• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

articles vs. constitution

Extracts from this document...


Articles of Confederation and Colonial Period Relationship Alice Wang IB-HOA/P-5 "A man's errors are his portals of discovery." - James Joyce The Articles of Confederation were created to satisfy the political needs after the Revolution, reflecting American distaste for the principles of British rule. It also exposes the wariness by the states of a strong central government. Colonists were afraid that their individual needs would be ignored by a national government with too much power because of past experiences from the British and the abuses that often result from such power. Thus, the Articles of Confederation were a means to solve issues colonies confronted during British rule. However, although the Articles of Confederation were an attempt to set up an effective government, it was clearly more concerned with prohibiting the government from gaining too much power than with empowering it to function effectively. When the British government had run up a huge debt from the French and Indian War, they decided to leave the financial burden to the colonies. ...read more.


During 1763 to 1776, Great Britain continued to shift their financial burden from the French and Indian War to the thirteen colonies. The Stamp Act of 1765, which taxed all legal documents, newspapers and other documents, outraged colonists and usurped the self-taxation by the thirteen colonies. The British and the colonists both did not have interest in creating a colonial delegation to Parliament. The British argued that the colonists were already represented in Parliament, basing their case on the theory of virtual representation, which stated that members of Parliament regarded the United States by the rule of mercantilism, and expected it to pay for itself. This meant that all parts of the States had to contribute revenue to the costs of running the British Empire, and also to obey certain basic rules that applied to everybody. The colonists felt that it was wrong for Parliament to impose laws and particularly taxes on them, since they were not represented in Parliament. ...read more.


Thus, they advocated to the State senate to halt foreclosure of mortgages and issue paper money as a result of high land taxes. Shay's Rebellion showed emphasized the weakness of the Articles of Confederation and that the states were too democratic in nature. It also showed how the national government needed to take charge and be granted more power in order to take better care of their people. Although the Articles of Confederation was an effort to meet the political needs after the Revolution, there were many problems with the constitution. State and federal relationships and tax problems were unsuccessfully tackled during British rule and Articles of Confederation period mainly due to the lack of a central government. The States based their fear of a national government with too much power to the formation of a constitution, leading to problematic situations such as Shay's Rebellion. However, the mistakes created through both the Colonial Era and Articles of Confederation time period left behind lessons that helped form a strong, effective government in the future, and essentially portals of discovery. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Free essay

    Articles vs Colonial

    Congress held all the central government's central power. The States were sovereign under the Articles while the national government had no real control over the States or over the citizens because of past troubled experiences under a monarch rule. It did not give the national government the power to tax,

  2. Articles of Confederation Essay

    First, the colonist disputed with the French about the ownership of the Appalachian Mountains; the disagreement led to a costly war. Soon after, the colonist and the British fought over the same territory and that led to a war. The Articles of Confederation prevented past mistakes from re-occurring and halted a potential civil war.

  1. American Anti-Imperialism vs. Imperialism

    They were worried about its traditions, destiny, security, domestic and foreign policies. They were not preoccupied with Philippines, Hawaii, Cuba or Puerto Rico. Though they defended the liberties and rights of the colonial people, their primary concern was the United States.

  2. Historical Investigation: 1988 Brazilian Constitution

    This caused conflict over whether the next president should be Neves' vice president, Jose Sarney, who backed the 1964 coup and opposed any amendment that generated a direct presidential election, or Ulysses Guimaraes, a supporter of direct presidential election, and one who was a strong advocate for the end of military rule.

  1. u.s. constitution

    This amendment states that a grand jury is needed to determine if there is enough evidence to execute a trial, a person may not be tried for the same offense twice, and a defendant has a right not to incriminate him or herself.

  2. Impact of Castro's Rule

    most give birth to the child in order to gain financial aid or to stay accountable to religious beliefs. Abortion has been the main form of contraception for the women. Simple divorce, as stated, has also become more apparent since Castro's role as leader.

  1. Constitution and New Government

    Larger influence to richer and more populous states iii. Bicameral legislature 1. Lower house by population 2. Upper house elected by Lower House a. Some get no voice at all in Upper House b. Opposition from Delaware, NJ and other small states c. William Patterson (NJ Plan) i. Federal government as opposed to national ii.

  2. Inter National Relations

    Firstly taking this issue from a Realist's stand point one the first level of analysis, one can argue that this entire issue, cannot be resolved in any matter simply because the people's hatred and animosity towards one another is so strong and powerful that the people don't want to cooperate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work