• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bolsheviks in Power Essay

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Omar Al-Ayoub Block 3 December 17, 2009 IB HL History Year 2 The years of 1917 to 1953 marked the Bolshevik era of Russia. In this period, Russia was to go through drastic political, social, and economic change, under the rule of two political figures, Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin. In its pre-Revolutionary years, Russia had been in evident economic desperation and political instability, appearing as a backwards nation in the midst of an advancing western Europe. Lenin and Stalin, both brought apparent accomplishments to Russian society in their years of rule, in which Russia, as a country, grew out of the incapacities that had until then diminished it's status. Yet, examining the essence of Bolshevik power in Russia, it becomes clear that in establishing evident economic and political advancement, other aspects of society were totally neglected. Lenin and Stalin led Russia, on a social level, through a harsh era that primarily exploited the Russian people as a whole. Indeed the Bolsheviks seemed to diverge immensely from the fundamentals of communism, and though claimed to work in benefit of the people, ended up destroying them. Lenin and Stalin were mainly concerned with the establishment of their dictatorship, through whatever means possible needed to eliminate opposition. Thus, although successful strictly in the sense of Russian industrialization and political stability relative to its state before these two figures, the Bolsheviks led the Russian people into wretched lifestyles that were not resolved during the regime. In other words, what was accomplished by Lenin and Stalin appears minimal compared to the humanitarian at which done. Leninism gave way to Stalinism, and Russia was bound to follow the absolutism of their policies for fifty years of an unreliable government. After the abdication of the tsar in March 1917, the Provisional Government, made up of the Duma and the Petrograd Soviet took control of the Russian government. Though the tsarist regime had been eradicated, the same problems remained in Russian Society: economic failure, famine, political unrest, and a government incapable of dealing with such issues. ...read more.

Middle

It has been argued, that the NEP would not have managed to sustain consistent economic growth after 1924 and perhaps caused a state of economic stagnation, "On the other hand, we do not believe that NEP was capable of sustaining much higher rates of industrialization than those achieved on the eve of the first world war." ( Davies) Perhaps the most backwards feature of Lenin's regime was his failure to execute the concepts of socialism. Lenin established a dictatorship in Russia that therefore did not release it from the 'absolute power' that it had manifested during the revolutions. While the Soviet regime initially claimed to be based on the principles of Karl Marx, dictatorial regime was clearly not approved by Marxist ideology. In fact the NEP diverged totally from the essence of socialism, and did not even come close to providing the Russian people with their hopes of a utopian communist state. As Karl Marx called for the elimination of the state and the rise of the proletariat, Russia's government set up in it's Bolshevik years seemed to have only secured the control of the state and enhanced the oppression upon the working class, "Far from 'withering away' as Marx had envisaged, the state had become all-powerful. Lenin had replaced one dictatorship with another." (Tarr, 36) It seemed that Russia was living a 'modern-past' in which the ruler had changed, but concepts had not. The establishment of the socialist state, at least under Lenin, possibly served as a veil to cover the true motivations of lust for power. The aims of Communism appeared to fail under Lenin, for the aim to eliminate class struggle, only furthered its existence. Politics and economics set aside, Lenin's regime was essentially socially detrimental to the Russian people. Lenin's struggle to fight opposition was to mark the beginning of a violent and bloody era in Russian history that would then be continued under Stalin. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, anybody who seemed at the least suspicious of even questioning Stalin's policies was quickly executed, or sent to the Gulag, the concentration camps in which people were killed and tortured. By the end of Stalin's regime, millions of people had died without any justification, "Ninety-nine per cent of Stalin's victim's, however, were innocent of any opposition to the Soviet system and were actually loyal Soviet citizens." (Lee, 54.) Stalin also carried show trials, in which is publicly accused innocent people, to settle terrorizing atmosphere that would further ensure the absence of mere opposition, The show trials dealt with these potential threats by magnifying the charge against them. They had to die as traitors, as perpetrators of crimes beyond the reach of reason...Only then could Stalin be sure that their execution would provoke no dangerous revulsion. (Lee, 55.) Stalin's purges represented a severe morale assault that would haunt Russian people for even after the end of his rule. In effect, the final result of Stalin's regime was a deteriorated and terrorized nation that had suffered from the failure and obsession to create a socialist dictatorship. . In conclusion, it is clear that the accomplishments brought out by Lenin and Stalin were only superficial, and did not benefit Russia in the long-run. True, both of them contributed to saving the country from its shaming backwardness, and put it at the same level as the developing countries of Western Europe, but the destructive cost at which this was achieved, was highly more significant. Stalin's era is often regarded as a homicide of innocent civilians who found themselves faced to a tyrannical government that completely neglected the life of the conditions of their lives. At the end, Russia was a world power, but that had been through tremendous, and unforgettable sufferance. Whilst the tsarist revolution had awoken hope in the minds of the Russians, the Bolsheviks came with an objective strictly reserved to power, bringing Russia not very far from the state it was before the revolutions hit. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do Trotsky(TM)s own misjudgments account for his failure in the power struggle ...

    4 star(s)

    In Trotsky's autobiography, My Life, he states, "I was told: 'The funeral will be on Saturday, you can't get back in time, and so we advise you to continue your treatment.' Accordingly, I had no choice. As a matter of fact, the funeral did not take place until Sunday, and I could easily have reached Moscow by then...

  2. Analyse the short and long term causes of the 1917 Feb/March Russian Revolution

    This has a very huge factor in the trigger of the Russian Revolution, as the very first events of the revolution; February 22nd, there was a strike at the Putilov engineering works in Petrograd. Workers demanded pay rises and the re-employment of some sacked workers.

  1. Was Lenin a success or a failure to Russia?

    The Civil War broke out in the same year as the opponents of Bolsheviks united with a single common goal - to remove the Reds. And although the Reds were surrounded (since they controlled only Moscow, Petrograd and the territory that lay between), they managed to defend themselves as the

  2. To what extent should the success of Stalin in the leadership struggle between 1924-1930 ...

    However it has some limitations - for example, Trotsky's writing is heavily biased against Stalin which may have created elaborations and mistruths in order to sway the reader's opinion in his favour. There is also the limitation imposed by a lack of supporting evidence for many of the claims made by Trotsky in the text.

  1. To What Extent Was Stalin's Regime Based On Terror

    his industrial work, notably when building huge projects such as the Dneiper Dam, the Magnitogorsk power station or the Belomor Canal.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Inventories drawn up to identify land used by the peasants & landlords as well as feudal dues exacted. Phase 2 1863 onwards 1. Ex-serfs remained under ?temporary obligation.? 2. Communal courts replaced nobles? legal control over peasants, managed by ex-serfs and supervised by officials and a peace officer (noble).

  1. History questions on Soviet Russia and its relations with the rest of the World.

    The ?overall strategic concept? that the United States should adopt is to make courts and magistrates may be set up with sheriffs and constables, and to have the United Nations Organization begin to be equipped with an international armed force.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Following the Suez Crisis and the departure of English and French colonial influence, the US began to establish a sphere of influence in the Middle East with the original aim of surrounding the USSR with a number of states diplomatically aligned to the US.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work