• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economics Article Commentary - The article deals with the raise of a tariff on Chinese solar panels and their impacts on the market, as well as general tensions between the U.S. and China.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

COMMENTARY COVERSHEET Candidate Name André Libeaux Candidate Number 001122-025 Economics Commentary Number 3 Title of Extract US commerce department brings heavy tariffs against Chinese solar panels Source of Extract Guardian Date of Extract 17/5/12 Word Count 730 Date Commentary Written 25/12/12 Sections of the Syllabus to which 3 Commentary Refers Bibliography “Economics” Blink&Dorton ________________ US commerce department brings heavy tariffs against Chinese solar panels Investigation finds China kept prices low with subsidies, but some in US warn tariff will slow adoption of solar energy The Obama administration imposed heavy tariffs on Chinese solar panels on Thursday, after finding that China is flooding the market with government subsidised products. The preliminary decision, that China had dumped solar products on the US for less than the cost of manufacture, will result in tariffs of between 31% and 250% on Chinese imports. It was seen on Thursday as a mixed blessing. US solar panel makers, who brought the original complaint, are expected to benefit. But the tariffs, by forcing up prices, are expected to slow the adoption of solar power more generally. There were also fears the move could lead to a broader US-Chinese trade war. In its decision, the US commerce department said it would impose tariffs of about 31% on about 60 Chinese solar panel exporters which participated in the investigation, including Wuxi Suntech and Trina Solar. ...read more.

Middle

The article deals with the raise of a tariff on Chinese solar panels and their impacts on the market, as well as general tensions between the U.S. and China. A trade war is implied to be on the rise. The situation is, ?that China had dumped solar products on the US for less than the cost of manufacture, will result in tariffs of between 31% and 250% on Chinese imports.?(line 5-6) . The industry in the U.S. is protected because of ?? the advantage they have had as a result of their illegal trade practices," (line 24-25) As shown in Diagram 1, price increases from P to P+t, The share of the market from domestic producers increases from Q1 to Q3, shown by revenue g to a+b+c+g+h and the imported share decreases from Q2Q3 to Q3Q4 shown by a revenue decrease from h+i+j+k to i+j. US Government revenue of this tariff is d+e and there is a dead-weight loss of welfare, as consumer surplus f is lost. World efficiency decreases by c, due to less efficient competitors producing a greater share of the Quantity supplied to the market, which is a misallocation of resources, hence undesirable. ...read more.

Conclusion

factor, both spend their resources on this trade war, which is simply inefficiency and a misallocation of resources, hence a big threat to sustainability, because this trade war could in several years not only be about solar panels but a whole range of products, which affects a great number of people, seeing that the U.S. and China are the two biggest economies. This trade war is further reinforced by China wanting ?to take America to the international trade court or WTO? (line 35). So rather than producing what both countries have comparative advantages in, the U.S. commerce department tries to save a ?sunset? industry, as the demand in Europe declines and Chinese competitors produce at prices lower than the manufacturing cost. Concluding, both governments work against with counter-veiling protectionist measures, which must be critically evaluated as they slow down the economy. Although the U.S. can save more market share for them by using the measures, a lot of efficiency is lost and the resources could be allocated into sectors with comparative advantage, hence a problem of economic structure, as inefficient producers should close down. More importantly it is a threat to environmental sustainability, as it hinders the adoption of ?green energy? with higher prices,?precisely at the moment that solar power is becoming competitive,". (line 37-38). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Economics essays

  1. Extended Essay Economics

    This means that the supplier has to wait for payment and this causes a great deal of problems for the firm. The supplier may stop supplying their goods, and, while the firm waits for the supplier to get paid, they cannot import any more goods.

  2. IB Economics IA Commentary. Title of Extract: EU imposes dumping tariffs on Chinese ...

    Facing pressure from the European Ceramic Tile Manufacturers' Federation (CET), an organization representing numerous European tile firms who suffer from cheap competition with Chinese firms, the Commission imposed these duties to drive up the

  1. US Tariff On Solar Panels

    US Firms will supply Q2 goods and overseas producers will decrease the amount they supply from Q4Q1 to Q3Q2. As a result, import expenditures will reduce from the region between Q4 and Q1 to the region between Q3 and Q2 (M), therefore correcting the country's balance of payments3.

  2. Demand-deficient Unemployment article commentary.

    Despite this, for the workers a low minimum wage which does not keep pace with inflation, decreasing the real value of money, may affect their standards of living. Also, the low minimum wage could 'affect the economy and jobs by depressing confidence and the purchasing power of the low-paid workers.'4

  1. Trade between the US and China - International IA Commentary

    has to find ways of raising funds, such as increasing interest rates and borrowing more money from other countries. While higher interest rates would attract more foreign investments, it would also most likely result in a decrease in domestic consumption levels ? borrowing money would become more expensive, and there would also be increased incentive to save.

  2. Is there possibilities of war for resources?

    China?s rapid industrialization has been accompanied by water contamination affecting 300 million people, that is nearly a third of the population. If present trends continue two out of three people on the planet will live in countries considered to be ?water stressed.? The World Bank projects that 40 percent of

  1. 15 Historical Economic Questions on Mercatilism and the Development of European Countries.

    JP Morgan moved reserve funds to banks lacking capital in the hopes to help them make a swift recovery. Following this minor glitch in economic history was the implementation of the Federal Reserve. This was to be created by the government in order to play the role of a ?bank

  2. Negative external impacts of women's oppression on the economic and environmental welfare of Pakistan

    One obvious result of widespread poverty is a drought of capital. Lack of capital was one of the most detrimental characteristics of her impoverished country. With entrepreneurial spirits, Saima needed financing if she was going to support her family. the Kashf foundation made this possible by lending Saima small amounts of money at a time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work