• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II?s reforms Alexander II of Russia (1855-1881), also known as the Tsar Liberator, was well prepared to take over Nicholas I of Russia?s reign; Lionel Kochan said the he was, ?the best prepared heir the Russian throne ever had.? Alexander II was faced with a Russia which was seen by many as a hopelessly backward nation. He could see there was a crucial need for restructuring, or perestroika, as it has been referred to in more modern times. His reforms included: serfdom, local government, law, censorship, and the army. The most famous of Alexander II?s reform is The Emancipation of Serfdom. Alexander II shared the same conviction as his father that American slavery was inhumane; Serfdom in Russia was compared to American slavery. The relationship between lord and serf was, in fact, a little different. It was because the serf lived and worked on the lord?s land that he was bound to the lord. The Crimean War initially started off the reform of serfdom. Russia suffered a heavy defeat, probably due to low morale in the Russian army, the majority of which were serfs; it had failed to provide the calibre of soldier Russia needed. In order to restore peace at home and be honoured abroad, the emancipation of serfdom was a vital first step. ...read more.

Middle

A zemstvo was set up in every district and province. These new democratic zemstva dealt with issues of: public health, prisons, roads, agriculture, the relief of famine and some areas of education. Furthermore, the zemstva were vital for society to function because the land owners are now not responsible for the peasantry?s needs. The idea of the zemstva soon extended to urban areas where they were called dumy, duma singular. The zemstva and dumy gave Russia a proper local government system. It also gave them a representative political system. This is a western idea going against the traditional autocratic rule, which was used in Russia. The zemstva and dumy were often criticised for their inadequacies when compared to western administrative systems. But it is development to a more democratic society. It is Russia becoming more western. Although this new system of local government is more democratic, there was still an imbalance. The gentry had 42 per cent of seats in the uezd, district zemstva, and 72 per cent of seats in the guberniya, provincial zemstva. The relative proportions for the peasantry were 38 per cent and 10.5 per cent. Before the reforms, the peasantry?s chances of justice were very little. They were guilty until proven innocent. In courts, there were no juries and the judge often only examined written evidence. ...read more.

Conclusion

These reforms were applicable to everyone, regardless of social standing, according in the new statue on recruitment in 1874. Miliutin?s other reforms included: dividing the empire into 15 military districts to make mobilisation easier; modernise Russia?s military training establishment; and general education for officers was made the first objective over pure military training. Miliutin?s made the army look more attractive to citizens. It was now not seen as a life sentence to servitude. People now expected to return to their town or village, and would be better equipped to run daily life and contribute to their community. Morale was boosted. But, in the army, there was no class system in place, everyone was equal. This meant that they started to feel equal to one another and create hostility towards Russia?s social system thus sparking revolutionary actions; Greater social equality was encouraged within the military. However, with equality, the army would strengthen as a unit because people would be inclined to work with each other. All of Alexander II?s reforms had one motive: to regain Russia?s dominance in the global society. Alexander II wanted Russia to compete with the west and this shows in his reforms. There were strengths and weaknesses to his reforms because he wanted to maintain an autocratic rule but to be on par with the west he would have to liberalise. Alexander II was thinking what is best for Russia?s place in the world than for Russia?s people. Alexander II made Russia look western whilst trying to maintain Slavic culture. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Compare and Contract the policies of Alexander II and Alexander III in Russia?

    became more frequent with the government actively encouraging murderers. Economically, Alexander II attempted to improve the auditing of accounts and the collection of revenue but there was no real tax reform. Russia's currency, the rouble, was not stabilised and a third of government expenditure went to repay old debts.

  2. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    The Anglo-German Naval Convention (June 1935) - Britain angered France and Italy by signing the Anglo-German Naval Convention in June 1935, allowing Germany to have a navy with a tonnage of 35% that of Britain's. Effectively, Britain was unilaterally sanctioning a breach of the military restrictions laid down by

  1. The emancipation of the serfs in Russia was the only genuine reform introduced by ...

    The long-time reform seemed unsuccessful, especially for the village-people. The one visible strength of Alexander II in the whole serfs emancipation was the fact that he managed to avoid gentry's rebels, not like in case of peasants who wanted more rights.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Preserved peace throughout his reign except for minor fighting in Central Asia) but laid the foundations for the 1917 revolution. Central government and internal security Feature 1. 1881 defeat of proposals for constitutional reform after conferences Effects 1. Indication that he had no intention of completing Alexander II?s reforms 2.

  1. To what extent did the reforms of Alexander II achieve his aims

    This was seen as unfair to many peasants. They believed that, because they had worked the land for such long time, it should now belong entirely to them without paying any redemption taxes. This led to many peasant uprisings such as Bezdna Unrest in 1861.

  2. In what ways, and with what success, did Alex II attempt to modernise Russia ...

    Alex II?s solution to this was to change the conscription age to 20 years of age and above regardless of one?s class. This was done for two major reasons; primarily, it meant that the Russian Army was of a fit and healthy fighting age.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - On 17th January 1988 Israel adopted the 'iron fist' policy with Rabin announcing 'the first priority is to use might, power and beatings to restore order.' This did not work and attracted much condemnation. - 'Shamir Plan' was the next step and was a diplomatic response.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander IIs reforms.

    However, there was some good out of the reform, as the initial peasant unrest died down within two years, increasing the country?s economic gain. In the long term this reform initiated further reforms between serf-noble relationships, and the conservative regime could be persuaded to make major reforms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work