• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Indirect thermometric Titration.

Extracts from this document...


* School Name: Al Mashrek International School * School Code: 2108 * Subject: Chemistry * Topic: Indirect A thermometric Titration. * Assessment: Data Collection, Data Processing & Presenting, Conclusion & Evaluation. * Candidate Name: Bassam Al-Nawaiseh * Date: 20/5/2007 * Aim: The aim of this experiment is to determine the concentrations of two acids. The two acids are Hydrochloric acid, HCl, and Ethanoic acid, CH3CO2H. This will be done by thermometric titration, by calculating the enthalpy change for each reaction, enthalpy of neutralization. * Data Collection: Table 1: the temperature change for the HCl solution and CH3CO2H solution after adding 5 cm� portions of 1M NaOH on each acid. Volume of NaOH / cm� �0.05 Temperature / �C �0.5 Hydrochloric Acid Ethanoic Acid Initial 23 23 5 26 26 10 28 28 15 29 29 20 31 31 25 32 32 30 34 32 35 31 31 40 30 30 45 30 30 50 30 30 * Data Processing & Presenting: Graph 1: represents the temperature change in the solution when titrated with HCl after extrapolation. ...read more.


= - 62.7 KJ/mol * Amount of Heat Energy for Ethanoic Acid Solution = m x s x ?T = (100/1000) x 4.18 x (34 - 23) = 4.56 KJ * Molar Heat Energy for Ethanoic Acid solution =- 4.56 x (1 / 0.1) = -45.6 KJ/mol. (Negative sign was added to both the heat energies because the reaction is exothermic due to the rise in temperature of the solution.) * Conclusion & Evaluation: * ?H neutralization for Ethanoic Acid (-45.6 KJ/mol) is lower than that for Hydrochloric Acid (-62.7 KJ/mol). This is because HCL is a strong acid which completely ionizes and dissociates. On the other hand, CH3COOH is a weak acid which partially ionizes in water. * Percentage Uncertainties is: * Pipette (Volume of NaOH): (0.1/50) x100 = 0.20% * Burette (Volume of HCL): (0.05/50) x 100 = 0.10% * Burette (Volume of CH3COOH): (0.05/50) ...read more.


3. While stirring, the thermometer hit the bottom of the polystyrene cup which caused the thermometer to take the temperature of the cup instead of the water. This affected the readings of temperatures in different intervals which caused an error in drawing the graph. 4. Stirring of the solution was not constant all over the reaction, which caused a partial gain of heat. * Improvements: 1. The polystyrene cup should be covered with a lid, which will increase its insulation and will decrease the amount of heat lost to the surrounding. 2. The thermometer should not hit the bottom of the cup when stirring and friction should be reduced to maximum. This can be done by either holding the thermometer accurately up from the bottom. Or by adjusting it into a clamp embedding it in the solution, while using a glass rod for stirring. 3. Stirring the solution should be constant all over the reaction in order to have accurate readings during all time intervals, which will make the graph and its extrapolating more accurate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. The Enthalpy of Neutralization

    x 100 = Percentage error of recorded temperature] (1�12)x100= 8.3% [Percentage value of volume error + percentage value of temperature error = relative error] 2%+8.3% = 10.3% relative error Enthalpy change in joules with relative error percentage Q= -2508J � 10.3% Conversion of Relative Error to Absolute Error (2508�100)

  2. Thermodynamics: Enthalpy of Neutralization and Calorimetry

    heat of neutralization with the formula q neutralization cal = (m �?T � s)Solution + (Heat Capacity � ?T)calorimeter Results The data presented below is relevant to Trial 1 of the experiment. These calculations also include uncertainty and the propagation thereof.

  1. IB chemistry revision notes

    Charge of ions: the higher the charge the greater the attraction between them and thus they require more energy to separate. 3. Type of lattice structure: packing ions determines how close, on average, the ions are to each other. o Brittle--> when a force is applied the lattice varies its arrangement, provoking repulsion between the ions.

  2. A Comparison of Strong and Weak Acids and Bases

    NH3 (aq) 1.00 1138 * The range of the conductivity probe for NH3(aq) was 0�s - 2000�s. And the accuracy for the probe was �1%. This concludes to the uncertainty being �20�s as * Conductivity probe used, also for Table 1.9, was Texas Instruments TI - 83.

  1. Strong and Weak Acids And Bases

    Rate of Reaction(Experimental) Observations Mg2+ + 2CH3COOH-->H2(g) + Mg(CH3COO)2 Fast Moderate Bubbles, foggy, H2 gas forming Zn2+ + 2CH3COOH-->H2(g) + Zn(CH3COO)2 Slow Very Slow Bubbles, foggy, H2 gas forming Cu2+ + 2CH3COOH-->H2(g) + Cu(CH3COO)2 Slow Very Slow Bubbles, foggy, H2 gas forming Experiment #4- Effect of Acid Concentration on Reaction Rate Reaction Mg + 2HCl -->H2 (g)

  2. alkali titration

    the same as concentration of acid in 250mL: c = n/v c = 0.0119�2.03% / 0.25 �(0.15/250 x 100%) c = 0.0476 � (2.03+0.06)% ? c = 0.05 mols dm-3 �2.09% (concentration of acid) c = n/v 0.05�2.09% = n / 0.25 �0.06% 0.05�2.09% x 0.25�0.06% = n ?

  1. Determining energy change by indirect methods

    Trial 1 Initial temperature 23.5 23.5 + 0.5�C Final temperature 32.5 38.5 + 0.5�C Change in temperature 9 15.0 + 0.5�C Trial 2 Initial temperature 23.5 23.5 + 0.5�C Final temperature 33.5 38.7 + 0.5�C Change in temperature 10 15.2 + 0.5�C Therefore, * The average change in temperature for Mg is (9+10)/2=9.5�C or 9.5K.

  2. Chemistry Titration Acid Base Lab

    Yashna and Rachel?s groups provided information upon different indicators and some of the ones my group used as well.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work