• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the reason for, and the nature of, opposition to tsardom in Russia between 1855 and 1894.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐BEATRICE FERRO Analyse the reason for, and the nature of, opposition to tsardom in Russia between 1855 and 1894. The period between 1855 and 1894 covered the reigns of Alexander II and his son, Alexander III. Both of these Tsars were opposed because of their autocratic nature of tsarist rule and the backward state of Russia, both economically and politically. Alexander II realised the danger to Tsardom and did introduce many reforms, most known for emancipating the serfs, to try and stem opposition, but he failed to introduce a national duma. Alexander III, shocked by his father's assassination, followed a policy of repression. The oppositions varied, they included political activists, revolutionaries, peasants and workers. Many of the nobles as well opposed various policies, especially the emancipation. Educational reforms also led to a series of riots and opposition to individual policies. Alexander II could be considered as reactionary as his son, they both pursued similar aims: strengthening Russia and improving its international position while maintaining autocracy. Alexander III did follow some of his father's reforms but the economic progress during the 1880's and 1890's were crucial steps towards modernization. Alexander II could be seen as a reformer, a ?Liberator?, whilst his son, a conservative reactionary. There were many different reasons for why there was so much opposition towards tsardom. First of all, the nationalities: an example is the Polish revolt of 1863. ...read more.


However, this had little success, the peasants either did not accept, or did not understand, the revolutionary message being sent to them. In despair, some turned to terrorism, as they thought it was the only way in achieving their aims. In 1897, a group called ?People's Will? was founded with the intention of murdering members of the major powers, the ruling class. This group had no more than 400 members and was responsible for tha assassination of Alexander II in 1881. However, this act of violence did not strenght the movement, but instead, weakened the movement. The importance of this group was not the ideas, but the method it was using. Its concept of using peasants to start a revolt seemed unrealistic. The peasantry were highly distrustful as they very conservative, religious and illiterate. This movement although gave an example to all the revolutionaries of the late nineteenth century, they were influenced and if not inspired, by them challenging Tsardom. The nobility also had a reason for opposing tsardom; this included the Emancipation of the serfs. They wouldn't accept their loss of a third of their land; though they were compensated for this, much of it went off to pay debts. Nobles were also against the fact that they had now also lost their great social influence and prestige. Their financial and social status depended on the serfs and therefore opposed the idea of losing their wealth in favour of the peasants. ...read more.


These opposition groups were although significant as they encouraged opposition against the Tsar for later revolutionaries. They also managed to make the later oppositions question themselves about how effective the revolutions were, and if not how they should improve. Such as: if the peasants were ready for a revolt, if political violence should be used againsts the state and who should be leading the revolution. Clearly, such considerations had an impact on Lenin and the Bolsheviks. The nature of the oppositions were secretive, which meant that the revolutionary oppositions could not mobilise peasant discontent which was the greatest threat to stability. There was a lack of political tradition in Russia which meant that the opposition's thinking tended to be utiopian in character rather that following the realities of how a state should be governed. There was no clear or united groups in the oppositions, but instead very different, and often conflicting, thoughts of ?what is to be done?. The conservative interests were too strong, even if the nobility were angry with Alexander II and III, they still weren't going to support the revolutionaries against him. The people might have been successful in killing Alexander II in 1881, but this surely did not lead to a greater reform or revolution. Instead, it strengthened the ways to put down opposition, as it was seen in the harsh treatment against the revolutionaries during the reighn of Alexander III. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The policies of Alexander II and III of Russia

    intention, the task of ruling, with faith in the strength and truth of autocratic power. We are summoned to reaffirm that Power and preserve it for the benefit of the people from any encroachment.' This excerpt has been taken from Alexander III's 'Manifesto of Unshakeable Autocracy'.

  2. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    Policies were pursued which reflected growth of national liberation movements and the fear of further Polish revolts. Anti Semitism increased with restrictions on where Jews could live and what jobs they could hold. Pogroms (killings of the Jews) became more frequent with the government actively encouraging murderers.

  1. To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions?

    However this new reform was far from perfect. Peasants were excluded from the new system and had to be content with justice dispensed by the local courts and government-appointed justices of the peace. Furthermore, later in his reign, political trials tested the new system, which suffered from new restrictions.

  2. Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the ...

    lured Rasputin to his palace and together with Purishkevich (a reactionary deputy in the Duma) and Grand Duke Dmitrii (the Tsar's nephew), shot him.6 This event caused Alexandra and Nicolas II to have a closer relationship which thus enables her to still control her husband (to the displeasure of the monarchs and masses).

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Many serfs believed that the Tsar never meant for them to pay and thus that the landowners were lying to them. Abstract property rights were beyond them. Sir Donald Mackenzie Wallace Russia on the eve of War and Revolution ?If the serfs had a great many ill-defined obligations to

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Election Day (1 week exactly), the Reichstag building went up in flames. A young Dutch communist called Marinus Van der Lubbe was caught at the place. It made no doubt that he was the responsible for the fire. Goering who was searching for a way to get rid of the

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    In order to fill these new administrative roles he called upon the local people. In 1864, new governing bodies were created called zemstva, zemstvo singular. The members were chosen by three electoral colleges, representing the peasants, townspeople and the gentry.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - In June 1975, Sadat reopened the Suez Canal - In September 1975, US Secretary of State Kissinger achieved a Second Disengagement Agreement between Israeli and Egyptian forces: - Egypt recovered the Abu Rudeis oil fields in western Sinai - Israel left the Giddi and Mitla passes - US electronic

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work