• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Second World War was brought about by the foreign policy of Hitler and Nazi Germany. Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Second World War was brought about by the foreign policy of Hitler and Nazi Germany." Do you agree with this statement? Many key issues, several occurring simultaneously during the 1930s, caused the Second World War. Many changes occurred in countries over the world, from the end of the First World War in 1918 and onwards the rise of Hitler with the new regime of Nazi in Germany, during economic crisis in 1928. The period of warlike tensions existed between 1929 until 1939 when Second World War finally broke out, when Britain and France declared a World War against Germany after Germany's invasion of Poland occurred on the 1st of September 1939. It is mostly argued that the Second World War broke out as a result of Hitler's aggressive foreign policy however others argue that this was also resulted by Western forces' policy of Appeasement at the same time. Furthermore, the Second World War was produced by combinations of others as well; Italy's Mussolini and USSR's Stalin had also helped to afflict the warlike tension in Europe; the failure of Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations had failed to maintain peace and to avoid a war at the first time. ...read more.

Middle

New regimes of dictatorship emerged in some nations as the new leaders promised a better world for them. Weaknesses of economy in some particular nations were directly led to increased aggression and invasions to other countries, to distract the sense of weaknesses in the inside. This tension of international relationships and the disastrous impact resulted from the Economic depression later rose to alternative policies, such as to the policy of appeasement. Another key factor was the policy of Appeasement during 1936-1938. Britain and France went through the political and economical turmoil after the WW1 and later by the economic depression in 1929, therefore was more concerned about their own affairs than what was going on in the rest of Europe. Britain and France were reluctant to take a firm line against aggressive Germany. As a result, the new regimes of Hitler accelerated rapidly, with Britain and France fulfilling its momentum to expand its endless requisitions. By this Hitler was able to gain what he wanted to get; the first was the remilitarisation of Rhineland in 1936 when the rest of the world was focusing on the Abyssinian crisis in Africa. Having accomplished his first objectives in 'Rearmament', he then challenged to his territorial promises and focused on the eastern territories - Austria, Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia. ...read more.

Conclusion

Chamberlain from Britain now lost faith in Appeasement: as Hitler promised that 'Sudetenland is the last problem... territorial claim which I (Hitler) have to make in Europe' was betrayed, now were followed to keep the guarantee to defend Poland if attacked. As a result of a devastate world after the First World War and later the Economic depression, nationalism of rearmament and aggression threatened a war to happen and, at last, was ironically declared by Britain and France. In my opinion, Hitler's aggressive foreign policy had most contributed to start the Second World War although other factors was linked to each other for the outbreak. It was Britain and France who first declared a war; however it was inevitable because Hitler's foreign policy of aggression had already provided enough reason for a war in Europe. His unlimited ambition and requisitions had betrayed Britain's faith on the Appeasement and had gone too far. He also attempted too much on the annexation of Eastern European countries, too convinced with confidence that war would not happen. Moreover, his diplomatic alliances with the communist USSR seemed nonsense, to France and Britain's surprise, it was hypocrisy because he was an absolute anti-communist. He did not sense the scrutiny of the Europe and at last, the Second World War had begun. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The League of Nations was a failure. How far do you agree with this ...

    However, the trade of oil and coal was not banned; this is because the League feared the Americans would not support sanctions and it would mean 30,000 British coal miners would lose their job. The decision on opening the Suez canal was not from the League - the British and

  2. What Effect Did World War II have on Eastern Europe?

    The occupiers destroyed Polish art and sculptures and looted museums. Schools were shut down in an effort to suppress the population. The Polish underground movement with the help of wealthy individuals and the Catholic Church were able to keep some aspects of culture alive, including plays, concert, and salvaging valuable artifacts from museums25.

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    The Truman Doctrine is a military doctrine d. The Communists in Greece had tried to takeover in 1944, but the British army had prevented this and Stalin was studiously careful not to intervene in Greece. This was probably in accordance with the Percentage Agreements he had reached with Churchill in 1944 (they were both probably drunk).

  2. Historical Investigation - League of Nations - Abyssinian crisis

    popularity for the election.21 Mussolini still wanted to compromise because he thought Hoare only made his statement to talk tough to satisfy the public.22 C. Evaluation of Sources Haile Selassie, "Appeal to the League of Nations," June 1936. This speech "Appeal to the League of Nations," obtained from the reliable

  1. League of Nations

    Which of the participants in the Manchuria crisis do you think the cartoonist most sympathises with? Explain your answer. I believe that the cartoonist most sympathises with is Britain, France and Manchuria. Since both France and Britain had to pick of the pieces of the League when Japan successfully

  2. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    * The German army was also drastically reduced in numbers, to become controllable by France. The Germans were no longer allowed to use conscription and could not have more than 100,000 troops. o In addition, the manufacturing of weapons was no longer prohibited not even its export or import.

  1. What were the Aims and Achievements of Stalins Foreign Policy between 1928 and 1941?

    Stalin, although with the same foreign policy aims of gaining security and trade relations to further industrial development, dramatically changed the way in which he went about achieving them with the formation of a Popular Front from 1934-37. From previously flaunting the conditions of Versailles by making available land and

  2. Opposition in Nazi Germany

    A medical student, Scholl became increasing interested in the arts and inwardly began to question the Nazi regime. This was reinforced in 1941, after Hans Scholl attended a sermon by Bishop August von Galen with his sister Sophie. An outspoken opponent of Hitler, von Galen railed against the Nazis' euthanasia policies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work