• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Tetraamminecopper(II) sulphate hydrate

Extracts from this document...


Tetraamminecopper(II) sulphate hydrate Write-up Purpose The purpose of this experiment is to form tetraamminecopper(II) sulphate hydrate and determine the yield. Materials CuSo4�5H2O NH3 (concentrated) Ethanol 50 cm3 measuring cylinder 250 cm3 beaker Spatula Equipment for vacuum filtration Procedure Weigh out approximately 5.0g of CuSo4�5H2O Dissolve it in 30 cm3 water in the beaker Add 10 cm3 concentrated ammonia (NH3) and stir the solution Add 40 cm3 ethanol and stir carefully for a couple of minutes. Filter the solution through equipment for vacuum filtration. Transfer the product to a clean weighing boat and leave to dry. Procedure and observations in class First 5.01g of CuSo4�5H2O was weighed out. ...read more.


Mr = 64 + 32 + (16 x 4) + (5 x 16) = 250 m = 5.01 n = 5.01 / 250 = 0.02004 � 0.0200 moles (3 s.f.) 2. "Concentrated ammonia contains 25% NH3 by mass. The density of concentrated ammonia is 0.91g/cm3 . Calculate the number of moles of NH3 ." Density of con. ammonia = 0.91g/cm3 and in the procedure there was used 10 cm3, so therefore mass of ammonia used: 0.91 x 10 = 9.1g Since only 25% of ammonia is NH3 , mass of NH3 : 9.1 x 0.25 = 2.275g From here the amount of moles can be calculated by the formula n = m / Mr. Mr = 14 + (1 x 3) ...read more.


5H2O and Cu(NH3)4SO4 . H2O is 1 : 1. Therefore 0.02 moles of CuSO4 . 5H2O will give 0.02 moles of Cu(NH3)4SO4 . H2O. By using the formula m = Mr x n the theoretical yield can be calculated: n = 0.02 Mr = 246 m = 0.02 x 246 = 4.92 g "Calculate the yield in percentage of the theoretical and comment on any difference." The yield in percentage can be calculated by the "formula": actual mass / expected mass. 4.82 / 4.92 � 97.9% (3 s.f) Because the difference is so small (2.1%) the experiment can be considered successful. The difference could have been caused by different things like: a small measurement mistake, a little bit was spilt or not transferred when the solution was held in the Buchner flask. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Lab 1 - Determining Hydrate Formulas

    � 0.005g *Percent of Uncertainty = (absolute uncertainty) � actual weight) � 100 {0.005g (absolute uncertainty) � 17.30g (actual weight)} � 100 = 0.029% Percent of Uncertainty = 17.30g � 0.029% No# 5: Mass of crucible, lid, and Zinc(II) Sulfate (ZnSO4) after 3rd heating 17.29g There is none because I used a digital device to determine the mass, so I can't have possibly made any mistakes.

  2. Can one determine the coefficients of a balanced chemical equation by having the mass ...

    2.48 Mass of Aluminum After Reaction(�0.01g) 1.48 Mass of Copper with Filter Paper(�0.01g) 4.49 Mass of Filter Paper(�0.01g) 0.95 Calculations Mass of Aluminum Reacted Moles of Aluminum Mass of Copper Moles of Copper Mole to Mole Ratio of Aluminum to Copper Converting to a Whole Number Coefficient Balanced Chemical Equation Summary Table - Balanced Chemical Equation

  1. Group 4

    Graph 3 The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution can be shown graphically as the plot of the number of molecules traveling at a given speed versus the speed. As the temperature increases, this curve broadens and extends to higher speeds. As seen in Graph 3, there is a unique distribution curve for each temperature.

  2. Electrolysis of copper sulphate

    Comparison of results The graph above displays both the theoretically calculated mass and the experimentally obtained mass results in respect to current. From this comparison, it can be seen that the results obtained in the experiment are poorly correlated to, and show neither accuracy nor precision to the theoretical mass data.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work