• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

Using Solubility Rules to Indentify Unknown Solutions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using Solubility Rules to Indentify Unknown Solutions Chemistry IA In this experiment, known aqueous solutions are combined to investigate whether a precipitate id formed. These results are then used to deduce the identity of two unknown solutions and thus the identity of the precipitate. Table of Contents Focus Question: 2 Hypothesis: 2 Theory: 2 Variables: 3 Control Used for Comparison: 3 Apparatus and Material: 3 Safety Aspects: 4 Protocol and Protocol Diagram: 4 Procedure 4 Modifications to Original Design: 5 Data Collection and Processing: 5 Photograph of Lap Setup: 5 Qualitative Observations and Raw Data: 6 Data Processing 7 Overview: 7 Sample Calculations: 7 Presentation: 8 Conclusion and Evaluation 9 Conclusion and Justification: 9 Limitations to Experimental Design: 10 Suggestions for Improvements: 10 Appendix -1- Table of Ions and Polyatomic Ions 12 Bibliography 14 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Focus Question: Which pairs of 6 ionic combination solutions form precipitates and therefore aid in determining the two unknown solutions? Hypothesis: The two unknown solutions will be determined from chemical reaction observations obtained from pair ionic combinations resulting in precipitate formation. Theory: A solution is a homogeneous mixture that contains a solute dissolved in a solvent. A solution is made by dissolving the required amount of solute in a minimum of solvent. Once the solute has completely dissolved more solvent is added to make the solution up to the desired volume. If water is used as the solvent, the solution formed is called an aqueous solution. The term Molarity (M) is used to express the concentration of a solution, that is, how much solute is dissolved in a certain volume of solvent. A solution with a concentration (Molarity) of 0.1M is called a 0.1 molar solution. Concentration can be calculated by the formula:- Concentration (M) = moles* of solute Volume of solvent (Litres) *Where moles = mass of solute (g) Molar mass of the solute (g) The molar mass of a compound is the total mass of all of the elements in that compound. ...read more.

Middle

of the ionic solutions where not given an uncertainty as they were not created as part of the experimental protocol. They were pre made, thus while there would be an uncertainty attached with their concentration, it cannot be accurately predicted due to the fact that it is unknown as to what apparatus and equipment was used in creating these concentrations. Presentation: Precipitate Equation Ionic Combination Pairs NaOH + MgCl2 BaCl2 + Na2SO4 NaOH + MgSO4 BaCl2 + MgSO4 BaCl2 + NaOH Chemical NaOH(aq) + MgCl2(aq) --> NaCl(aq) + MgOH2 (s) BaCl2 (aq)+ Na2SO4 (aq) --> NaCl (aq) + BaSO4 (s) NaOH (aq) + MgSO4 (aq) --> Na2SO4 (aq) + MgOH2 (s) BaCl2(aq)+MgSO4(aq) --> BaSO4(s) + MgCl2(aq) BaCl2(aq) + NaOH(aq) -->BaOH2(aq)+ NaCl(aq) Ionic Na+ +OH- + Mg2+ +Cl- --> NaCl(aq) + MgOH2 (s) Ba2+ + Cl- + Na- +SO4-2 --> NaCl (aq) + BaSO4 (s) Na+ +OH- + Mg2+ + SO42- --> Na2SO4 (aq) + MgOH2(s) Ba2++Cl- +Mg2+ +SO42- --> BaSO4(s) +MgCl2(aq) Ba2+ + Cl- + Na+ + OH- --> BaOH2(aq)+ NaCl(aq) Net Mg2+(aq) + OH-(aq) --> MgOH2 (s) Ba2+(aq) + SO42-(aq) --> BaSO4 (s) Mg2+(aq) + OH-(aq) --> MgOH2 (s) Ba2+(aq)+ SO42+-->BaSO4 (s) BaCl2(aq)+NaOH(aq)-->BaOH2(aq) + NaCl(aq) Balanced Mg(aq) + 2OH(aq) --> MgOH2(s) Ba (aq) + SO4 (aq) --> BaSO4 (s) Mg(aq) + 2OH(aq) --> MgOH2 (s) Ba(aq) + SO4(aq) -->BaSO4 (s) BaCl2(aq)+2NaOH(aq)-->BaOH2(aq) + 2NaCl(aq) Table 5 Equations for Precipitate Ion combination The table above displays the chemical, ionic, net and balanced equations of the ionic combination pairs which resulted in precipitate formation. From this table, we can determine the spectator ions by comparing the ionic equation to the balanced net equation of each of the combination pairs. Therefore, spectator ions for the NaOH + MgCl2 combination pair are Na+ and Cl- ions as these ions do not undergo any chemical transformation during the reactions. In the same way, solution pair BaCl + Na2SO4 also has its spectator ions being Na+ and Cl- ions. ...read more.

