• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by Alexander II. To what extent do you agree with this assertion? The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by Alexand

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by Alexander II." To what extent do you agree with this assertion? Russia through the first half of 19th century was very backward country, especially comparing with main European powers of that time. While the liberalism and industrialization were spreading on the West, Russia was following feudal system. The turning-point- idea of great reforms, was made by Alexander II after Russian failure in Crimean war. He wanted to introduce profound changes, for which the army reforms were kind of base. Thus, later on he undertook education, law, press and agriculture reforms. As far as there were many steps made by the Tsar to enhance Russia's condition, I would stated that not only "the emancipation of the serfs in Russia was genuine reform introduced by Alexander II". Moreover, standing by the idea of Russian liberal, Zaionchkovsky who said: "The peasant reform safeguarded many traces of feudalism. There can be no doubt that the reform defrauded the peasants. ...read more.

Middle

However, the rest of the aims, which were about to ensure better life to the most numerous social group in backward Russia, eventually weren't satisfying. Army reforms, the first that initiated other changes in Russia, were eventually more successful than emancipation of serfs. Even though all the reforms were subjected into army reforms, actually the changes in Russian army were dependent on the other aspects. Thus, followed by Alexander II's assumptions, the number of soldiers was increased- by replacing recruitment with conscription (many soldiers were peasants), more efficient equipment and methods of trainings were introduced, people in army were more educated. The Russian army rapidly became more professional, taking benefits also from the industrial and economic development of the country (railways built). Also, the changes in army included shortening time of service for conscripts, followed by service in reserve- this enabled males to lead normal life in non-war period, increasing the satisfaction of military active group of people. All the changes focused on army succeeded and they significantly fulfilled their aim- improving Russian army. ...read more.

Conclusion

Moreover, he maintained his full control over police. In courts, the new, objective way of judging encouraged bribes; political issues were judged the same way as before reforms. In case of legal and governmental reforms, some introduced changes were visible but still the influence of the Tsar, coming out from his will to maintain autocratic rule, was the most determining for the policies. Reforms initiated by Alexander II- to improve Russia's condition and to overtake developed West, were definitely the most far-reaching than any others of previous tsars. Son of Nicholas I, aware of the backwardness of his country decided to introduce changes which were supposed to increase status and welfare of Russia , keeping his autocratic power at the same time. Each of his reforms had its successes and failures. However, claiming that "the emancipation of serfs was the only genuine reform" made by Alexander II is, at least in my opinion, a misunderstanding. Taking into account, to what extend the aims of singular reforms were achieved, abolishing serfdom for a long time actually didn't bring any changes, whereas the effects of other reforms were visible among society in a short period of time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    Even though both Tsars had different perspectives about Education, Judicial and Foreign Policy, they shared their ideology of the supremacy of Russian ethnicity. Under Tsar Alexander II, The Ems Ukaz was applied in 1876 which banned the use of Ukrainian, Polish and Belarusian Language in print and in public places.

  2. Assess the successes and failures of Nicholas II between 1849 and 1917:

    Along with other points, his reforms were able to satisfy the needs of the country, making it less dependent on agriculture and modernizing it through industrialization.

  1. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    A History of the World in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000. * During 1929-32, Stalin's system of Collectivization had weakened Stalin's authority, and to retain power he initiated the use of Terror or the Great Purge. * Throughout the Great Purge, Stalin had the NKVD (Cheka)

  2. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    She also appointed corrupt ministers that along with Rasputin's personal behaviour that included alcohol made the prestige and reputation of the regime decline even further. Moreover, the Tsar ignored the chaotic events that took place just before his downfall

  1. To what extent did Alexander II's reforms cause more problems than they solved?

    Moreover the Tsar was now able to reform other critical parts of the system, such as the army, finance and education, which without the emancipation of the serfs couldn't have been possible. In other words, it opened the door to the modernisation of the country.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Reducing offences carrying capital punishment and abolishing flogging. Successes 1. Produced large savings in state expenditure (1846 budget was 45% military). Milyutin had restored Russia?s international reputation. 2. Developed a trained reserve which could be mobilized when needed and it helped the spread of literacy as 2-3m were educated 1870-1890 Failures 1.

  1. US History. To what extent were the aims of Reconstruction achieved by 1877?

    Another success of Reconstruction was a result of a vigorous political education program undertaken for the Afro-Americans, they main objective of this program was to teach the ex-slaves how to vote, ?especially, how to vote Republican?. The freedman did everything to support the new regimes, this helped Reconstruction successful as

  2. Despite his apparently liberal policies, Alexander II was just as conservative as Alexander III. ...

    Alexander II also massively reformed the judiciary system when he came into power, making trials fairer for most people put on the stand. The new policies were hugely liberal and starkly contrasted the repressive judiciary policies put in place by his son.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work