• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II?s reforms Alexander II of Russia (1855-1881), also known as the Tsar Liberator, was well prepared to take over Nicholas I of Russia?s reign; Lionel Kochan said the he was, ?the best prepared heir the Russian throne ever had.? Alexander II was faced with a Russia which was seen by many as a hopelessly backward nation. He could see there was a crucial need for restructuring, or perestroika, as it has been referred to in more modern times. His reforms included: serfdom, local government, law, censorship, and the army. The most famous of Alexander II?s reform is The Emancipation of Serfdom. Alexander II shared the same conviction as his father that American slavery was inhumane; Serfdom in Russia was compared to American slavery. The relationship between lord and serf was, in fact, a little different. It was because the serf lived and worked on the lord?s land that he was bound to the lord. The Crimean War initially started off the reform of serfdom. Russia suffered a heavy defeat, probably due to low morale in the Russian army, the majority of which were serfs; it had failed to provide the calibre of soldier Russia needed. In order to restore peace at home and be honoured abroad, the emancipation of serfdom was a vital first step. ...read more.


A zemstvo was set up in every district and province. These new democratic zemstva dealt with issues of: public health, prisons, roads, agriculture, the relief of famine and some areas of education. Furthermore, the zemstva were vital for society to function because the land owners are now not responsible for the peasantry?s needs. The idea of the zemstva soon extended to urban areas where they were called dumy, duma singular. The zemstva and dumy gave Russia a proper local government system. It also gave them a representative political system. This is a western idea going against the traditional autocratic rule, which was used in Russia. The zemstva and dumy were often criticised for their inadequacies when compared to western administrative systems. But it is development to a more democratic society. It is Russia becoming more western. Although this new system of local government is more democratic, there was still an imbalance. The gentry had 42 per cent of seats in the uezd, district zemstva, and 72 per cent of seats in the guberniya, provincial zemstva. The relative proportions for the peasantry were 38 per cent and 10.5 per cent. Before the reforms, the peasantry?s chances of justice were very little. They were guilty until proven innocent. In courts, there were no juries and the judge often only examined written evidence. ...read more.


These reforms were applicable to everyone, regardless of social standing, according in the new statue on recruitment in 1874. Miliutin?s other reforms included: dividing the empire into 15 military districts to make mobilisation easier; modernise Russia?s military training establishment; and general education for officers was made the first objective over pure military training. Miliutin?s made the army look more attractive to citizens. It was now not seen as a life sentence to servitude. People now expected to return to their town or village, and would be better equipped to run daily life and contribute to their community. Morale was boosted. But, in the army, there was no class system in place, everyone was equal. This meant that they started to feel equal to one another and create hostility towards Russia?s social system thus sparking revolutionary actions; Greater social equality was encouraged within the military. However, with equality, the army would strengthen as a unit because people would be inclined to work with each other. All of Alexander II?s reforms had one motive: to regain Russia?s dominance in the global society. Alexander II wanted Russia to compete with the west and this shows in his reforms. There were strengths and weaknesses to his reforms because he wanted to maintain an autocratic rule but to be on par with the west he would have to liberalise. Alexander II was thinking what is best for Russia?s place in the world than for Russia?s people. Alexander II made Russia look western whilst trying to maintain Slavic culture. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the Policies of Alexander II and Alexander III

    3 star(s)

    Therefore, not only language, but almost all ethnic minorities at a whole were discriminated, such as Jews, Ukrainians, Polish and Belarusians. For example, Alexander III was infamous for his anti-Semitic policies such as restriction of what occupations the Jews could work in and their settlement in "posh" areas.

  2. To what extent did Alexander II succeed reforming Russian life and institutions?

    However this new reform was far from perfect. Peasants were excluded from the new system and had to be content with justice dispensed by the local courts and government-appointed justices of the peace. Furthermore, later in his reign, political trials tested the new system, which suffered from new restrictions.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    This gave more influence to the reformers like Dmitri Milyutin. After the humiliation in the Crimean War, modernizing the state of the army was very crucial. The minister of defense, Dmitri Milyutin, was responsible for this change. Between 1833 and 1855, more than one million conscripted peasants died due to

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Pobedonostsev 1. Intolerant of other religions and nationalities, parliamentary government ?great lie of our time.? Liberals were a threat to tsarist authority, repressive police state. Main features of ?counter-reform? 1881-1885 1. Began reign by publically hanging the 5 People?s Will who assassinated his father.

  1. In what ways, and with what success, did Alex II attempt to modernise Russia ...

    It was also employed to attempt to break down the division between classes that had been caused due to the Emancipation of the Serfs reform. Modifications to the time of mandatory service was also modified to ensure a more punctual military group.

  2. Why did Alexander II introduce a program of reforms at the beginning of the ...

    He clearly stated that the serfs would now be free citizens in Russia. What he did not plan well was the fact that the now newly-peasants did not have the money to pay lands from their landlords. So the Tsar was asking people that had lived, cultivated and grew on

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander IIs reforms.

    However, there was some good out of the reform, as the initial peasant unrest died down within two years, increasing the country?s economic gain. In the long term this reform initiated further reforms between serf-noble relationships, and the conservative regime could be persuaded to make major reforms.

  2. To what extent can Alexander II be called a liberator

    They were in right to married who ever they wanted, travel, have a legal status and to own a property and a business. They where also allowed to buy land from the landowners. It was the end of feudal dues and payments; some peasant had more land holding, as well

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work