Conclusion

This would also have been as a result from possibly mixing up the labels between the test tubes, thus confusing which ionic solution was which while they were in the test tube rack. The probability that this would have occurred is particularly high, especially due to the fact that the labels associated to their designated micro test tube was not attached to the test tube but instead placed underneath it due to the fact that they were very small. This would therefore be placed as a random error. Cross contamination as a result of not washing the pipettes or micro test tubes properly would also have affected results gathered, which is most evident in the case of the barium chloride and sodium hydroxide reaction which should not have theoretically produced a precipitate. This, like mixing up the labels, would also have been a random error. Suggestions for Improvements: A further experiment can be conducted based on data gathered in this experiment. As the mass of the precipitates of the barium chloride and sodium hydroxide combinations were found, it may be interesting to compare these theoretical predictions to experimental results. Thus in this case, the precipitate of the ionic solution would be filtered with its mass then taken, subtracting the mass of the filter paper. The following improvements to the experiment conducted are displayed in the table below: Limitation identified Type of resultant error Suggested method of improvement Faulty equipment Systematic - Comparing pipette with another same size pipette. - Testing pipette works properly before using it to carry out investigation. Confusing labels of ionic solutions in test tubes Random - Using a permanent marker to make small marks on test tubes. - Using sticky tape to stick labels onto test tubes. Cross contamination Random - Having a minimum of six pipettes- one for each solution combination for part B - Carefully washing equipment before and after use. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. A comparison of various proprieary antacids

    Stir manually or use the glass rod is necessary until all the antacid had dissolved. 7. Remove the funnel from the mouth of the burette, and add 2-3 drops of Phenolphthalein indicator to the mixture in the conical flask. 8. Place a white tile under the conical flask. 9.

  2. Aim: To determine the concentration of chloride ions in sea water by titration ...

    In the presence of one, open the tap to let it run out. 11) Pipette 10cm3 of diluted sea water into a 250cm3 conical flask. Tapping the pipette lightly against the flask to ensure all of the solution has been transferred.

  1. Disappearing cross experiment

    Reaction Time (sec) 22 45 32 35 42 27 52 17 62 13 As can be seen from the table above the two reaction times for each temperature are very close, meaning that both experiments were conducted without any noticeable errors.

  2. IB chemistry revision notes

    It works within a narrow pH to allow the interaction of O2 and haemoglobin. Acid-Base Titrations 14 12 3 2 7 2 1 1. Alkali begins to neutralise ions () We're adding more so equilibrium moves to the right. 2.

  1. Experiment Plan. Chemistry IA: Electrolysis of Metal Sulphate solutions (NiSO4)

    by bending the electrodes it Adjust the current to 0.5 amps using the variable resistor Connect the electrolytes into the circuit by clipping on the wires and turn the power pack on Using the stopwatch, time for 2 minutes whilst looking at the ammeter to ensure the current remains the

  2. Electrolysis of copper sulphate

    It is important to test all measuring equipment for correct calibration in a trial run before performing the experiment and this should have been done Extension and improvement To reduce the scatter and improve accuracy of the results it would be possible to increase the number of sample electrolytic cells in each trial.

  1. Measuring the fatty acid percentage of the reused sunflower oil after numerous times of ...

    ± 0.019% g A% = (67.0 ± 0.1% x 0.0028 x 100) 5.249 ± 0.018% = 3.6% ± 0.1% ml/g oleic acid Trial 3: V = 65.5 ± 0.1 ml → Vε = 65.5 ± 0.1% ml m = 5.109 ± 0.001 g → mε = 5.109 ± 0.020% g A% = (65.5 ± 0.1 x 0.0028 x 100)

  2. To determine the standard enthalpy of formation of Magnesium Oxide using Hess Law.

    Graph 2: Highest temperature reached in Part X, Trial 2. Figure 2: Zoomed in view of the y-axis and horizontal line intersection. From the figure, the value for the maximum temperature reached can be safely estimated to be 40.8oC. Since the maximum temperature reached by the solution of 15cm3 water

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work