• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Second World War was brought about by the foreign policy of Hitler and Nazi Germany. Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Second World War was brought about by the foreign policy of Hitler and Nazi Germany." Do you agree with this statement? Many key issues, several occurring simultaneously during the 1930s, caused the Second World War. Many changes occurred in countries over the world, from the end of the First World War in 1918 and onwards the rise of Hitler with the new regime of Nazi in Germany, during economic crisis in 1928. The period of warlike tensions existed between 1929 until 1939 when Second World War finally broke out, when Britain and France declared a World War against Germany after Germany's invasion of Poland occurred on the 1st of September 1939. It is mostly argued that the Second World War broke out as a result of Hitler's aggressive foreign policy however others argue that this was also resulted by Western forces' policy of Appeasement at the same time. Furthermore, the Second World War was produced by combinations of others as well; Italy's Mussolini and USSR's Stalin had also helped to afflict the warlike tension in Europe; the failure of Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations had failed to maintain peace and to avoid a war at the first time. ...read more.

Middle

New regimes of dictatorship emerged in some nations as the new leaders promised a better world for them. Weaknesses of economy in some particular nations were directly led to increased aggression and invasions to other countries, to distract the sense of weaknesses in the inside. This tension of international relationships and the disastrous impact resulted from the Economic depression later rose to alternative policies, such as to the policy of appeasement. Another key factor was the policy of Appeasement during 1936-1938. Britain and France went through the political and economical turmoil after the WW1 and later by the economic depression in 1929, therefore was more concerned about their own affairs than what was going on in the rest of Europe. Britain and France were reluctant to take a firm line against aggressive Germany. As a result, the new regimes of Hitler accelerated rapidly, with Britain and France fulfilling its momentum to expand its endless requisitions. By this Hitler was able to gain what he wanted to get; the first was the remilitarisation of Rhineland in 1936 when the rest of the world was focusing on the Abyssinian crisis in Africa. Having accomplished his first objectives in 'Rearmament', he then challenged to his territorial promises and focused on the eastern territories - Austria, Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Chamberlain from Britain now lost faith in Appeasement: as Hitler promised that 'Sudetenland is the last problem... territorial claim which I (Hitler) have to make in Europe' was betrayed, now were followed to keep the guarantee to defend Poland if attacked. As a result of a devastate world after the First World War and later the Economic depression, nationalism of rearmament and aggression threatened a war to happen and, at last, was ironically declared by Britain and France. In my opinion, Hitler's aggressive foreign policy had most contributed to start the Second World War although other factors was linked to each other for the outbreak. It was Britain and France who first declared a war; however it was inevitable because Hitler's foreign policy of aggression had already provided enough reason for a war in Europe. His unlimited ambition and requisitions had betrayed Britain's faith on the Appeasement and had gone too far. He also attempted too much on the annexation of Eastern European countries, too convinced with confidence that war would not happen. Moreover, his diplomatic alliances with the communist USSR seemed nonsense, to France and Britain's surprise, it was hypocrisy because he was an absolute anti-communist. He did not sense the scrutiny of the Europe and at last, the Second World War had begun. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    o The amount is 54 billion American dollars. * There were already arguments along the allies themselves, that this will bring not only the Germany economy down but the Global economy.

  2. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    Hobson provides Lenin with the framework for analyzing imperialism; but whereas Hobson a mature capitalist country can and should avoid imperialism, Lenin insists that it is the inevitable product of capitalism. In addition to their dissimilarities in one common idea, there were numerous incidents and facts that contradict with the

  1. The League of Nations was a failure. How far do you agree with this ...

    However, the trade of oil and coal was not banned; this is because the League feared the Americans would not support sanctions and it would mean 30,000 British coal miners would lose their job. The decision on opening the Suez canal was not from the League - the British and

  2. Neville Chamberlain and Appeasement

    controversial document as it challenged the accepted view on Hitler by identifying him as a mere opportunist. Taylor also said about Chamberlain: "He was a meticulous housemaid, great at tidying up." Taylor's It's very valuable considering Taylor's huge experience in the field of history, with over 46 published books, and the fact that he lived at the time.

  1. What Effect Did World War II have on Eastern Europe?

    At first, the government tried to suppress anti-communist groups. Later, due to nationwide strikes in 1988, the government agreed to have roundtable talks with opposition groups. The roundtable talks produced an agreement that would allow free elections in the country.

  2. Nazi Germany

    is indecisive - Abolish the Treaty of Versailles, b/c reparations are just making problems to Germany - Get rid of unemployment by letting the people to join the army, be used for public works,... The Democratic parties were unable to get Germany back to work, so the elderly, the unemployed

  1. What were the Aims and Achievements of Stalins Foreign Policy between 1928 and 1941?

    Through pursuit of the popular front, Stalin appeared to be a step closer to securing allies and protecting Russia, yet the Czechoslovakian crisis highlighted the lack of commitment to the policy of collective security on the part of Britain and France.

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    Blockade Zones after New Plea from Thant on Talks.?[22] The matter then progressed to uprooting the offensive arms in Cuba. With the standstill of the Soviet ships as well as the US?s assurance of non-violence movement, the US delegation, led by John J.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work