• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Measuring the Enthalpy Change for the reaction

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Measuring the Enthalpy Change for the reaction between Zinc and Copper Sulphate Solution Equation: Zn(s) + Cu2+ (aq) ---------> Cu(s) + Zn2+ (aq) Results: This table shows how the temperature is affected by the reaction of Zinc and Copper Sulphate throughout the time interval (Zinc powder is added to the Copper Sulphate solution at the fourth minute). Time(minutes)� 0.02 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Temperature �C � 0.2 19.2 19.2 19.2 40.2 45.0 45.2 44.6 43.8 43.2 42.4 41.8 Zinc Mass: 4.761g Observation: 1) To start with, the copper sulphate solution is transparent blue colour. 2) At the fourth minute, using the glass rod to stir the solution as the Zinc powder is placed into the solution, the colour changes into dark turquoise and the solution fizzes due to the chemical change. 3) The Zinc powder then dissolves in the solution. 4) As I stir the solution, the colour changes to grey with black precipitate. 5) Then, the solution gradually changes from grey to black with black precipitate. At the twelfth minute, the black precipitate dissolves yet the solution continues to fizz showing the chemical reaction is still taking place. After collecting the data and recording my observations, I then draw a linear graph in order to work out the temperature rise which occurred at the fourth minute. ...read more.

Middle

First of all, I will work out the maximum percentage error in using each piece of the apparatus. This is to ensure that I have include all the possible errors in the apparatus and so that I can comment on whether if the apparatus contributes in affecting the overall results. The maximum percentage error in apparatus: Error in balance = �0.001g = 0.001 X 100 4.761 = 0.02100 %( 4s.f) Error in the thermometer = �0.2 = 0.2 X 100 28.1 = 0.7117 %( 4s.f) Error in 50ml burette pipette= �0.05 = 0.05 X100 50.0 = 0.1% Overall maximum percentage error= 0.8327% = 0.833% (3s.f) Hence, after working out the maximum percentage error, I can use the figure to estimate the degree of uncertainty in my enthalpy change. The enthalpy change is -235 in 3s.f. I have decided to use 3s.f as an appropriate degree of accuracy so the maximum percentage error 0.8327% will be 0.833% in s.f. In my opinion, the maximum percentage error is small so therefore I don't think it will effect my enthalpy change to an extent as the smaller the number of the maximum percentage error, then the more accurate my enthalpy change will be. I also thought of including the error of the stopwatch but it wouldn't affect the maximum percentage error much so therefore I decided to exclude it from my calculation as the error is tiny and can be discarded. ...read more.

Conclusion

In order to see how well the performance of my results are, I will need to use the theoretical value of the enthalpy change and compare it with the value of my enthalpy change so that I can see how far my value is from the correct value. The theoretical values that I used are from the chemistry data book; JG Stark, H G Wallace, 1982, Chemistry data book, page 57. The values that are used for Copper aq and Zinc aq are: ?hf� (Cu2+ (aq)) = +64.4 ?hf� (Zn2+ (aq)) = -152.4 By using the Hess Law, I will work out the theoretical enthalpy change by using these values from the data book. ?h = -(+64.4) + (-152.4) = -216.8 Kjmol�� I will then compare my value with the theoretical value of the enthalpy change. To do this, i will work out the percentage difference between my experimental value and the theoretical value. This is to see how big the percentage difference between my value and the theoretical value as the smaller the percentage, the more accurate my value will be to the theoretical value. So first, I will work out the difference between my experimental value and the theoretical value. -216.8-(-234.916) = 18.116 Kjmol�� Then, I will use this value to find the percentage difference between my experimental value and the theoretical value. % difference: difference X 100 18.116 theoretical value = -216.8 = -8.35608% = -8.36% (3s.f) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Determining an enthalpy change of reaction

    Sample calculations: 22.5 + 22.5 + 22.5 = 67.5 67.5 / 3 = 22.5?C Time/s 0 30 60 90 120 150 180* 210 240 Temperature/?C 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.6 22.6 22.6 26 31 31.8 Time/s 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 ?

  2. IB chemistry revision notes

    o Endothermic Reactions --> the exact opposite occurs, therefore these prefer higher temperatures, on order to make more products. o Also affects . For exothermic reactions, a rise in T decreases the concentration of products, so the value of decreases.

  1. The Enthalpy of Neutralization

    Calculating Percentage Error of Observed Enthalpy Value [(Observed Value - Expected Value) � Expected Value] x 100 = Percentage error [(-51.2 kJ�mol-1 H2O (� 5.22 kJ�mol-1 H2O) - -57.3 kJ�mol-1) � -57.3 kJ�mol-1] x 100 = 10.6% Experiment 4.2 - Enthalpy of neutralization for sulfuric acid and4.00mol�dm-3 sodium hydroxide 2NaOH(aq)

  2. Thermodynamics: Enthalpy of Neutralization and Calorimetry

    These calculations also include uncertainty and the propagation thereof. All the results for trial 1 and the rest of the trials are placed in charts at the end. Note: whenever s is used below, it represents specific heat. Heat Capacity of Calorimeter Mass of Cold Water 49.951 (�.001)g -7.781(�.001)g 42.170 �.001 g Mass of Hot Water 95.928 (�.001)g -

  1. IA-Enthalpy Change of Reaction - Zinc and Copper Sulphate.

    =CV=(1mol dm-3) (0.025dm3)=0.025mol III. Conclusion and Evaluation Conclusion Calculating Percentage Error: The enthalpy change of this reaction was found as following: is -188.91 kJ mol-1 The theoretical value for the enthalpy change of the reaction is 217 kJ mol-1. X100 X100 Evaluation Potential Sources of Errors * Although precautions were

  2. Electrolysis of copper sulphate

    Now, the positive terminal of the power pack connects to the anodes such that, the first anode connects to the second anode and so on just the like cathodes. Do this systematically from A1 to A5 using alligator clips until 5 anodes are connected in series.

  1. The aim of this experiment is to examine the enthalpy of combustion of the ...

    = 1.59 g ( as decided ) Molar mass of methanol is needed for further calculations and it can be calculated in a following way : M (CH3OH) = Ar (C) + Ar (O) + 4*Ar (H) = 12.01 + 16.00 + 4*1.01 = = 32.05 g mol-1 From here

  2. To determine the standard enthalpy of formation of Magnesium Oxide using Hess Law.

    Using the thermometer, the mixture was very gently stirred for a few seconds. 8. Every five seconds, the reading on the thermometer was read as accurately as possible and noted. 9. For 120 seconds, 24 readings were taken and noted in a pre-made data collection table.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work