• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the successes and failures of Nicholas II between 1849 and 1917:

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the successes and failures of Nicholas II between 1849 and 1917: During the reign of Nicholas the second numerous events affected Russia making the ruling of an already demanding and vast country even more difficult, and given the Tsar's incapacity to rule, the Russian empire was not it it's greatest condition. The main events taking place between 1894 and 1917 were the Russo- Japanese war, the 1905 revolution, the creation of the October manifesto, the reforms created by Stolypin, the industrial issues, the involvement in the first world war and the role Rasputin acquired until his abdication in 1917. All of these events put light on Nicholas' capability of taking decisions giving hindsight on his successes and failures. Russia's desire to possess an 'ice-free' port capable of being active all year round pushed the Tsar to move towards the Japanese coast, precisely, towards the Liaotung Peninsula which was conquered by the Japanese in 1895, shortly after such date Russia, together with Germany and France took the decision of forcing Japan to return such favorable peninsula to China. In 1898, Russia took control of the peninsula gaining resources, territory and Port Arthur. ...read more.

Middle

However, such reforms gave too little to the people which were still expressing huge discontent towards the government, furthermore, these reforms were made in a bad time frame as the revolution was already too close. The industrial situation during the early 1900s was on the verge of collapsing given the inflation and the social discontent, peasants and the main opposition parties began a wave of strikes, demonstrations and protests which led the ministers of the Tsar to fear an upcoming revolution, while Nicholas II had no initiative to prevent such event from occurring. Russia's involvement in WWI resulted in the opposite of what the Tsar expected; by going to fight on the front, Nicholas II hoped to enhance the people's support towards him and create a sense of patriotism which was with no doubt lacking from the Russian people. He hoped that such predicted support and trust towards himself would be enough to motivate Russian soldiers and win the war, but given his military inexperience his strategy resulted in a complete failure on all fronts. While the main ruler of the country had set off to war, Russia was ruled by the Tsarina who was heavily influenced by Rasputin. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another individual who played a relevant role in the ruling of Russia was the Tsarina, she believed in the ideologies of autocracy, she in fact pushed the Tsar to refuse political reforms like Witte's. The period which best demonstrates her incapability to rule a country is WWI, during which she was put in charge of domestic policy. The Tsarina didn't handle her task well: she dismissed ministers and supported Rasputin as her advisor who, as I previously stated, was even less capable of making the right decisions. Based on the results of Nichoas II's actions towards the Russian empire, it is safe to say that, overall, he failed as a ruler. He showed no capacity of understanding what his people wanted, and even once he did understand, he decided to refrain from assessing the situations and from improving the quality of the people's life, showing interest only for his own prosperity. The few successful changes made to Russian Empire have to be appointed to reformers like Witte, who were able to put the country back on track by putting aside the communist ideologies and acquiring the functioning capitalist attitude which was required to advance socially, economically and industrially. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The Civil War was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and failures ...

    Both leaders in the North and South were willing to make war because of their extremist beliefs about slavery. When Abraham Lincoln, won the Election of 1860, the South recognized that their control of the government was slipping away. Lincoln was firmly against the further expansion of slavery, which threatened

  2. Evaluate the successes and failures of one ruler of a single party state: Hitler's ...

    The GNP level also rose and wage levels recovered. When gearing his economy to war, Hitler had both successes and failures. Historians are divided on whether Hitler was preparing for war in the first place. R. Overy thinks that Hitler planned for total war but miscalculated that in 1939 as he invaded Poland a major war would be provoked.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    4. Support grew as discontent increased from the 1877-1878 war with Turkey. 5. ?Went to the people? in a new way by sending out revolutionaries into the villages in peasant clothes to work as doctors, teachers, or skilled workmen and organize them to resist tsarist officials and landlords.

  2. To what extent did the failures of the Provisional Government cause the November 1917 ...

    In addition, discipline in factories continued being harsh, working hours were not reduced, and living standards and unemployment kept worsening. This shows the working classes did not see improvements of any kind during the Provisional Government rule. Last but not least, immigrants, who longed for greater self-rule and participation as workers and peasants, did not get any of this.

  1. Evaluate the successes and failures of Castro as ruler of Cuba.

    and this really made a mark on the world stage. Also Castro was even prepared to put more importance on his role as a revolutionary than re-establishing relations with USA (which might have helped the Cuban economy) when he insisted on sending support to the revolutionary fighters in Angola in 1975.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    Before 1861, serfs were drafted by their owners for 25 years; morale in the military would have been low. Also, a reform to the military?s recruitment system was vital as serfdom was abolished in 1861. During the period 1862 to 1874, Miliutin introduced military reforms based on the Prussian model.

  1. History and Philosophy of Ukraine

    that man is a microcosm. What exactly is meant by the term Ukrainian "philosophy of the heart''? Firstly, it depends on such features of the Ukrainian national character, as emotionality - providing high-value sense, a special kind of vision of nature, specific humor.

  2. Assess the success and failures of the British mandates in Palestine

    This report stated that the best possible solution was the one state solution. In this report there was also a restriction imposed for the Jewish immigration, only 700,000 Jews a year could come into Palestine in a range of five years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work