• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Civil War was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and failures of leadership on both sides Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Alice Wang IB HOA 1 DBQ Civil War :) Inevitability of Civil War Validity "The Civil War was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and failures of leadership on both sides" The Civil War was mainly based on the different ideological beliefs of slavery between the North and the South. Almost all sectional conflicts such as the Nullification Crisis and Kansas-Nebraska Act revolved around slavery issues, which can been traced back to the earliest years of American colonization. With a Southern agrarian economy in contrast to a Northern industrial economy, the South felt threatened and felt that slavery was the only stable force that kept its economy grounded. Furthermore, prominent Southern and Northern politicians convinced the mainstream to follow their extremist and biased beliefs, further dividing the two regions. With slavery underlying the South's desire to seek independence, state rights, and ultimately the continuation of southern culture, succession was unavoidable. The Civil War was inevitable because of the result of extremism and failures of leadership on both sides. The presence of slavery had slowly built up sectionalist tensions between the North and South during the 19th century. The history and economy of the North were very different from those of the South. While the North developed booming factories, the South built large cotton plantations. By the early 1800s, Northern factories were producing many of those same goods as the South. ...read more.


Tensions arose when Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois repealed the line imposed by the Missouri Compromise by passing the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Senator Douglas (Document D) felt that Kansas and Nebraska should have a right to be subjected to popular sovereignty like the other western territories. The Kansas-Nebraska Act resulted in the establishment of two opposing legislatures within the Kansas territory, further heightening the tensions between the North and South. Violence soon erupted, with the anti-slavery forces led by John Brown (Document H) against the pro-slavery settlers. Because President Franklin Pierce was more biased toward the pro-slavery legislature, he sent in Federal troops to stop the violence and disperse the anti-slavery legislature. Stephen Douglas's poor decision making resulted in increased sectionalist beliefs between the North and the South. Although the majority of the American people including many moderate politicians like Abraham Lincoln (Document F) wanted to avoid the Civil War and were content to allow slavery to die a slow, inevitable death, the most influential political leaders of the 19th century were not. The South had an economic interest in the spread of slavery to the new territories so that new slave states could be created and the South's political influence would remain strong. The North had an interest in limiting the spread of slavery into the new territories for both purposes of controlling Southern political power. Also, while Southern politicians believed that they were guaranteed the "right" to own slaves, Northern abolitionists believed that slavery offended their moral and ethical principles. ...read more.


They also stated that the federal government was not permitted to interfere with slavery in those states where it already existed. They felt that a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution in conjunction with nullification, or secession would protect their way of life. Therefore, South Carolina decided to write A Declaration of the Causes (Document I). Because of the threat that the North imposed to the South, the South felt that secession was inevitable to maintain their agrarian economy secure. The Civil War was triggered by the extremism of both pro-slavery and anti-slavery parties and the sectionalist beliefs that influential politicians engraved on the minds of the majority. The existence of slavery was the key component that initiated tensions between the North and South; if there were no disagreements over slavery, the Civil War could have been avoidable. With the contrast of an industrial and agricultural economy, the South felt threatened by the balance of power between the two regions. Because the South felt that slavery was crucial to their economic stability, succession felt inevitable to them. Moreover, Southern politicians and Northern abolitionists further aggravated the division of the two regions by exposing sectionalist beliefs to the mainstream that would otherwise have been ignored. Because slavery underlined the South's desire to seek independence, state rights, and ultimately the continuation of southern culture, succession was inevitable. Lincoln once said that "A house divided against itself cannot stand....this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free (Document F)." Lincoln knew that because slavery formed two opposing divisions and that slavery could never be abolished, the Civil War was inevitable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. How did the American anticommunism beliefs help advance the civil rights movement in the ...

    WWII when segregation had dwindled down in labor factories to help the economy. Hoover associated himself with the NAACP to reveal any suspected Communists because the NAACP clearly labeled itself as anti-communist, which proves that Hoover possibly accused blacks through his racist beliefs.

  2. the causes and consequences of the spanish civil war

    The CEDA also proved to be a factor that increased political tension, as if any more was needed. It was lead by Gil Robles, who was certainly no supporter of democracy, declaring in 1933 that 'We are going to parliament to defend our ideals; but if tomorrow parliament is against

  1. Absolutism DBQ

    Another similarity between the two governments was that both rulers accepted and promoted the Divine Right of Kings. Charles I, a king, would obviously not want to lose his power so he accepted and promoted the Divine Right which allowed him and other kings to do what they wanted because according to this, only God could judge kings.

  2. Evaluate the successes and failures of one ruler of a single-party state

    country was in fact a success, for it strengthened the USSR, steeling it against the Nazi threat, and for many years after Stalin's death, ensured that it remained a communist country. The five-year plans were first launched in 1928, in a bid by Stalin to bring about rapid industrialization to the then largely agrarian Soviet Union.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Democratic Successes and Failures of Andrew Jackson and Nelson Mandela

    presidency due to his defiance of other governmental bodies and, once again, his stubbornness to pursue what he saw best for himself, the presidency, and the nation despite the opposition of other institutions. Jackson disregarded the Constitution in favor of what he interpreted the people as wanting, reiterating problems from

  2. Notes on the Causes of the American Civil War

    1819- Missouri applied to join the Union as a slave state 3. Northern states opposed their entrance as it would tilt the Congress against them 4. The Missouri Comprise- Missouri can enter as a Slave state with the creation of Maine as a free state.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - The Arab states perpetuated the belief in Israel that they were totally dedicated to its destruction - Arab countries were actually in upheaval; they could not muster unity for military strikes, so they had to resort to economic sanctions against Israel, closing the Suez Canal in 1951 - In

  2. Assess the success and failures of the British mandates in Palestine

    Within this White Paper it was also made clear that in the McMahon ? Hussein correspondence there was never a promise of an independent state within Palestine. The White Paper said that neither party was ever going to be satisfied with what the British Empire was offering them, but that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work