• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the causes and consequences of Glasnost and Perestroika up until 2000

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐History HL Jan Mojto Analyse the causes and consequences of Glasnost and Perestroika up until 2000. In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev was appointed the General Secretary of the party. Economic decline in the 1980s worsened the political climate, inspiring people to protest and raise their demands for better standard of living and education. Russia was in desperate need for change, which led to Gorbachev taking action through Glasnost and Perestroika. In this essay I?ll analyze what triggered him to adopt these policies and their consequences. Firstly, Glasnost and Perestroika were adopted to reform Communism. Gorbachev recognized the need to reform communism, as the economy wasn?t working. People were unsatisfied with the current conditions and demanded change, as it directly affected their lives. The 1986 Chernobyl disaster is a key example that demonstrates the failure of communism to keep people informed of the full extents of danger it brought along. Thus many people suffered as result of inadequate information. The communist regime was outdated and slow adapting to change. Compared to West, it was well behind in technological advances and food production. News about situation in West was quickly spreading along the Soviet Union, inspiring people in their demands for freedom and reform. Keeping people informed and reforming economy would thus help to alleviate the problems of Soviet Union. Economic Stagnation was a main reason for adopting Perestroika. ...read more.

Middle

Spending on nuclear weapons also battered the budget of Soviet Union. Instead, the money could have been used for the benefit of people?? more consumer good or improved living conditions. Military spending was an enormous drain on the Soviet Economy and there needed new set of reforms through Perestroika that would make the use of finances for military more efficient. Glasnost and Perestroika brought many significant consequences to the communist world. Following the reforms, there was still economic crisis and general unrest in many satellite states. Strikes among member countries increased. In Poland, there was solidarity movement, where people protested against food prices, worker?s conditions and the poor economic climate. Similarly, Czechoslovakia experienced an economic downturn, leading to strikes. The turning point in Czechoslovakia was the Velvet Revolution in 1989, which further encouraged people to take part in active protest against Communism. Glasnot called for more openness and freedom of speech. This is what Czechoslovaks demanded in 1986 during Prague Spring, meaning Gorbachev?s policies renewed their previous demands. Reforms adopted by Gorbachev evoked similar demands for change in Czechoslovakia. Food prices went up by 48 percent in Poland. Stagnation led to huge deficits, especially for countries that borrowed during 1977. Satellite states found themselves in a need of economical reform and more openness. Demands for democracy intensified. This could been seen in Czechoslovakia, Poland and Germany. ...read more.

Conclusion

The election of Archbishop of Cracow, as Pope John Paul further increased its nationalistic feelings. In Czechoslovakia, the Vons movement outlined the unjustly imprisonment and unjust prosecution. Calls for Germany to be reunified intensified, especially after Gorbachev visited Germany. Western media gave full cover of his policies, so especially East Germany demanded reform. There were demonstrations in Lepizig and Dresden. Fall of Berlin wall symbolized independence for Germany. In 1990 Gorbachev visited Lithania, where he was received with calls for independence, a similar response of the Muslim Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan. Soviet Union was falling apart, brick by brick; meaning its breakdown was bound to occur sooner or later. In January 1992, there was a collapse of Soviet Union. Gorbachev?s policies didn?t go the way he intended them to. Two years following Perestroika, the economy couldn?t be modernized in accordance to people?s expectations. Nationalistic movements in satellite states strongly demanded independence form Soviet Union, to the point it started to disintegrate. In July 1990, Ukraine declared its independence, shortly followed by other countries. Commonwealth of Independent States were formed. It was obvious Communism came to its end, with official end being announced on 31 December 1991. All in all, I was able to identify four causes for Glasnot and Perestroika with five consequences. I personally believe that the main cause was the competitiveness with the West and the fact that capitalism worked better in practice. Combined with poor conditions in Soviet Union and inefficient run, opposition from different countries was bound to bring it to collapse. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. the causes and consequences of the spanish civil war

    Matters did not stop there. Not only did the government nationalize church property, but it abolished the Concordat with Rome. This is the agreement set between the papacy and the country. The Church was extremely provoked and any devout Spanish Catholic.

  2. Revision notes - Causes of the French Revolution and the Development of the Revolution ...

    He then ordered the deputies to disperse to their different meeting places. The National Assembly refused to go. The next day Third Estate was joined by 151clergy and 47 nobles. Meanwhile popular demonstrations broke out in Paris and elsewhere in support of National Assembly.

  1. To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow(TM)s hold over Czechoslovakia, and Eastern ...

    Its conception was supposed to have simmered down the chaos of the great 'melting pot', however, this was not the case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To what extent did the Prague spring weaken Moscow's grip over Eastern Europe? "Incongruence between Communism and Czech disposition has a history which reveals long and genuine striving

  2. To what extent, if any, did the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster contribute to the fall ...

    Gorbachev also worked to establish international goodwill and a reduction in Cold War hostility, but April 26, 1986 sparked a new challenge to the Soviet government and to the General Secretary.5 The explosion of reactor number four at the Chernobyl power plant, located in the town of Pripyat, interrupted Gorbachev's campaign.

  1. Soviet Union Economy

    industry production increased by far, being this still remarkable since the targets were very high. Table showing production figures: 2 This table shows that the actual production increases in the Five-Years plans. From 1913 to 1940, there is a general and high rate of increase.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Effects of Witte?s economic policies 1. Increase in foreign investment 26% 1890 41% 1915. 1900 20% of expenditure was servicing debt (2% went to education). Overdependence on foreign money. 2. Railways lowered transport costs and stimulated trade (mostly Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands).

  1. Was Gorbachev the main reason for ending the Cold War?

    Furthermore, Reagan?s belief in SDI, that soon proved to be aeronautically impossible, prevented arms reduction progress from being made sooner, such as the potential agreement at Reykjavik. Gaddis is correct in his statement that ?Reagan presided over the most solid programme in arms control?, yet incorrect in his assertion that

  2. A period of economic and political stagnation. How valid is this assessment of the ...

    accomplish his goals and the ideal remedy to ?the terror of Stalin?s reign and the chaos of Khrushchev?s? according to Hughes and Welfare. Yet the goals set during the Brezhnev years were ones designed not to benefit the Soviet Union as a whole, but rather the nomenklatura and those privileged

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work