• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by Alexander II. To what extent do you agree with this assertion? The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by Alexand

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by Alexander II." To what extent do you agree with this assertion? Russia through the first half of 19th century was very backward country, especially comparing with main European powers of that time. While the liberalism and industrialization were spreading on the West, Russia was following feudal system. The turning-point- idea of great reforms, was made by Alexander II after Russian failure in Crimean war. He wanted to introduce profound changes, for which the army reforms were kind of base. Thus, later on he undertook education, law, press and agriculture reforms. As far as there were many steps made by the Tsar to enhance Russia's condition, I would stated that not only "the emancipation of the serfs in Russia was genuine reform introduced by Alexander II". Moreover, standing by the idea of Russian liberal, Zaionchkovsky who said: "The peasant reform safeguarded many traces of feudalism. There can be no doubt that the reform defrauded the peasants. ...read more.

Middle

However, the rest of the aims, which were about to ensure better life to the most numerous social group in backward Russia, eventually weren't satisfying. Army reforms, the first that initiated other changes in Russia, were eventually more successful than emancipation of serfs. Even though all the reforms were subjected into army reforms, actually the changes in Russian army were dependent on the other aspects. Thus, followed by Alexander II's assumptions, the number of soldiers was increased- by replacing recruitment with conscription (many soldiers were peasants), more efficient equipment and methods of trainings were introduced, people in army were more educated. The Russian army rapidly became more professional, taking benefits also from the industrial and economic development of the country (railways built). Also, the changes in army included shortening time of service for conscripts, followed by service in reserve- this enabled males to lead normal life in non-war period, increasing the satisfaction of military active group of people. All the changes focused on army succeeded and they significantly fulfilled their aim- improving Russian army. ...read more.

Conclusion

Moreover, he maintained his full control over police. In courts, the new, objective way of judging encouraged bribes; political issues were judged the same way as before reforms. In case of legal and governmental reforms, some introduced changes were visible but still the influence of the Tsar, coming out from his will to maintain autocratic rule, was the most determining for the policies. Reforms initiated by Alexander II- to improve Russia's condition and to overtake developed West, were definitely the most far-reaching than any others of previous tsars. Son of Nicholas I, aware of the backwardness of his country decided to introduce changes which were supposed to increase status and welfare of Russia , keeping his autocratic power at the same time. Each of his reforms had its successes and failures. However, claiming that "the emancipation of serfs was the only genuine reform" made by Alexander II is, at least in my opinion, a misunderstanding. Taking into account, to what extend the aims of singular reforms were achieved, abolishing serfdom for a long time actually didn't bring any changes, whereas the effects of other reforms were visible among society in a short period of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    Thus, in another move to restore the highest level of autocracy in Russia, Alexander III applied this repressive policy of education while Alexander II strived for modernization of Russia and its assets as he promoted a policy of universal education.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions?

    There were also various groups that expressed concern about the welfare of the peasants under serfdom as they were treated more like possessions than human beings. Economically serfdom was inefficient and was keeping Russia from social and economic progress. Lastly peasant disturbances were increasing and by 1859 Russia was faced by the prospect of a peasant war.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    For these reasons, it was better to have serfdom dismantled. In 1857, believing that ?it is better to abolish serfdom from above, than to wait for it to abolish itself from below?, Alexander set up a secret committee to abolish serfdom under the chairmanship of Prince Alexei Orlov.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Took longer to defeat a declining Turkey in 1877 than it should have and Russia suffered defeats in the Russo-Japanese 1905-1904 and World War One. 2. People could still be substituted and officers remained highly aristocratic. 3. Still based on peasant conscription, illiteracy reduced the effectiveness of training.

  1. US History. To what extent were the aims of Reconstruction achieved by 1877?

    Another success of Reconstruction was a result of a vigorous political education program undertaken for the Afro-Americans, they main objective of this program was to teach the ex-slaves how to vote, ?especially, how to vote Republican?. The freedman did everything to support the new regimes, this helped Reconstruction successful as

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Since they had no savings they were offered 100 per cent mortgages, 80 per cent offered by the state bank and 20 per cent by the landlord himself. The peasant now had redemption payments that became a lifelong burden that then had to be handed down on to their children.

  1. Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III. ...

    Texts were also published rather than censored first now which meant These policies appear even more radical when compared with the counter-reforms put in place by Alexander III to counteract his father?s highly relaxed censorship rules, issuing ?The Temporary Rules for the Press? which tightened all press and publications so

  2. Why did Alexander II introduce a program of reforms at the beginning of the ...

    As for the judicial reform, in 1864, it brought equality to all before the law and also a jury was pronounced to judge accused citizens in court as an equal trial for all. Regarding the local government, the Tsar noticed that immense numbers of citizens were now populating the countryside

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work