• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the successes and failures of Nicholas II between 1849 and 1917:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the successes and failures of Nicholas II between 1849 and 1917: During the reign of Nicholas the second numerous events affected Russia making the ruling of an already demanding and vast country even more difficult, and given the Tsar's incapacity to rule, the Russian empire was not it it's greatest condition. The main events taking place between 1894 and 1917 were the Russo- Japanese war, the 1905 revolution, the creation of the October manifesto, the reforms created by Stolypin, the industrial issues, the involvement in the first world war and the role Rasputin acquired until his abdication in 1917. All of these events put light on Nicholas' capability of taking decisions giving hindsight on his successes and failures. Russia's desire to possess an 'ice-free' port capable of being active all year round pushed the Tsar to move towards the Japanese coast, precisely, towards the Liaotung Peninsula which was conquered by the Japanese in 1895, shortly after such date Russia, together with Germany and France took the decision of forcing Japan to return such favorable peninsula to China. In 1898, Russia took control of the peninsula gaining resources, territory and Port Arthur. ...read more.

Middle

However, such reforms gave too little to the people which were still expressing huge discontent towards the government, furthermore, these reforms were made in a bad time frame as the revolution was already too close. The industrial situation during the early 1900s was on the verge of collapsing given the inflation and the social discontent, peasants and the main opposition parties began a wave of strikes, demonstrations and protests which led the ministers of the Tsar to fear an upcoming revolution, while Nicholas II had no initiative to prevent such event from occurring. Russia's involvement in WWI resulted in the opposite of what the Tsar expected; by going to fight on the front, Nicholas II hoped to enhance the people's support towards him and create a sense of patriotism which was with no doubt lacking from the Russian people. He hoped that such predicted support and trust towards himself would be enough to motivate Russian soldiers and win the war, but given his military inexperience his strategy resulted in a complete failure on all fronts. While the main ruler of the country had set off to war, Russia was ruled by the Tsarina who was heavily influenced by Rasputin. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another individual who played a relevant role in the ruling of Russia was the Tsarina, she believed in the ideologies of autocracy, she in fact pushed the Tsar to refuse political reforms like Witte's. The period which best demonstrates her incapability to rule a country is WWI, during which she was put in charge of domestic policy. The Tsarina didn't handle her task well: she dismissed ministers and supported Rasputin as her advisor who, as I previously stated, was even less capable of making the right decisions. Based on the results of Nichoas II's actions towards the Russian empire, it is safe to say that, overall, he failed as a ruler. He showed no capacity of understanding what his people wanted, and even once he did understand, he decided to refrain from assessing the situations and from improving the quality of the people's life, showing interest only for his own prosperity. The few successful changes made to Russian Empire have to be appointed to reformers like Witte, who were able to put the country back on track by putting aside the communist ideologies and acquiring the functioning capitalist attitude which was required to advance socially, economically and industrially. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Civil War was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and failures ...

    The Southern and Northern leaders were shrewd in the fact that they did not reveal the whole truth. Both sides knew that if the people knew that thousands of soldiers would be dying for slavery, the majority would not be in favor of war.

  2. FALL OF TSAR AND WWI

    The poor administration and planning of the military also revealed the tsar's incompetence as a leader. The problem of Russia's loss in the war did not merely lie in lacking war supplies, nor in the incompetency of soldiers itself.

  1. Russia 1905 revolution

    which retained the support of the nobles, the bureaucrats and the army. THE REIGN OF CZAR ALEXANDER II ( 1855-1881 ) Czar Alexander II began his reign in 1855 when Russia was defeated by Britain, France and Piedmont in the Crimean War.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Seton-Watson ?first revolutionary party in Russia? 2. Recognized the need for a strong central organization and enforced discipline within the ranks against the state machine of repression. 3. Developed a highly organized system of central and local command which included a section for prison escapes, assassination, and revenge for

  1. Assess the success and failures of the British mandates in Palestine

    Britain realized that there was nothing they could do about it. The breaking point was the attack to the King-David Hotel in July 22nd 1946, committed by Irgun, which was internationally recognized as a Jewish terrorist group. In this date they not only killed a lot of Arabs but also various British were either injured or even killed.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The Fedayeen were Arab guerrilla fighters who attacked Israeli border areas. By 1956, these attacked numbered 11,000 - Israeli reprisals were swift and brutal. In October 1953, Israeli forces led by Ariel Sharon attacked Qiba in the West Bank killing more than 50 people - In March 1954, Israeli forced

  1. To what extent did the failures of the Provisional Government cause the November 1917 ...

    As a way to protest and demanding the surrender of power to the soviets, soldiers and sailors, joined by factory workers, marched through the streets of Petrograd in July 1917, causing riots. The government used its loyal troops to put an end to these, and accused Vladimir Lenin, a Communist politician, for starting the incident[11].

  2. Evaluate the successes and failures of Castro as ruler of Cuba.

    Furthermore it led to CIA attempts to destabilize the Castro regime; they did so by assassination attempts, bombing and setting fire to sugar crop and also through operations like the 'Bay of Pigs'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work