• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis on Emiliano Zapata

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Plan of Investigation To what extent does Emiliano Zapata deserve the title "Father of the Mexican Revolution?" This paper will discuss characteristics and actions of Emiliano Zapata as a leader; in order to draw a valid conclusion as to what extent does he deserve the title "Father of the Mexican Revolution." By drawing on the expertise of various historians, an evaluation of his character and leadership will be formed, referencing the assertions of historians in regards to the positive and negative aspects of his life. Based on the evidence, an analysis will be presented discussing the factors which result to the conclusion. In addition to examining the life of Zapata, light will be shed upon the revolutionaries Francisco Madero and Pancho Villa. This will give a comparison among the figures, and aid in extracting analysis on Zapata's importance in the Mexican Revolution of 1910. The sources that will be utilized in this research will mainly come from monographs and anthropologies. The methods that will lead to the conclusion will be by forming a coherent argument in relation to the evidence, documenting each source. Before finding sources and forming a structure for the research, the encyclopedia will be used to acquire background information. Thus, once the area of interest will have key factors of information, anthropologies and other sources will be used to carry out the research. The investigation will discuss the situations in Mexico, where the lowest classes were oppressed, denied liberties and exploited and how a man would soon emerge as a significant revolutionary figure in the conflict between the villagers and the haciendas (Kirkwood 63). ...read more.

Middle

The Zapatistas destroyed homes, stores, factories, hotels, and "burned nineteen wounded federal soldiers alive;" thus, Zapata could not have led a rebellion without accepting a certain amount of looting and brutality; this violence led to him having many powerful enemies (Brunk 43). Zapata was also unable to "establish and protect a strategic axis between Acapulco, the Pacific Coast, and Mexico City" (Adams 164). Francisco Madero on the other hand, followed a "more open political system" and pushed to gain "lower class support for his insurrectionary cause," offering the industrial workers the "right to organize freely and peasants the opportunity to reclaim usurped lands " (Hart 11). Madero believed in the "modernization of agricultural practices", but had no sympathy for the land distribution programs "associated with agrarian reform" (Hart 96). He also published a book La sucesi�n presidencial en 1910 offering a "legalistic" but impossible course of political action against the government (Hart 100). The book was widely read and "appealed to a cross-section of alienated groups, especially the provincial elites and the intelligentsia" (100). Madero led the anti-reelection movement, instigating the beginning of the Mexican Revolution of 1910 (Hart 103). Madero wrote the "Plan of San Luis de Potos�" which was a political document that asked the "Mexican people to rise in arms" on November, 1910, against President Diaz (Hart 125). Another revolutionary figure, Pancho Villa, was a "Mexican revolutionary general" (Miller 294). He was the "commander of the Division of the North" a "veritable caudillo of the Northern Mexican state of Chihuahua" a region which gained him much popularity (Miller 295). ...read more.

Conclusion

Conclusion It is difficult to discern one single leader who was most important to the Mexican Revolution. However, based on the evidence, Zapata intended on upholding the will of the majority, who would benefit from Zapata's vision for the future. Madero sought to fight for the elites, and Villa on the other hand was the savior of the North, where people suffered, yet were less populous than Zapata's group. Thus, Zapata deserves the title "Father of the Mexican Revolution," a man who fought till the end to attend to the impoverished people's needs and establish economic prosperity. List of Sources Adams, Jerome R. Liberators and Patriots of Latin America: Biographies of 23 Leaders. Jefforson, NC: MacFarland & Company, 1991. Brunk, Samuel. Emiliano Zapata: Revolution and Betrayal in Mexico. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico P, 1995. Burns, Bradford. Latin America: A Concise Interpretive History. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1994. Hamnett, Brian. A Concise History of Mexico. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 1999. Hart, John. Revolutionary Mexico. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press, 1997. Kirkwood, Burton. The History of Mexico. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2000. McLynn, Frank. Villa and Zapata: A History of the Mexican Revolution. New York, NY: Publishers Group West, 2001. Miller, Robert. Mexico: A History. Norman, Oklahoma: Oklahoma Press, 1989. Pinchon, Edgcumb. Zapata the Unconquerable. New York, NY: Doran and Co., 1941. Tannenbaum, Frank. Peace by Revolution: Mexico after 1910. New York, NY: Columbia UP, 1933. Womack, John. Zapata and the Mexican Revolution. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 1969. ?? ?? ?? ?? Z.Somji, 001147-081 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Schlieffen Plan - analysis of the sources

    The website is established by John Simkin and was created in 1997; however the date of the publication of the Schlieffen Plan article is not stated.

  2. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    They were convinced infrequently to advise and aid the monarchy in ruling the state. (the first National Assembly of the representatives of the three estates met in France in 1302 to aid Phillip IV The Fair against pope Boniface VIII).

  1. The Life and Policies of Brazilian President Getulio Vargas - analysis of sources.

    Also, The United States refused to give Brazil economic assistance because of them being against nationalism, even though Brazil assisted the United States in World War II, this lead Brazil to not send troops to Korea. Political Perspective Vargas rose to power through the system of patronage and clientelism as a member of the gaucho-landed oligarchy.

  2. Analyse the political causes of the Mexican Revolution of 1910

    "He got rid of the now-inconvenient issue of no re-election by having the constitution amended in 1887 and 1890 to permit his indefinite re-election; in 1904 he obtained an extension of the president's term from four to six years. Thus, Diaz, who seized power in the name of republican legality,

  1. Causes of the Mexican Revolution

    Now many of them lost their jobs and soon joined the Zapatista agrarian revolution. But the sugar debacle was only one important part of the wider crisis. Throughout the country, industrial capacity failed to expand enough to absorb peasants displaced by the changing rural economy.

  2. The North, The South, and Slavery

    Mobility within the working class 1. Opportunities for social mobility (higher and lower classes) were limited, but existed 2. Small # Workers managed to move from poverty to riches through work, ingenuity, and small% of luck 3. Many workers moved one notch up by becoming skilled and could envision children, etc.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    1916 Guchkov and young cavalry officers began to plan the disposal of Nicholas and a takeover by another Romanov. Supported by some generals but unwilling to commit themselves in advance. February Revolution 1917 What led to his downfall? 1.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Israel only started the war to gain more land - Shlaim: "The Six Day War was a defensive war. It was launched by Israel to safeguard its territory, not to expand its territory". The Six-Day War: - Israel attacks on June 5 by sending 180 aircraft to Egypt, leaving only 8 to defend Israel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work