• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An Investigation into Voluntary Censorship during the first six months of the Korean War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

An Historical Investigation IB History Internal Assessment Michael Zuber Student Number: 002351-060 Coll�ge du L�man School Number: 002351 Word Count: 1846 words An Investigation into Voluntary Censorship during the first six months of the Korean War. Table of Contents A. Plan of Investigation 2 B. Summary of Evidence 2 C. Evaluation of Sources 5 D. Analysis 6 E. Conclusion 9 F. Bibliography 10 A. Plan of Investigation (85 words) This investigation examines the extent to which media censorship in the United States during the initial stages of the Korean War (up to December 21, 19501), was voluntary. December 21, 1950 was the date that General MacArthur imposed full censorship on all media output.2 In addition to his manipulation of information, General MacArthur's role in censorship of information is also analyzed. Two sources, U.S. Television News and Cold War Propaganda, 1947-1960, by Nancy Bernhard and Selling the Korean War, by Steven Casey are evaluated. B. Summary of Evidence (526 words) Propaganda has been used throughout history in order to shape opinion and perception.3 In the twentieth century, an expansion in communications media caused for propaganda to be used more persuasively than ever before.4 War propaganda has often been subject to censorship and the Korean War was no exception. During the initial stages of the Korean War, eye-witness reports stated that South Korean troops were deserting, causing MacArthur's headquarters to issue a counter report declaring that reports of a South Korean collapse had been exaggerated.5 This led to President Truman giving MacArthur control over all of the UN forces in ...read more.

Middle

Selling the Korean War: Propaganda, Politics, and Public Opinion, 1950-1953, by Steven Casey, a PhD in International Relations and expert on US foreign policy since 1933,26 is written with the same view as that of Bernhard and therefore both books serve as a complement to one another, thereby increasing their values. The purpose of Casey's book is to look at the "attempts by the US military in Korea to shape, manipulate and mould the images and stories from the actual fighting fronts."27 The book was published in 2008 and therefore gave the already well-respected author access to a wide range of sources including books, articles and personal interviews. The book has also been given rave reviews by many other respected historians such as Ralph B. Levering.28 However, Casey could be guilty of exaggerating the extent to which the US government tried to 'sell' the Korean War to its people. His ideas seem very one-sided and he often does not argue his case objectively. This causes for a certain degree of bias and slightly limits the value of the book. D. Analysis (772 words) Although censorship was supposedly voluntary, a perplexing situation had occurred: officially there was no censorship, but reporters were warned not to reveal delicate information.29 In a press statement by MacArthur's press officer, Colonel Echols, journalists were told that they were not to state "specific units, sizes, titles, places of landings, locations and troop movements" in their articles/stories.30 Also, voluntary censorship came with problems. ...read more.

Conclusion

information bureaus for their every day stories.51 For example, reporters from both the Chicago Tribune and the Daily Worker depended on the Office of Public Affairs (PA) for almost all their main stories.52 Also, reporters normally treated PA officers as primary sources of information.53 The fact that most television networks obtained most of their film from government produced films allowed the US government to control the spread of public information.54 Therefore, even though there technically existed a voluntary censorship system, most information given to news agencies was already censored. However, many (such as reporters from the New York Times) felt that this censorship was crucial in ensuring military security.55 The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) also played a critical role in the spread of information in the United States. Shortly before the Korean War started, many (but not all) broadcasting stations associated themselves with the NAB. Justin Miller, president of the NAB stated that he thought it necessary to preserve the American way of life and therefore gave full cooperation to the American objective which undoubtedly led to censorship of information. 56 E. Conclusion (72 words) Technically, 'voluntary censorship' during the Korean War was the only type of censorship that existed. Also, many organizations, including the NAB, in the United States did practice voluntary censorship as they thought it necessary in order to protect the American people. However, in reality censorship started long before information was even given to the media. MacArthur ensured that information given to journalists was information that he considered safe enough to let out. F. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. WW2 historical investigation. To assess the degree to which intelligence lead to the victory ...

    1 Ultra gave information that was highly valuable to the Allies such as where refuelling was to take place, and where the U-boats where currently patrolling. 2 However, the inconsistency with which Ultra was broken and the limited amount of messages read makes the actual operational value hard to assess.

  2. World War 1 Information

    makes it clear that France will not allow Germany to bully France, even if the result is war > An agreement is reached between Germany and France. France sees Morocco as French territory and France gives some of the French Congo to Germany.

  1. Schlieffen Plan - analysis of the sources

    Germany's imperialism even went as far as to try to challenge the French claimed territories in Africa to prove its superiority increasing the tension between the two countries thus making war more probable. In Source A, Crown Prince Wilhelm states that war is the only way for Germany's nationalism/imperialism to be showcased.

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    There was a left wing coalition in 1945. The leaders of the other parties were executed and the communists took power e) Baltic States. Estonia Latvia and Lithuania were all under soviet and communist rule. Finland hung on to a precarious independence f)

  1. Wars frequently begin ten years before the first shot is fired. To what extent ...

    During this time period, with a political, diplomatic and social emphasis on military power as a marker of a nation's strength and prestige, Bismark took Germany on a conquest to increase Germany's territory and rival Britain. This militarism was the cause of fundamental tensions between the European powers, together with the alliance system, especially between Germany, France and Russia.

  2. Historical Investigation

    and soldiers, which left "even the healthiest...veterans perplexed and embittered at a nation, culture, and people capable of devising such attacks." Miller, E. (2007). War Plan Orange: The U.S. Strategy to Defeat Japan, 1897-1945. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press In this book, the author, Edward Miller, had wrote this book

  1. To what extent was the advent of the Cold War an outcome of Stalin(TM)s ...

    Its main purpose was to defeat Nazism and it was only formed when Hitler attacked Russia by in June 1941 and his ally Japan attacked the US fleet Pearl Harbour in December. The Big Three might have given the sense of comradeship but underlying hostility, much of which was caused

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    denied basic rights and opportunities; they could also have their land expropriated for no reason - The Israeli populace viewed the Arabs with suspicion (seen as a fifth column); because Israel was at war with their countries - In any case the two populations inside Israel lived very separate lives,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work