• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the success and failures of the British mandates in Palestine

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐JULIANA GALLO Assess the success and failures of the British mandates in Palestine. Britain was a huge empire, one of the biggest in deed. It started approximately in the early 16th century (British Empire, 2012), up until after the Second World War, when they granted independence to most of their colonies all around the world. The mandates imposed in Palestine weren?t an exception to this, but Palestine was a peculiar case. The mandates started the in early1916, and ended the 14th of May 1948. Within this period of time there were many significant events for both the people in the Middle East, and the British Empire. There where some successes and some failures from the British Empire?s side. British power in Palestine was granted when Sharif Hussein accepted the deal in early 1916. The British High Commissioner in Cairo, Egypt, Sir Henry McMahon, proposed this deal through letters all along mid 1915 up until mid 1916. In this letters he proposed that if they allied to the triple entente, France, Britain and Russia, during the First World War. They promised to grant them their independence from the Ottoman Empire, which had allied previously with the triple alliance, Germany, Italy and Austria ? Hungary. When Hussein agreed to this, he thought that the land, which was being promised to them, was what later became Syria and Lebanon. What he didn?t know was that there was a controversial exclusion of territory, which obviously included Palestine. ...read more.


This mandate method supported the self-determination of colonies, but it also supported the French and Britain control over the Middle East. In 1922 they where approved by the League of Nations. Right from the start of the mandates, British had deceived their word, when having the misunderstanding with Hussein. There were a lot of inconvenient because as British had promised Hussein some land, it had also made an agreement, Sykes ? Picot, with France promising Arab land as well. And now with the Balfour declaration it was completely confusing for the Arab Palestinian on which side they where. This caused some violent disturbance within 1920 and 1921. So Britain decided to take action and write a White Paper, created by Winston Churchill, who as the Secretary of State for the Colonies, tried to clear out any doubts caused by the controversy between the Balfour Declaration, their promises to Hussein and their agreement with France. Churchill wrote the White Paper on the 3rd of July 1922, in which he stated that British supported the Jewish having an established piece of land in Palestine, like they had said in the Balfour declaration and then supported in the San Remo conference in April of 1920, and in the Treaty of Sevres. But this didn?t mean that all the Palestinian land was promised to the Zionists, which was how the Jewish had interpreted it. ...read more.


The 14th of May 1948, the British finally gave up on the mandates and resigned the to the UNSCOP, United Nations Special Commission on Palestine. In conclusion the British mandates in Palestine where more a failure than a success. Although the British intentions were good the positive outcomes of the mandates were outweighed by the negative outcomes. There were other factors apart form British intentions that played a part in the mandates result. Britain as an empire had many self-interests, many of the things they did in Palestine, such as getting involved with Arab territory in the first place, was for self-interest and self-benefit. They offered their help to the Arabs because it was beneficial for them. If a non?biased organization had dealt with this territory, many of the clashes that occurred and still today, 50 years later, occur between these two communities wouldn?t have happened in the first place. Britain is not to be blamed for the consequences that these communities are still dealing with today. When the mandates where passed on to the United Nations, they resigned after a while as well, because there was too much tension and resentment between them, and this is the exact reason why Britain is not to be blamed for its failure, because no matter what or who dealt with these territories, there would have still been a big issue between them. They wanted the exact same piece of territory, so there was nothing to do. You can see the effects still today, almost 50 years after the initial clashes there is still problematic between this two countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. French Revolution: Success or Failure?

    to follow the rules and standards which were more scientifically accurate and easier to use, the new definition for a meter be equal to 1 10 millionth (1/10,000,000) of the distance between the North Pole and the Equator, and this was accepted by the National Assembly in 1791.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Democratic Successes and Failures of Andrew Jackson and Nelson Mandela

    Jackson asked Congress to pass a "Force Bill" explicitly authorizing the use of military force to enforce the tariff, but the bill was reduced to a compromise tariff which diffused tensions among the States. Although Jackson reduced friction among the States, the nullification incident was a precursor of the positions that would lead to the Civil War.

  1. To what extent was the failure of the British Mandate for Palestine attributable to ...

    Then the Arabs realize that the British was trying to create a colonialists Jewish state out of Palestine as a whole, most of the Arabs would be excluded. The British were lack of direction, there many white papers made, and they just keep changing the rules.

  2. Israeli- Palestinian Conflict. I chose this topic due to my personal connection with ...

    Following extreme Islamic ideology, these terrorist groups are militant anti-peace process organizations fighting to completely eradicate the Israeli State and establish an independent Palestinian nation. Hamas specifically, has been responsible for the majority of terrorist attacks that have occurred since the signing of the Declaration of Principles on September 13, 19938.

  1. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    * Thus President Hindenburg appointed Hitler as chancellor in January 1933 and within months Hitler had established a single party state and, by 1935, was rapidly rearming Germany. * Under Hitler, Germany quickly revived as the most powerful industrial and military power in Europe; with an aggressive dictator in charge,

  2. British Foreign Policy Failures in the Palestine Mandate

    2 * The Arab Rebellion, Jewish Terrorism, and constant violence led to the 1937 Peel Commission Report and that also turned to be a failure and worsened the anger and hatred between the two groups further fueled by the 1939 MacDonald White Paper granting immigration to Jews but renewable only with Arab consent.

  1. The North, The South, and Slavery

    NW- self-consciously conservative/democratic i. Capitalistic, property conscious, middle-class ii. Abraham Lincoln- IL Whig- voiced opinions of that section XII. The Expanding South a. S fanned out into SW and established new communities, states, and markets b. Agricultural economy grew productive and prosperous c. Trade in sugar, rice, tobacco, and **cotton** made S a major force in international commerce and created substantial region wealth d.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    because it did not state that Israel should return 'the' or 'all' the territories. He said that the WB had never been 'acquired' because it has always been a part of Israel. He wanted to annex the WB. - Shamir's government also stated that it would not trade land for peace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work