• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Second World War was brought about by the foreign policy of Hitler and Nazi Germany. Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


"The Second World War was brought about by the foreign policy of Hitler and Nazi Germany." Do you agree with this statement? Many key issues, several occurring simultaneously during the 1930s, caused the Second World War. Many changes occurred in countries over the world, from the end of the First World War in 1918 and onwards the rise of Hitler with the new regime of Nazi in Germany, during economic crisis in 1928. The period of warlike tensions existed between 1929 until 1939 when Second World War finally broke out, when Britain and France declared a World War against Germany after Germany's invasion of Poland occurred on the 1st of September 1939. It is mostly argued that the Second World War broke out as a result of Hitler's aggressive foreign policy however others argue that this was also resulted by Western forces' policy of Appeasement at the same time. Furthermore, the Second World War was produced by combinations of others as well; Italy's Mussolini and USSR's Stalin had also helped to afflict the warlike tension in Europe; the failure of Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations had failed to maintain peace and to avoid a war at the first time. ...read more.


New regimes of dictatorship emerged in some nations as the new leaders promised a better world for them. Weaknesses of economy in some particular nations were directly led to increased aggression and invasions to other countries, to distract the sense of weaknesses in the inside. This tension of international relationships and the disastrous impact resulted from the Economic depression later rose to alternative policies, such as to the policy of appeasement. Another key factor was the policy of Appeasement during 1936-1938. Britain and France went through the political and economical turmoil after the WW1 and later by the economic depression in 1929, therefore was more concerned about their own affairs than what was going on in the rest of Europe. Britain and France were reluctant to take a firm line against aggressive Germany. As a result, the new regimes of Hitler accelerated rapidly, with Britain and France fulfilling its momentum to expand its endless requisitions. By this Hitler was able to gain what he wanted to get; the first was the remilitarisation of Rhineland in 1936 when the rest of the world was focusing on the Abyssinian crisis in Africa. Having accomplished his first objectives in 'Rearmament', he then challenged to his territorial promises and focused on the eastern territories - Austria, Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia. ...read more.


Chamberlain from Britain now lost faith in Appeasement: as Hitler promised that 'Sudetenland is the last problem... territorial claim which I (Hitler) have to make in Europe' was betrayed, now were followed to keep the guarantee to defend Poland if attacked. As a result of a devastate world after the First World War and later the Economic depression, nationalism of rearmament and aggression threatened a war to happen and, at last, was ironically declared by Britain and France. In my opinion, Hitler's aggressive foreign policy had most contributed to start the Second World War although other factors was linked to each other for the outbreak. It was Britain and France who first declared a war; however it was inevitable because Hitler's foreign policy of aggression had already provided enough reason for a war in Europe. His unlimited ambition and requisitions had betrayed Britain's faith on the Appeasement and had gone too far. He also attempted too much on the annexation of Eastern European countries, too convinced with confidence that war would not happen. Moreover, his diplomatic alliances with the communist USSR seemed nonsense, to France and Britain's surprise, it was hypocrisy because he was an absolute anti-communist. He did not sense the scrutiny of the Europe and at last, the Second World War had begun. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    --> Berlin stands for freedom and I stand for freedom * Conclusions; a. Berlin in the middle of Eastern Germany had been put under four power occupation in 1945 b. In 1948 -9 the Berlin Blockade crisis concerned not only Berlin but the whole future of Germany and was followed

  2. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    o The reaction of the French government is severe. They will send the French army to the Ruhr and begin to seize anything of value. Workers will be deported to France and held to force labour. o Germany can't go to war, they urge upon the people not to cooperate with the French.

  1. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    Hobson provides Lenin with the framework for analyzing imperialism; but whereas Hobson a mature capitalist country can and should avoid imperialism, Lenin insists that it is the inevitable product of capitalism. In addition to their dissimilarities in one common idea, there were numerous incidents and facts that contradict with the

  2. The League of Nations was a failure. How far do you agree with this ...

    However, the trade of oil and coal was not banned; this is because the League feared the Americans would not support sanctions and it would mean 30,000 British coal miners would lose their job. The decision on opening the Suez canal was not from the League - the British and

  1. Nazi Germany

    Der F�hrer (Supreme leader) - president Hindenburg died and Hitler immediately took over Germany - on 3 August 1934 the army swore their loyalty to Hitler as the F�hrer of Germany (in return Hitler made a rearmament and conscription) Nazi control of Germany 1933-1945 - the aim of Nazis was

  2. Compare and contrast the economic and political developments in the USSR and Germany 1918-1924

    From 1918, the government tried to solve the crisis by keeping the money with the people, as to give them spending power and increase demand for goods and thereby create more working places so that eventually taxes could be claimed.

  1. Historical Investigation - League of Nations - Abyssinian crisis

    popularity for the election.21 Mussolini still wanted to compromise because he thought Hoare only made his statement to talk tough to satisfy the public.22 C. Evaluation of Sources Haile Selassie, "Appeal to the League of Nations," June 1936. This speech "Appeal to the League of Nations," obtained from the reliable

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    All these events presented U Thant?s unyielding efforts in bringing peace to the conflict. However, the Soviets, including the Soviet Union Ambassador Valery Zorin, had argued that they had their rights to bring shipments to Cuba as they were travelling on an international route, and claimed that the United States

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work