �s )

  2. Strong and Weak Acids And Bases

    Rate of Reaction(Experimental) Observations Mg + 2HCl -->H2 (g) + MgCl2 Fast Fast Bubbles, foggy, H2 gas forming Zn + 2HCl -->H2 (g) + ZnCl2 Slow Slow Bubbles, foggy, H2 gas forming Cu + 2HCl -->H2 (g) + CuCl2 Slow Slow Bubbles, foggy, H2 gas forming Table 6 -3M Ethanoic Acid Reaction Prediction of Rate of Reaction (Theoretical)

  1. alkali titration

    How accurately can you quote your answer? Balance = �0.02g Volumetric flask = �0.15mL Pipette = �0.04cm3 Burette = �0.15cm3 The equipments used were relatively accurate as the uncertainties compared to the collected values are small. 2. Compare your answer with the correct answer and work out the percentage error.

  2. Determining energy change by indirect methods

    Trial 1 Initial temperature 23.5 23.5 + 0.5�C Final temperature 32.5 38.5 + 0.5�C Change in temperature 9 15.0 + 0.5�C Trial 2 Initial temperature 23.5 23.5 + 0.5�C Final temperature 33.5 38.7 + 0.5�C Change in temperature 10 15.2 + 0.5�C Therefore, * The average change in temperature for Mg is (9+10)/2=9.5�C or 9.5K.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work