• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Effect of Concentration on Rate of Reaction

Extracts from this document...


Effect of Concentration on Rate of Reaction -Magnesium and Hydrochloric Acid- Purpose: The aim for this lab is to evaluate the results of the reaction of Magnesium and hydrochloric acid, and to determine if changing the concentration of the acid will have an affect on the rate of reaction. Hypothesis: I hypothesize that a greater concentration of the acid will cause the rate to increase. Variables: -Independent: change of concentration of HCl -Dependent: The rate of reaction between HCl and Mg -Control: Temperature-if assumed room temperature stays constant, amount of Mg used through each trial, & total volume of the liquid for each trial. Materials: -50 mL beaker -stop watch -15 cm of Mg Ribbon -150 mL beaker -450 mL beaker -Graduated Cylinder -50 mL of 12M HCl -520 mL of water -weighing scale -ruler that measures in cm -stirring rod Procedure: 1. Obtain 15 mL of 12M hydrochloric acid using a graduated cylinder. 2. Now acquire 135 mL of water using graduated cylinders for a more accurate volume and pour into the 150 mL beaker. 3. Add the acid to the water and stir. 4. Now attain 15 cm of magnesium ribbon and measure the mass in grams. 5. Cut the ribbon into fifteen 1 cm pieces. 6. Using a graduated cylinder, measure 50 mL of the solution made in step 3 and pour into the 50 mL beaker. ...read more.


It showed a larger growth in time than the previous tests. -I now diluted further and again, the results showed a rather larger growth. The three trials were quite a deal less consistent than previous test. During this specific test I noticed that the pieces of Mg in the last two trials actually sunk to the bottom of the beaker. This was the first time they had done this throughout this entire experiment. -For my last test in this experiment I diluted even further and I noticed again, that the change in time from the previous tests was even more dramatic. I think this could be an example of exponential growth. During the first trial the piece of magnesium sunk to the bottom, but the last two did not. Data Processing: I will be use my data to find the concentrations of HCl for each test using the simple M1V1 = M2V2 formula that uses the first volume multiplied by the original concentration to equal the final volume multiplied by the new concentration. Since I added 15mL of 12M acid to 135 mL of water to use doing during my first test I will set up the formula as follows: (15mL)�(12M) = (135mL + 15mL) �(new concentration). Then I will just multiply and divide to get the answer: 1.2M Due to the fact that I used the same solution to make the rest of the test's solutions, the concentration found in this equation will be used in the remaining four calculations of the concentration of HCl. ...read more.


The following table will show the values I am going to use for the graph. (X) Concentration of HCl (Y) Rate 1.2M (Test 1) 0.00026 M/s 1.0M (Test 2) 0.000165 M/s 0.8M (Test 3) 0.000092 M/s 0.6M (Test 4) 0.000033 M/s 0.4M (Test 5) 0.0000133 M/s Conclusion: From my results in this experiment I can conclude that the higher the concentration the higher the rate will be. Based on this graph I also can assume that the data is exponential due to the curve of the values. However, I think there were errors in the experiment that were due to I wasn't able to measure the magnesium in its individual 1cm pieces of ribbon. I think that caused the rate to possibly be more of an estimation than it's actual. In my 4th test 1st trial the time it took for the magnesium to dissolve was remarkable different than the other two trials. I did not observe any difference than the fact the latter two trials had ribbon that sunk to the bottom of the beaker. I think that having the ribbon more emerged in the solution can cause there to be a decrease in time. Evaluation: I think a weakness in this experiment was I don't think I controlled enough variables. For example, if I had forced all pieces to be fully emerged like a few that happened in the end of the experiment, my data would have more consistent. ?? ?? ?? ?? Rachel Timmons ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Investigate the rate of reaction of luminol in various factors. The objective was to ...

    The table should be drawn as below: Concentration of H2O2 0.15M 0.12M 0.09M 0.06M 0.03M H2O2 5cm3 4cm3 3cm3 2cm3 1cm3 Water 0cm3 1cm3 2cm3 3cm3 4cm3 Time A2. Investigation: rate of reaction in different concentration of Hydrogen peroxide (using 0.3M H2O2)

  2. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the effect varying temperatures have on ...

    strip and record the mass of magnesium strip (Mg) in table with uncertainty (�0.01g). 8. Pour 40mL of hydrochloric acid solution (HCl) into the 50�5mL Beaker. 9. Prepare the water bath, then place the 40mL hydrochloric acid solution in the 50�5mL Beaker in the water bath and set the temperature to 20�C setting on the water bath.

  1. Lab Experiment : The change in mass when magnesium burns. (Finding the empirical formula ...

    Obviously you cannot have a non-integral number in a chemical formula and 1.2 is too far to round down to 1.00, but multiplying it by 5 gives 6. If you multiply Mg by 5, you must do the same to O, so the formula must be Mg6O5.

  2. The Effect of Different Concentrations on the Rate of Reaction between Magnesium Ribbon and ...

    0 21 30 22 60 22 90 24 120 25 150 26 180 26 210 26 240 26 270 29 300 29 Average (cm3/s) = 0.92 Acid Concentration- 4 mol/dm3 Time (seconds) Volume of Carbon dioxide gas given off (cm3)

  1. Determination of the molar mass of Magnesium from the reaction of magnesium and ...

    So for 0.0024 moles of hydrogen gas formed, 0.0024 moles of magnesium must have been used. Mg(s) + 2HCl� h2(g) + mgcl2(aq) One mole excess one mole The molar mass of magnesium can be found using the following formula: Molar mass (M)

  2. Investigating the effect of different liquid densities on the time taken to release ...

    � 5. Alcohols Dependent & independent variables Ethanol Methanol Propan-1-ol Butan-1-ol Octan-1-ol Liquid density / g ml-1 at 20 oC (293K). 0.789 0.791 0.804 0.810 0.826 The mean time taken to release 25 ml of alcohol from a burette / � 0.0100 seconds 39.4 44.0 69.4 81.0 112 Table 2.2

  1. Hydrogen Gas Collection Lab CE (6/6) A sample of solid magnesium ribbon, measuring approximately ...

    work to increase the measurement of what should be only the volume of hydrogen gas collected. Therefore, these pockets of liquid had the effect of increasing the percentage yield of hydrogen gas collected. This source of error could be limited, but likely not eliminated, by reaching into the 1000cm3 graduated

  2. Investigating the Effects of Surface Area on the Rate of Reaction

    The smallest calibration for the glass syringe is 5 cm3. This divided by 2 equals 2.5 cm3. 3. The smallest calibration for the stop-watch is 0.01.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work