• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the role played and the responsibility in the outbreak of war in 1914 by any two nations (with exception to Germany)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Standard Level History Analyse the role played and the responsibility in the outbreak of war in 1914 by any two nations (with exception to Germany) Michael Yip, Dartford Grammar Nations and their subsequent actions precipitated the outbreak of war. The statement is a given, when considering the fundamental logic of cause and effect. Despite such simplicity, the events prior to WWI were a complex tangle of individual nations? contextual factors, intentions and (subsequently,) actions which would inherently accelerate (and destabilise) Europe to the point at which war would break out. There are numerous examples of ?complex tangles of actions?, spewing from a variety of different nations. Despite their importance, one should not forget the impact of contextual factors and intentions; it is these that ultimately affect actions. Whilst each individual power?s role in WWI are meaningful and worth analysing on their part, Austria- Hungary and Serbia are of both particular importance and interest as events prior to war consistently revolve around the significant actions of these two nation states, interlinking these. Also, Serbia had always been a massive problem of Austrian- Hungarian foreign policy and severe concern. Whilst significant actions do not directly correlate to heightened responsibility- each nation has some level of responsibility for the outbreak of war, whether their intentions apparent today are good or bad. It should be after careful consideration of (at the very least) ...read more.

Middle

Firstly, Austria issues an Ultimatum- which, in short, demanded the relinquishment of Serbian sovereignty to the Austrian- Hungarian State. This was made clearer in the sixth demand (which Serbia rejected), which demanded for Austrian police to have jurisdiction within Serbian borders and to investigate themselves links to the terrorist group, the ?Black Hand? (which the assassin belonged to). The issuance of the Ultimatum was aggressive- the demands impossible to agree to without compromising sovereign integrity, and the existence of the State of Serbia itself. After the war, it was made clear that the demands of the Ultimatum were in fact intentionally made impossible to agree to- precipitating some form of retaliation from Austria- Hungary (upon Serbia?s refusal), be that diplomatically or (quite certainly,) through military means. This shows Austrian- Hungarian aggression and want for war. Admittedly, Austria- Hungary?s role in events prior to the war only dramatically increased in magnitude and aggression as time went on- it was in latter stages of relative peace that Austria- Hungary issued the Ultimatum. Considering past events, what is the extent of Austria- Hungary?s responsibility for causing the war? Serbia?s actions are not much justified, I think. Colonialism was a fever that swept the few capable, European states. In addition, Austria- Hungary?s foreign policy on was not as aggressive as Germany?s Weltpolitik, which was the most aggressive nationalist- Imperialist policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

In any case, the intention was to unite all Serbian people, which was justifiable. The refusal of the Ultimatum is perhaps complex to argue whether or not it holds responsibility to start of the war. Whilst preserving sovereignty was vital, and influenced decision most- one may ask if Serbia accepted all the terms of the Ultimatum whether the war would have broken out. Austria- Hungary would be unlikely to declare war once the Austrian police had ingratiated it within Serbian circles, to slowly decay its independence. Despite these conflicts of sacrifice, I believe that the refusal was justified; despite the war that ensued (other factors and other nations would have played a part). Assuming that Serbia did not sponsor the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife, I believe their responsibility of causing the war to be minimal, much more so than Austria- Hungary?s. Serbia did not, for example, immediately press for war to settle the matter. Serbia acted solely in the interests of itself; uniting its people, expanding (to reasonable lengths,) territorially and rejecting the Ultimatum. In conclusion, Serbia?s responsibility and role which lead to war in 1914 was that of a lesser one, if negligible in accordance to her virtually nonexistent expansionist or aggressive aims, acting solely for the interests for its people, whereas that of Austria- Hungary?s was greater with her aggressive strategies with unnecessary Balkan ambitions to fight a long, bloody war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Was germany to blame for WWI?

    Fritz Fischer said that Germany was planning the war in order to become a great world power. According to Fischer, when Franz Ferdinand was assassinated Germany encouraged Austria Hungary to start a war against Serbia. Germany gave Austria Hungary a blank cheque to attack Serbia meaning they would support Austria Hungary in whatever they wanted to do.

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    In 1961, the Soviets and Americans had a close war encounter when tanks on either side of the wall lined up against each other NATO and the Warsaw Pact - NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization - Ever since the Truman Doctrine there was the question of how this Doctrine could

  1. Nazi Germany

    The plot failed, Hitler survived and terribly revenged. How did the Nazis deal with the Churches ??? - in the early stages of the Nazi regime - co-operation between Nazis and the Churches (Hitler signed a Concordat with the Catholic Church in 1933, agreeing to leave the Cath.Ch.

  2. How valid is to claim that "Europe stumbled into a war in 1914"?

    This supports the fact that Austria was keen to fight a war with the Serbs in order to solve the internal problems they had to face due to nationalism. This is emphasized by the Austrian ultimatum, considered unreasonable as it stated in one of its terms that the Serbs would have to allow Austrian officials inside their territory.

  1. Historical Investigation - League of Nations - Abyssinian crisis

    Instead, the LON tried to sell off the weaker country to gain peace. Additionally, the LON was aiming for collective security where all countries contribute to keep the peace; however, other countries were too weak to support Britain and France, which were the only two major European powers in the LON.

  2. Assess the importance of Balkan Nationalism as a reason for the outbreak of the ...

    The Balkans, seen how behind their back the Great Powers were making decisions for them, felt cheated, which increased their nationalism even more. So the Great Powers rather stimulated nationalism by doing this than stopping it. In the First Balkan War, The Bulgarians declared war against Greece and Serbia.

  1. Lasting from the fifteenth to the eighteenth centuries, the outbreak of the Black Death ...

    The causes of the plague were not determined yet, although people were close, because they weren?t educated well enough. Another clueless physician, M. Bertrand, explained that he believed in a religious answer. He said that God was angry about the sinful people so he caused the Plague (Doc#16).

  2. To what extent was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in Europe in ...

    The Z plan particularly suggested that Hitler was seeking war beyond the quest for Lebensraum, as a navy was not necessary for this. Hitler?s plans indicate that he expected war and was prepared for a war greater than that for land in the East, implying he may have had plans to expand further into Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work