• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating the formula of an unknown hydrate

Extracts from this document...


Lab Experiment 1: Investigating the formula of an unknown hydrate ] Purpose: To determine the formula of an unknown hydrate using the mass of the hydrate before and after heating to help you. Background Information: Water is a part of many solid ionic compounds. Such compounds are known as hydrates and the water they contain is known as water of hydration. The water of hydration can be driven off by heating the hydrated crystals. The salt that remains after the water is gone is known as the anhydrous salt. In this experiment you will determine the formula of a hydrate. Apparatus: - Crucible - Spatula - Balance � 0.01g - Bunsen burner - Tripod - Wire - Gauze - Crucible tongs - Up to 8 grams of the unknown hydrate. Independent variable: The temperature of the compound. Dependant Variables: The mass of the materials and compound before heating and after. ...read more.


because of the reading in the mass, in which they show up to only 2 decimal points Table2 : After heating Mass of hydrate 4.34g �0.01g Combined mass 25.96 �0.01g 1. Without a doubt, I would have expected that the mass of the hydrated compound to fall down in the mass due to the water loss in the compound by evaporation. 2. Mass of anhydrous = 4.44g Molar mass of anhydrous = 126.14gmol^-1 Number of moles = 4.44g = 0.0352 moles 126.14gmol^-1 3. Mass of water = mass of hydrate (before heating) - mass of hydrate(after heating) Mass of water = 7.45g - 4.32g = 3.13g 4. To determine the formula of the unknown hydrate, we do the following: Mass of water = 3.13g Mass of anhydrous = 4.44g Molar mass of water = 18.02gmol^- Molar mass of anhydrous =126.14gmol^-1 nH20 = m = 3.13 = 0.1737 n anhydrous = m = 4.44 = 0.0352 . ...read more.


One group received 0 while one had 2. This is clearly due to the sources of errors that may have occurred in their experiments. The possible sources off error in this experiment may include: - An appropiate amount of the unknown hydrate may have not been used. - It wasnt left on the heater for enough time to allow complete water loss. - Material used may have been tampered with and so would affect the overall results. - Wrong measurements were taken. - Although my experiment was successful, many improvement could have been made to both my experiment and too the experiment. This includes: - Repeating the measurements for more trials so that more accurate answers could be found. - Using an accurate method to measure the mass, so as to reduce the errors in the experiment. - Make sure that none of the compound is accidentally spilled out. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Experiment - The Empirical Formula of Magnesium Oxide

    Suggested method of improvement Effects after the improvement Completion of the reactions Random error Keep heating the crucible until the magnesium becomes white powder and stop glowing. This allows magnesium to react with oxygen completely; random errors will be reduced.

  2. Lab #2 Water Hydration of Copper(II) Sulfate. Purpose- To determine the formula of ...

    4.6 H2O Class data for Cu(II)SO4 + X H2O 1) 4.61 2) 4.72 3) 4.77 4) 5.25 5) 5.30 6) 5.14 7) 6.20 Conclusions- We demonstrated that by heating five grams of copper(II) sulfate to drive off all the water we were left with 3.35 grams of Cu(II)SO4 and 1.75 grams of water.

  1. Using Solubility Rules to Indentify Unknown Solutions

    = 5% Moles of solute Concentration ( M) = 0.1M = ? x = 0.0002 1% x= 0.0002 2x10-5 g Mass of solute Moles = 2x10 -4 1% = ? x = 2x10 -4 x 58.4 x = 0.1 0.00002g x = 0.1 2x10 -5 Precipitate equation E = XY + PS = XY(aq)+PS(aq)

  2. Lab 1 - Determining Hydrate Formulas

    Sulfate (ZnSO4) after 2nd heating 17.30g There is none because I used a digital device to determine the mass, so I can't have possibly made any mistakes. Mass given by weighing machine in grams (g) � 0.005g *Percent of Uncertainty = (absolute uncertainty)

  1. Lab Experiment : The change in mass when magnesium burns. (Finding the empirical formula ...

    3.Number of moles of magnesium. = 0.0091 Mole (the number of moles of magnesium = mass / atomic weight . the atomic weight of magnesium is 24.3 g / mole ) 4.Number of moles of oxygen atoms that were used.

  2. Determining the Formula of an Unknown Hydrate

    Sulfate Expected- Observed Expected = 5- 4.76950823870913 x 100 5 = 4.609835226 = 4.61% Data Processing Table 3. Mass, molar mass, mole of hydrate and water and water to salt ratio Hydrate Substance Mass of anhydrate salt (g � 0.02)

  1. Tetraamminecopper(II) sulphate hydrate

    So the mass of the final product was 5.98 - 1.16 = 4.82g. Data processing 1. "Calculate the number of moles CuSo4�5H2O used." To find out the number of moles the formula n = m / Mr has to be used.

  2. To determine the molecular mass of an unknown alkali metal carbonate, X2CO3.

    Due to a respectably high accuracy and consistency in all our values, I can conclude with a large magnitude of confidence that the experiment was successful and indeed the compound Z, X2CO3 was Sodium Carbonate, Na2CO3. I feel that one of our major strengths in yielding such accurate results was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work