• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bolsheviks In Power

Extracts from this document...


The revolution in February/March 1917, a consequence of accumulated discontent among the Russians, put an end to the Romanov dynasty that ruled the country for more than four hundred years (1613-1919) (Morris 2004, 123). Consequently, the provisional government was established as an alternative form of government in March 15, 1917 (Morris 192). Despite the establishment of a new government in Russia, the provisional government, Russia faced multiple problems that led to further discontentment, tension, and conflicts within the country. As a consequence, the Bolsheviks seized the opportunity of the situation by executing the October/November coup (revolution) in 1917 to take control of Russia (Morris 198). The Bolsheviks in power were now able to carry out their major objective of creating a communist regime in Russia. Russia, under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin 1917-1953, went under number of political, economical, and social changes. Despite some of the positive advancements and progresses made by the changes that occurred under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin, two Bolsheviks, these changes resulted into heavy humanitarian sacrifice and costs. In other words, the humanitarian costs outweigh in magnitude the success of the Bolsheviks. Thus, the Bolsheviks in power were negative force for change in Russia. Vladimir Lenin, the head of the first Soviet government until his death, brought more negative changes in Russia (Morris 194). Regardless of Lenin's attempt of bringing positive changes in Russia through the introduction of a New Constitution in 1918 to keep his promise of giving "Bread, Peace, and Land" to the Russian people, his attempts failed. ...read more.


Similarly, under the leadership of Stalin, there were many political, economical and social changes. Despite some of the positive changes brought by Stalin, Russia suffered enormous humanitarian losses; there were more negative changes in Russia. Most of Stalin's policies were directed towards Russia's economy. Stalin believed in the idea that: if agriculture was to produce more, it had to be supplied with more and better industrial goods. Yet his was bound to become more difficult as the existing industrial equipment, inherited from tsarist days, began to wear out (Van Lowe 1971, 192). Hence, Stalin saw that industrialization was the answer to Russia's future success. Therefore, Stalin introduced collectivization in order to solve the problem of Russian agriculture. Before collectivization was introduced, Russian agriculture was backward: "around half the peasants reaped the grain harvest by hand, using sickles or scythes, and threshed it with flails" (Brooman, Stalin). Clearly, the main reason for Russian agriculture backwardness was the lack of western technology. Nevertheless, Stalin put an end to the small, individual, old-fashioned farms to organize them into kolkhoz, a collective farm where all the fields, horses, tools with tractors supplied by the government would work together (Morris 229). The collectivization "was a kind of reversion to the heavy-handed tactics of War Communism" (Wood 2004, 32). It marked the end of brief decade of liberation for the Russian peasants under Lenin's New Economic Policy. Nonetheless, there was opposition in collectivizing by the peasants. The peasants were unwilling to hand in their private property to the government. As a consequence, Stalin decided to wage war against the kulaks, the rich peasants who were "standing in the way of progress" (Lowe 114). ...read more.


Russia under the leadership of Stalin made some major advancements; particularly in economy. Russia's progress and advancements were achieved by ruthless and brutal methods that entailed enormous human sacrifice. Millions of Russians lost their lives, their freedom, and their right to express their mind under the Stalinist state. It is clear that Stalin's brutal policies such as the purges ultimately weakened the country. Also, the new social and political reforms such as the Constitution of 1936 were created to consolidate Stalin's dictatorship. Despite of his successes in industrializing Russia - his fourth Five-Year Plan in 1946:"by 1950 many parts of the USSR were producing as much as in 1940. In several cases the Plan's industrial targets were exceeded" (Brooman, Stalin)., and aligning Russia with the superpower nations, Stalin restricted the lives of workers, executed and murdered millions of innocent people, and exploited the resources of the eastern European countries. All in all, Bolsheviks in power, under the rule of Lenin and Stalin from 1917 to 1953, was a negative force for change in Russia. Despite the successes of industrializing the country and eradicating the remnants of Tsarist bourgeoisie, these changes left more damage to the country than benefits. Lenin and Stalin's political, economical, and social policies left permanent damages such as the loss of millions of innocents. Ultimately, all of Lenin's and Stalin's policies that were created to bring positive changes to Russia contributed to the general drop of living standards of average Russians and resulted into enormous humanitarian losses and sacrifice. The costs of progresses and advancements made during the leadership of the two Bolsheviks, Lenin and Stalin, in Russia were far too great. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. In order to achieve and retain power a leader of a single-party state needed ...

    Most Bolsheviks and other communists had no intention of removing the provision government. o It is important to note that Lenin was able to very quickly change the minds of majority of the communists. * Those who opposed Lenin publicly were disliked by the majority of the population.

  2. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    War against Austria � Things turned out rather differently from what the two men had planned. Cavour and Napoleon III needed to provoke Austria into war. Cavour began by writing an emotional anti-Austrian speech for Victor Emmanuel to deliver at the opening of parliament in January 1859.

  1. Stalin was a necessary evil for the Soviet Union With regard to this statement ...

    However unlike collectivisation the methods appeared to benefit the economy even though Stalin set such unrealistic goals, for example his aim was to achieve a 250% increase in total industrial output and a 350% increase in the heavy industries. Historian M.Macanely states , "It was as if mathematics ceased to exist.", highlighting the extremeness of the goals set.

  2. Compare and contrast the policies of the USA and USSR towards Korea between 1945 ...

    The world responded by provided food. However the next year, the North Korean government rejected aid and has not accepted from foreign countries ever since. Whilst, South Korea has developed a high-tech economy and was amongst the few countries to escape a recession during the global financial crisis in 2009.

  1. Was there continuous economic decline in Britain from 1951 to 1990

    in the EEC but French President Charles de Gaulle's veto was a major economic setback. Finally, the Labour governments had ambitious plans to restructure the economy (Harold Wilson's "white heat of technological revolution"). However, in 1967, Britain was forced to devaluate the pound making it impossible for the government to put in place these restructuring policies.

  2. In what ways, and with what results had Stalin developed the Soviet Union into ...

    There were some negative results of Russia?s development as well, which need to be considered. Collectivization was very unpopular among the rural population of Russia, as it required many to give up their plot of land, which they spent their whole life developing in producing crops.

  1. Discuss the methods used by Hitler to Consolidate Power at 1933 1934

    They had defended his meeting, and attacked his opponents.9 By late 1933 the number of members had risen to some 2.5 million men.10 For Hitler - the SA were an embarrassment, not an advantage. Also, R�hm, the leader of the SA, was talking about a Socialist revolution and about taking over the army.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    them because the obligatory labor of free men is unthinkable?grain on the market has decreased and will decrease still more? General effects Good 1. Old abuses questioned & a more questioning attitude among nobles and peasants 2. New local government (zemstva)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work