• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Monopolies or Perfect Competition

Extracts from this document...


What is better for the consumer: A Monopoly, or Perfect Competition? A Monopoly is a market structure in which only one firm controls the entire market without any close substitutes. In contrast, Perfect Competition is a market structure in which there are thousands of buyers and sellers where all firms are price takers and always make normal profit in the long run. In a monopoly however, because it has barriers to entry they have no competition for their product and firms tend to gain large abnormal profits in the long run which is bad for the consumer, but good for the firm. These barriers to entry are that they have very high Abnormal Profit is when any profit is gained over and above the normal profit level. ...read more.


Despite some of the disadvantages to consumers when it comes to a monopoly consumers can still profit from the market's gain. This is because consumers can invest in monopolies and when the market is doing well so are it's investors. Typically, for a consumer, a market with perfect competition would be better. This is because if one of the many firms in that market raise their prices the consumer can simply switch to another firm selling those same goods at a lower price because in Perfect Competition there is no brand loyalty. This also explains why firms in Perfect Competition have perfectly elastic demand. One more plus side to Perfect Competition for consumers is that when demand goes up supply goes up accordingly due to the fact that there are no barriers to entry so more firms simply join the market this insures that prices will remain low. ...read more.


On top of all that buyers have "perfect knowledge." Perfect Knowledge means that buyers have full knowledge about the products and prices and in monopolies they do not. Another negative to Perfect Competition is the possible negative externalities such as pollution. Also, because they only make normal profits, this is insufficient for consumers to invest. In conclusion, Perfect Competition benefits consumers more due to their low prices and the perfect knowledge that the consumers have. Also, they are economically efficient because the competition between firms ensures that firms attempt to minimize their costs and move towards productive efficiency (producing at the lowest level of cost that it can). Overall, firms in perfect competition are always responsive to the needs of consumers because they have to be. Whereas monopolies do not, and they tend to use the lack of knowledge of consumers to their advantage in order to make abnormal profits. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Economics essays

  1. Evaluate the view that governments should always prevent firms from being monopolies.

    But if there is no or just a bit competition (like in a monopoly) and the firm can decide their prices then the consumer has to pay more.

  2. Why did the UK did not join the EC until 1973

    And there is one thing you are supremely good at grasping: a hard fact. We will have to make Europe without you but then you will have to come in and join us" (G. Stuart, 2003). Monnet's prediction was very accurate since in August 1961 Britain - along with Denmark,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work