• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An unnatural alliance that was about to fall apart after the defeat of the common enemy(TM). To what extent does this explain the origin of the cold war?

Extracts from this document...


'An unnatural alliance that was about to fall apart after the defeat of the common enemy'. To what extent does this explain the origin of the cold war? As WWII had ended in 1945, many experts believed that peace would finally come towards them and expected to see no war for a while. However the conflict began again, this time between the two superpowers (USA, Soviet Union). Unlike WWII, the conflict between the two super powers was more like a relation problem rather than actual war conflict over territories. Ironically the two nations met alliance during the battle against Germany and Japan, but as soon as the war had ended, the positive relation got separated. Through the 'Cold War' serious conflicts began between the two nations. As soon as Adolf Hitler declared war on USA in December 11th 1941, this decision automatically made the US army join WWII, making alliances with several European nations. By the time the US had arrived in Europe, pressure was increasing to the German army and slowly they began to lose their territories. USA, Soviets and allies had worked quite well to push the Germans back and in 1944 they were able to invade Normandy (Mostly the victory was deserved to the US). ...read more.


As the Soviets marched to the Far East, the US thought that they wouldn't need any Soviet help and they were also desperate to end the war against Japan so on August 6th they dropped the atomic bomb in Hiroshima killing over 700,000 people. By the time the atomic bomb was dropped the Soviets were in Manchuria (they declared war on Japan on the 8th.). In August 9th, the US dropped their second atomic bomb in Nagasaki which also killed a lot of people. The bomb dropped in Nagasaki was one of the mysteries which historians couldn't find the actual purpose. Some believe that the second bomb was dropped because the Japanese didn't surrender after the first bomb was dropped in Hiroshima; also some argue that the second bomb was used to intimidate Stalin. Other Historians say that the weapon was used to stop the Soviet forces in Manchuria heading south towards the Korean Peninsula. Truman's successor Eisenhower said 'It wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing'. He believed that Truman's intention of using the second bomb was to frighten the Soviets. On September 2nd the Japanese surrender was officially signed on board the US battleship Missouri in Tokyo Bay. After WWII the relation between the US and Soviets were like cats and dogs; many people believed that there could be another war, this time between the two superpowers and USA wanted to avoid another war. ...read more.


The cause of the 'Cold War' was mainly by the two super powers, and basically it was more like a power competition between the two nations. WWII can be seen as a major reason for the two nations to fight each other. As the Germans surrendered in 1945, USA and Russia were all hungry for territories, which soon caused a diplomatic problem. Some Historians revealed that the blame for the Cold War was on the Americans. Gar Alperovitz for example blamed Truman for using the atomic weapon, which changed the relation worse with the Soviets. 'Truman decided to drop the bomb as a means to intimidate the Soviet Union'. If the Soviets and the US prevented greediness than probably their relation would remain as it was during WWII. President Roosevelt's death can be seen as another problem that caused the cold war. While he was alive he made a lot of agreements with Stalin but after his death, the relation between the two countries got shaken and some of the agreements were not met, causing conflicts. Also if President Truman would not have used the atomic bomb than the Cold War might not have existed and the relations with the super powers would have been better. ?? ?? ?? ?? 8/3/08 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    This set a familiar pattern b) Hungary. Again, the Communists became the largest party in the 1947 elections. They imprisoned opposition politicians and attacked Church leaders c) Romania. Romania had communist prime minister and a left wing coalition. In 1947 the communists abolished of the monarchy d)

  2. The Role Played by the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences in the Origin of the ...

    the cold war; the different ideologies and mutual distrust and suspicion also played a great role.

  1. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    The West had attempted to ease the tensions by maintaining good relations with its eastern, counterpart, however, it was forced to reduce the intensity and pace at which this process was supposed to happen due to the sensitivity of the situation at hand.

  2. "To what extent can it be said that the First World War was caused ...

    The Franco-Russian alliance was officially formed in 1894 and in 1907; a similar agreement was signed between Britain and Russia, creating the Triple Entente. Each alliance that was created added to the tension between countries, which forced them further apart.

  1. Causes of WWII

    A Nine Power Treaty allowed them to trade with China on an equal basis. * London Naval Conference. The ratio for naval tonnage was changed for Britian, USA and Japan. Italy and France refused to take part. * The London Naval Treaty 1936.

  2. Why was the USA unable to defeat communism in south East Asia in the ...

    Although the Vietcong were not as technologically advanced as the US, they had tactical advantage. The Vietcong were the military branch of the national liberation front. For arms, ammunition and special equipment, the Vietcong depended on the Ho Chi Minh trail.

  1. American Response to the Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    bombs be made; but there was some justification - the danger that the Germans would make them" (Long)

  2. Compare and contrast the policies of the USA and USSR towards Korea between 1945 ...

    This war had created a fear in the United States of the domino effects of communism. ? As to the military conduct of the war in Vietnam, a senior American veteran of both Korea and Vietnam remarked, "We went into Korea with a very poor army, and came out with a pretty good one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work