• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The political and economical impact of the First World War on Canada was more positive than negative. How far would you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


When one thinks of war, one automatically thinks of blood, death and despair. War is never a positive thing, but in some cases it can have a positive impact. Is this the case with Canada in World War I ? Were the political and economical impacts more positive than negative? To decide this, first you must decide if the ends justified the means. Does a new and stronger sense of Canadian identify, along with years of freedom and peace justify the loss of 60,00 lives and even more wounded Canadians? Let's look at this politically . The biggest political change was that Canada entered the war as a British colony and left as a nation. An independent nation that was confident in it's ability to manage it's own affairs The war marked the transition of Canada's armed forces from militia of questionable value to what was probably the most powerful army corps on either side of the conflict. A force capable of planning and executing independent operations, beginning with it's victory in Vimy Ridge. ...read more.


The Liberals won out in Quebec, but only won 20 seats in the rest of the country. This election deeply divided Canada. The war greatly advanced the cause of social reform. English-Canadian reformers argued that just as troops fought for a noble cause on the battlefield, so should those at home campaign for noble causes at the home front; against materialism, alcoholism and corruption. Women also obtained many more rights during the war. They were allowed to take over jobs, previously open to only men. They also gained support for women's suffrage and prohibition. Women reformers argued that humanity's aggressive nature had caused the worldwide cataclysm. They believed that women deserved the right to vote. If women had the opportunity to rule, wars would cease to exist. Women have a gentler nature and do not usually resort to physical violence. They pointed out the inconsistency of fighting democracy abroad when more than half of Canadians were denied the democratic right to vote at home. They reminded society of their scarifies for the cause; in their minds they had earned the right to participate in Canada's political life. ...read more.


The government also introduced direct taxation. First it imposed a business-profits tax, then in 1917, it imposed its first federal income tax; 3% for a family earning more than $3000 or an individual earning more than $1500. The increased cost of living hurt people on fixed income and cancelled the benefits workers received from increased wages. None of these may be overly positive things, but it did set up a foundation for modern economics. In conclusion, I agree to an extent that the political and economic impact of the First World War was more positive than negative. Politically speaking this is definitely true, not so much for economic but, all in all the war may have been a terrible event, and many lives may have been lost, but it had good results. Here we are today, still a well-known, independent nation, known for our freedom and peace. This is all thanks to the impacts of the First World War. How can that be a negative thing? " The political and economical impact of the First World War on Canada was more positive than negative." How far would you agree with this statement? Chantelle McMullin History 12 IB Word count: 914 Sept. 26th/08 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    The main contention of the theory suggested that the partition of Africa amongst European powers developed following the Suez Crisis of 1882, when Britain found it necessary to invade Egypt, put down the uprising of Arabi, and established a formal colonization in order to preserve British access to the Suez Canal.

  2. Why did Canada send troops to Afghanistan

    Chr�tien's government predicted that the military eviction of the Taliban was likely to be as successful as the 1980s eviction of the Soviet Union from Afghanistan.20 To reinforce his decision, Prime Minister Jean Chr�tien mirrored Bush's objectives by explaining that "some

  1. Wars frequently begin ten years before the first shot is fired. To what extent ...

    This marked the start of the existence of international tension caused by suspicion amongst the Great powers in Europe. In 1882, Germany exploited the Franco-Italian problems to extend the Dual alliance into a Triple Alliance. Thus this led to the formation of the Triple Alliance in Europe, denoting the start of escalation in international tensions.

  2. "Wars frequently begin ten years before the first shot is fired." To ...

    Germany also set up a Dual Alliance with Austria-Hungary in 1879 and a Triple Alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy in 1892 and now it seemed that if war would happen, it would be

  1. The Effects of the Great Depression on Canada.

    Economy: The cause of the drought caused an aftermath, which created a burden affecting provinces. It was estimated that 33% of Canada?s Gross National Income came from exporting wheat, showing the impact on the world.

  2. The costs of the Mexican War outweigh the benefits. How true is this statement?

    For the United States, the some 13,000 troops and $15 million they lost in the war was a small price to pay for this vast expanse of land, especially when considering California, who?s addition meant that the United States now stretched from sea to sea.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    stated that any Jew, anywhere in the world, had the right to full Israeli citizenship * In August 1952, the Law of Nationality affirmed the Law of Return and also stated that non-Jews could only be citizens by being naturalised or proving by residence that they were Palestinian.

  2. Why did Tsarism fail to survive the first world war

    The peasants wanted to have their own land. Later, in 1904, 400,000 workers went on strike in St. Petersburg1, the capital. The Tsar, wanting to prevent further revolts made public meeting illegal which only made matters worse. Rural social unrest had become the main issue of the Tsar and the people wanted a liberal government, they were yearning to have their own land.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work