Analyse the causes and consequences of Glasnost and Perestroika up until 2000

Authors Avatar by jmojto006 (student)

History HL                Jan Mojto

Analyse the causes and consequences of Glasnost and Perestroika up until 2000.

In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev was appointed the General Secretary of the party. Economic decline in the 1980s worsened the political climate, inspiring people to protest and raise their demands for better standard of living and education. Russia was in desperate need for change, which led to Gorbachev taking action through Glasnost and Perestroika. In this essay I’ll analyze what triggered him to adopt these policies and their consequences.

Firstly, Glasnost and Perestroika were adopted to reform Communism.

Gorbachev recognized the need to reform communism, as the economy wasn’t working. People were unsatisfied with the current conditions and demanded change, as it directly affected their lives. The 1986 Chernobyl disaster is a key example that demonstrates the failure of communism to keep people informed of the full extents of danger it brought along. Thus many people suffered as result of inadequate information. The communist regime was outdated and slow adapting to change. Compared to West, it was well behind in technological advances and food production. News about situation in West was quickly spreading along the Soviet Union, inspiring people in their demands for freedom and reform. Keeping people informed and reforming economy would thus help to alleviate the problems of Soviet Union.

Economic Stagnation was a main reason for adopting Perestroika. In the mid 1980s there was a heavy subsidization of essential goods. For example basic food, but its scarcity meant that even this wasn’t very successful. Oil, gas and coal production were below estimates in 1985. Attempts of improving the so well demanded consumer goods were ineffective. USSR heavily relied on imports from US and India. This meant that it wasn’t self sufficient in providing food for its people. Many people hungered, as food didn’t reach them; a fact exacerbated by the poor storage and transportation facilities. Large inflation even made food, products and services more expensive, meaning people could afford to buy less, which lowered their living standard. The command economy led to low productivity and labor shortages, as workers weren’t motivated to produce for the collective gain, knowing their personal gain from working hard would be very little. Alcoholism among workers led to further inefficiencies in production. Perestroika would allow people to work for their own gain and profit, thus improving the efficiency of the economy.

Join now!

Political stagnation was also a cause for Perestroika. Political change was necessary for economical change and Glasnot to take place. For Gorbachev’s policies to succeed, he needed the support of reformers. Since 60 percent of the Central Committee was made up of Brezhnev’s supporters, political reform was difficult to be implemented. Nomenklatura was against change, as it would withdraw their special privileges. Party officials obstructed reforms and higher production of better quality consumer goods, ironically calling it another Five Year plans, an inefficient economic project during Stalin’s era. Also, lack of democracy during elections meant that the Communist Party ...

This is a preview of the whole essay