• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the people or the political ideas of radical groups becoming more appealing to the people?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsar's inadequacy as a ruler of the people or the political ideas of radical groups becoming more appealing to the people?" Thu Nhi Le Klein Oak High School Candidate Number: Word Count: 1915 Table of Contents A. Plan of Investigation.............................................Page 3 B. Summary of Evidence............................................Page 3 C. Evaluation of sources.............................................Page 5 D. Analysis............................................................Page 6 E. Conclusion..........................................................Page 6 F. List of Sources..................................................... Page 7 "Was the Russian Revolution due more to the tsar's inadequacy as a ruler of the people or the political ideas of radical groups becoming more appealing to the people?" A. Plan of Investigation Russia was in turmoil by the early 20th century from World War I, inflation, and shortages of food. A revolution ensued due to these issues. Many people attributed much of the blame to Nicholas II, the czar of Russia of that time period. At the same time, radical groups such as the Social Democrats and Social Revolutionaries attracted popular support of the people that added fuel to the fire of starting a revolution. The aim of this investigation is to find if Nicholas's inadequacy of ruling was the main cause of the Russian Revolution and the factors that support this statement; or if the growing political ideas of radical factions influenced citizens' beliefs. The investigation will cover the different causes of the revolution and what aspects influenced the start of the revolution more. ...read more.

Middle

He also served as President Reagan's National Security Council adviser on Soviet and East European affairs in 1981-82, and he has twice received a Guggenheim fellowship.15 This shows that he is very knowledgeable about topics on Russia. A limitation would be that he is biased because Pipes had consistently labeled the Soviets an aggressive imperialistic power bent on world domination. The New York Times states that the book is "A deep and eloquent condemnation of the revolution and its aftermath." This proves that the author does indeed have a bias with his diction. The book, A History of Russia, by Nicholas V. Riasanovsky, was published in 1984. The purpose of the book is to provide information on the five periods of Russia: Kievan, Appanage, Muscovite, Imperial, and Soviet Russia. The value of the book is that the author is a Professor of European History at the University of California- Berkley since 1957. This shows that he is well educated in Russian History. He has also worked in several West European and Soviet centers of Slavic studies, including the Russian cities of Moscow and Leningrad. This shows that he not only has an American view of issues, but also a Russian one, which could help him be less biased in his book. Another value would be that although he states his own position on points of contention, he also presents the information in contrasting viewpoints which enables the readers to form their own judgment. ...read more.

Conclusion

Print. 1 Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia Fourth Edition, (New York: Oxford Press, 1984), 402. 2 Chung, < http://www.thecorner.org/hist/russia/revo1905.htm> 3 Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia Fourth Edition, (New York: Oxford Press, 1984), 421. 4 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), 68-69. 5 Rosenberg, < http://history1900s.about.com/od/famouscrimesscandals/a/rasputin.htm> 6 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), 73. 7 Nicholas Riasanovsky, A History of Russia Fourth Edition, (New York: Oxford Press, 1984), 430. 8 Michael Gibson, The Communist Bloc, (England: Wayland, 1979), 12. 9 Stewart Ross, The Russian Revolution, (New York: The Bookwright Press, 1989), 32. 10 John Reed, Ten Days that Shook the World, (New York: Lawrence Wishard, 1934) 11 Chung, < http://www.thecorner.org/hist/russia/revo1905.htm> 12 Woodford McClellan, Russia A History of the Soviet Period Second Edition, (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1990), 8. 13 Woodford McClellan, Russia A History of the Soviet Period Second Edition, (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1990), 8. 14 Woodford McClellan, Russia A History of the Soviet Period Second Edition, (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, 1990), 9. 15 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), title. 16 Rex Wade, The Bolshevik Revolution and Russian Civil War, (Wesport: Greenword Press, 2001), 129. 17 Rex Wade, The Bolshevik Revolution and Russian Civil War, (Wesport: Greenword Press, 2001), 130. 18 Richard Pipes, A Concise History of the Russian Revolution, (New York: Knopf, 1995), 77. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    A leading role in Legislative Assembly played the Girondins. Girondins -> revolutionaries, loose grouping of republican politicians. Many of the came from the department of Gironde. They were lawyers, intellectuals and journalists, originally they were members of the Jacobin Club, but they left it in August 1792 (because The Jacobins became too radical for them)

  2. Revision notes - Causes of the French Revolution and the Development of the Revolution ...

    of the Third Estate as it did not want to see the control passing from the Second Estate to the bourgeois leaders of the Third Estate. Parlement essentially represented upper class and was very wary of the power of the Third Estate.

  1. Analyse the short and long term causes of the 1917 Feb/March Russian Revolution

    have had to work and live under dreadful conditions while having no freedom. This was clear evidence that the working class had been unhappy and angered with their treatment for a long time. This irritation was exacerbated, when the impact of the war had hit the home front hard.

  2. Comparing the Causes of the French and Russian Revolutions

    Leaving Alexandra in charge was a horrible mistake as she was greatly influenced by Gregorii Rasputin who was a corrupt individual. When Alexandra gave Rasputin more power he abused his power such as giving his friends high positions in the government (Oxley 81, 82).

  1. Napoleon: Son or Enemy of the Revolution

    Napoleon reused the principles of the Revolution, and simply emphasized on ideas that have previously been adopted. "The belief that all French people must unite in embarking on a revolution which would bring a better and more just future for all citizens."

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Milyutin warned that military reform was impossible while serfdom survived. 5. Kochan/Abrahams ?Serfdom does not permit us to shorten the term of service not to increase the number of those on indefinite leave so as to reduce the number of troops on hand? 6. Revealed inadequacy in Russia?s communications.

  1. Compare and contrast the causes and nature of the February and October revolutions in ...

    the people avoided blocked bridges in the city by crossing the frozen Neva River in big numbers. Another point of contrast is that the October Revolution was not as violent, the February one had only five soldiers, one sailor and no defenders killed.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    the Soviet historians Dawisha and Dawisha state, the primary goal was to secure the USSR's southern borders and act in the national interest before aiding 'national liberation movements'. Economic - Oil has always been a significant reason for the continued interest of international powers in the region, and after the policy of d�tente, this became primary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work