• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2

# Tetraamminecopper(II) sulphate hydrate

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tetraamminecopper(II) sulphate hydrate Write-up Purpose The purpose of this experiment is to form tetraamminecopper(II) sulphate hydrate and determine the yield. Materials CuSo4�5H2O NH3 (concentrated) Ethanol 50 cm3 measuring cylinder 250 cm3 beaker Spatula Equipment for vacuum filtration Procedure Weigh out approximately 5.0g of CuSo4�5H2O Dissolve it in 30 cm3 water in the beaker Add 10 cm3 concentrated ammonia (NH3) and stir the solution Add 40 cm3 ethanol and stir carefully for a couple of minutes. Filter the solution through equipment for vacuum filtration. Transfer the product to a clean weighing boat and leave to dry. Procedure and observations in class First 5.01g of CuSo4�5H2O was weighed out. ...read more.

Middle

Mr = 64 + 32 + (16 x 4) + (5 x 16) = 250 m = 5.01 n = 5.01 / 250 = 0.02004 � 0.0200 moles (3 s.f.) 2. "Concentrated ammonia contains 25% NH3 by mass. The density of concentrated ammonia is 0.91g/cm3 . Calculate the number of moles of NH3 ." Density of con. ammonia = 0.91g/cm3 and in the procedure there was used 10 cm3, so therefore mass of ammonia used: 0.91 x 10 = 9.1g Since only 25% of ammonia is NH3 , mass of NH3 : 9.1 x 0.25 = 2.275g From here the amount of moles can be calculated by the formula n = m / Mr. Mr = 14 + (1 x 3) ...read more.

Conclusion

5H2O and Cu(NH3)4SO4 . H2O is 1 : 1. Therefore 0.02 moles of CuSO4 . 5H2O will give 0.02 moles of Cu(NH3)4SO4 . H2O. By using the formula m = Mr x n the theoretical yield can be calculated: n = 0.02 Mr = 246 m = 0.02 x 246 = 4.92 g "Calculate the yield in percentage of the theoretical and comment on any difference." The yield in percentage can be calculated by the "formula": actual mass / expected mass. 4.82 / 4.92 � 97.9% (3 s.f) Because the difference is so small (2.1%) the experiment can be considered successful. The difference could have been caused by different things like: a small measurement mistake, a little bit was spilt or not transferred when the solution was held in the Buchner flask. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

1. ## Lab 1 - Determining Hydrate Formulas

If you got results that showed the mass decreasing every time you heated the salt for 5 extra minutes, then this means that the water in the salt hasn't completely been evaporated and the hydrate formula is going to turn out to be wrong.

2. ## Can one determine the coefficients of a balanced chemical equation by having the mass ...

This is because the law of conservation of mass states that any quantity you put into the equation you must get out of the equation. This means that the mass of the copper in the copper(ii)

1. ## Group 4

the molecules is small compared to the free space between the molecules, but molecules are as a physical body that moves continually through space in random directions. In a microscopic view, the pressure exerted on the walls of the container is the result of molecules colliding with the walls, and hence exerting force on the walls (Graph 3).

2. ## Electrolysis of copper sulphate

Comparison of results The graph above displays both the theoretically calculated mass and the experimentally obtained mass results in respect to current. From this comparison, it can be seen that the results obtained in the experiment are poorly correlated to, and show neither accuracy nor precision to the theoretical mass data.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to