• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the people or the political ideas of radical groups becoming more appealing to the people?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsar's inadequacy as a ruler of the people or the political ideas of radical groups becoming more appealing to the people?" Thu Nhi Le Klein Oak High School Candidate Number: Word Count: 1915 Table of Contents A. Plan of Investigation.............................................Page 3 B. Summary of Evidence............................................Page 3 C. Evaluation of sources.............................................Page 5 D. Analysis............................................................Page 6 E. Conclusion..........................................................Page 6 F. List of Sources..................................................... Page 7 "Was the Russian Revolution due more to the tsar's inadequacy as a ruler of the people or the political ideas of radical groups becoming more appealing to the people?" A. Plan of Investigation Russia was in turmoil by the early 20th century from World War I, inflation, and shortages of food. A revolution ensued due to these issues. Many people attributed much of the blame to Nicholas II, the czar of Russia of that time period. At the same time, radical groups such as the Social Democrats and Social Revolutionaries attracted popular support of the people that added fuel to the fire of starting a revolution. The aim of this investigation is to find if Nicholas's inadequacy of ruling was the main cause of the Russian Revolution and the factors that support this statement; or if the growing political ideas of radical factions influenced citizens' beliefs. The investigation will cover the different causes of the revolution and what aspects influenced the start of the revolution more. ...read more.

Middle

He also served as President Reagan's National Security Council adviser on Soviet and East European affairs in 1981-82, and he has twice received a Guggenheim fellowship.15 This shows that he is very knowledgeable about topics on Russia. A limitation would be that he is biased because Pipes had consistently labeled the Soviets an aggressive imperialistic power bent on world domination. The New York Times states that the book is "A deep and eloquent condemnation of the revolution and its aftermath." This proves that the author does indeed have a bias with his diction. The book, A History of Russia, by Nicholas V. Riasanovsky, was published in 1984. The purpose of the book is to provide information on the five periods of Russia: Kievan, Appanage, Muscovite, Imperial, and Soviet Russia. The value of the book is that the author is a Professor of European History at the University of California- Berkley since 1957. This shows that he is well educated in Russian History. He has also worked in several West European and Soviet centers of Slavic studies, including the Russian cities of Moscow and Leningrad. This shows that he not only has an American view of issues, but also a Russian one, which could help him be less biased in his book. Another value would be that although he states his own position on points of contention, he also presents the information in contrasting viewpoints which enables the readers to form their own judgment. ...read more.

Conclusion

Print. 1 Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia Fourth Edition, (New York: Oxford Press, 1984), 402. 2 Chung, < http://www.thecorner.org/hist/russia/revo1905.htm> 3 Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia Fourth Edition, (New York: Oxford Press, 1984), 421. 4 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), 68-69. 5 Rosenberg, < http://history1900s.about.com/od/famouscrimesscandals/a/rasputin.htm> 6 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), 73. 7 Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia Fourth Edition, (New York: Oxford Press, 1984), 430. 8 Michael Gibson, The Communist Bloc, (England: Wayland, 1979), 12. 9 Stewart Ross, The Russian Revolution, (New York: The Bookwright Press, 1989), 32. 10 John Reed, Ten Days that Shook the World, (New York: Lawrence Wishard, 1934) 11 Chung, < http://www.thecorner.org/hist/russia/revo1905.htm> 12 Woodford McClellan, Russia A History of the Soviet Period Second Edition, (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1990), 8. 13 Woodford McClellan, Russia A History of the Soviet Period Second Edition, (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1990), 8. 14 Woodford McClellan, Russia A History of the Soviet Period Second Edition, (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1990), 9. 15 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), title. 16 Rex Wade, The Bolshevik Revolution and Russian Civil War, (Wesport: Greenword Press, 2001), 129. 17 Rex Wade, The Bolshevik Revolution and Russian Civil War, (Wesport: Greenword Press, 2001), 130. 18 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), 77. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Comparing the Causes of the French and Russian Revolutions

    The king of France, Louis XVI also made crucial mistakes. When France was in a state of bankruptcy, Louis XVI did absolutely nothing and just let matters drift (Beck 219). He had a financial advisor who attempted to deal with the bankruptcy by instituting reforms such as taxing landowners, easing

  2. Revision notes - Causes of the French Revolution and the Development of the Revolution ...

    This marked the beginning of the French Revolution. The representatives of the Third Estate viewed themselves as the spokesmen for the whole French nation. (Not the subject of a monarch any more). They declared themselves as National Assembly and swore not to disperse till they had drafted a constitution for the French that would limit the power of the monarch.

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    By July 1790-> 1200 members of the club. The club also acquired affiliates throughout the France. July 1791 -> Jacobin Club split over a petition calling for the removal of Louis XVI (after his unsuccessful attempt to flee the France).

  2. The Glorious Revolution

    Also, Parliament passed the Triennial Act, which made it mandatory for Parliament to meet annually. By the end of 1641, the Parliament split into a moderate group, which desired no further change, and a radical group, which wanted to make more change such as abolishing bishops in the Anglican Church.

  1. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    Three years of total war damaged the Russian economy greatly bringing a contraction in the economy, inflation and a decline in the living conditions of Russians. Russia's blocked trade routes only aggravated the situation as Russia could not export her grain.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Milyutin warned that military reform was impossible while serfdom survived. 5. Kochan/Abrahams ?Serfdom does not permit us to shorten the term of service not to increase the number of those on indefinite leave so as to reduce the number of troops on hand? 6. Revealed inadequacy in Russia?s communications.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    What do you think? Israel created and Palestine ceased to exist: - Israeli casualties were very high but the Israeli that now existed was far larger than that proposed in the UN Partition Plan (from 55% of Palestine to 79%) - The UN secured a truce in January 1949, and by July, Israel and the neighbouring Arab states had signed separate armistices agreements.

  2. The History and Development of the American Dream

    legal advertisements, Americans are told again and again that the road to the financial success of the American Dream is more a matter of luck than hard work. Criticism of the American Dream The main point many critics pick up is the fact that it is impossible for everyone to become wealthy and successful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work