• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bolsheviks In Power

Extracts from this document...


The revolution in February/March 1917, a consequence of accumulated discontent among the Russians, put an end to the Romanov dynasty that ruled the country for more than four hundred years (1613-1919) (Morris 2004, 123). Consequently, the provisional government was established as an alternative form of government in March 15, 1917 (Morris 192). Despite the establishment of a new government in Russia, the provisional government, Russia faced multiple problems that led to further discontentment, tension, and conflicts within the country. As a consequence, the Bolsheviks seized the opportunity of the situation by executing the October/November coup (revolution) in 1917 to take control of Russia (Morris 198). The Bolsheviks in power were now able to carry out their major objective of creating a communist regime in Russia. Russia, under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin 1917-1953, went under number of political, economical, and social changes. Despite some of the positive advancements and progresses made by the changes that occurred under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin, two Bolsheviks, these changes resulted into heavy humanitarian sacrifice and costs. In other words, the humanitarian costs outweigh in magnitude the success of the Bolsheviks. Thus, the Bolsheviks in power were negative force for change in Russia. Vladimir Lenin, the head of the first Soviet government until his death, brought more negative changes in Russia (Morris 194). Regardless of Lenin's attempt of bringing positive changes in Russia through the introduction of a New Constitution in 1918 to keep his promise of giving "Bread, Peace, and Land" to the Russian people, his attempts failed. ...read more.


Similarly, under the leadership of Stalin, there were many political, economical and social changes. Despite some of the positive changes brought by Stalin, Russia suffered enormous humanitarian losses; there were more negative changes in Russia. Most of Stalin's policies were directed towards Russia's economy. Stalin believed in the idea that: if agriculture was to produce more, it had to be supplied with more and better industrial goods. Yet his was bound to become more difficult as the existing industrial equipment, inherited from tsarist days, began to wear out (Van Lowe 1971, 192). Hence, Stalin saw that industrialization was the answer to Russia's future success. Therefore, Stalin introduced collectivization in order to solve the problem of Russian agriculture. Before collectivization was introduced, Russian agriculture was backward: "around half the peasants reaped the grain harvest by hand, using sickles or scythes, and threshed it with flails" (Brooman, Stalin). Clearly, the main reason for Russian agriculture backwardness was the lack of western technology. Nevertheless, Stalin put an end to the small, individual, old-fashioned farms to organize them into kolkhoz, a collective farm where all the fields, horses, tools with tractors supplied by the government would work together (Morris 229). The collectivization "was a kind of reversion to the heavy-handed tactics of War Communism" (Wood 2004, 32). It marked the end of brief decade of liberation for the Russian peasants under Lenin's New Economic Policy. Nonetheless, there was opposition in collectivizing by the peasants. The peasants were unwilling to hand in their private property to the government. As a consequence, Stalin decided to wage war against the kulaks, the rich peasants who were "standing in the way of progress" (Lowe 114). ...read more.


Russia under the leadership of Stalin made some major advancements; particularly in economy. Russia's progress and advancements were achieved by ruthless and brutal methods that entailed enormous human sacrifice. Millions of Russians lost their lives, their freedom, and their right to express their mind under the Stalinist state. It is clear that Stalin's brutal policies such as the purges ultimately weakened the country. Also, the new social and political reforms such as the Constitution of 1936 were created to consolidate Stalin's dictatorship. Despite of his successes in industrializing Russia - his fourth Five-Year Plan in 1946:"by 1950 many parts of the USSR were producing as much as in 1940. In several cases the Plan's industrial targets were exceeded" (Brooman, Stalin)., and aligning Russia with the superpower nations, Stalin restricted the lives of workers, executed and murdered millions of innocent people, and exploited the resources of the eastern European countries. All in all, Bolsheviks in power, under the rule of Lenin and Stalin from 1917 to 1953, was a negative force for change in Russia. Despite the successes of industrializing the country and eradicating the remnants of Tsarist bourgeoisie, these changes left more damage to the country than benefits. Lenin and Stalin's political, economical, and social policies left permanent damages such as the loss of millions of innocents. Ultimately, all of Lenin's and Stalin's policies that were created to bring positive changes to Russia contributed to the general drop of living standards of average Russians and resulted into enormous humanitarian losses and sacrifice. The costs of progresses and advancements made during the leadership of the two Bolsheviks, Lenin and Stalin, in Russia were far too great. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    He hoped to see the power of Austria reduced, to secure a revision of the 1815 settlement, ad to restore France's international prestige. He also believed that there would be popular support for Italian independence in France. A federation of Italian states with an enlarged Piedmont was an attractive proposition.

  2. Mao - his social and economic policies and his decline and re-establishment of power

    Reasons for Hundred Flowers * It is possible that Mao saw the Hundred Flowers as a form of rectification. Opening up the CCP to criticism would keep it pure and prevent it from developing into a privileged ´┐Żlite. * Indeed on one hand it is possible that Mao saw the

  1. Stalin was a necessary evil for the Soviet Union With regard to this statement ...

    Stalin's own quote justifies his actions in the purges, "Death solves all problems. No man-no problem", it shows how nothing would hold him back from eliminating all of his opposition. The purges were absolutely not a necessary evil for the Soviet Union.

  2. Stalins Purges

    direct the economy and ensure the adequate production and distribution of essential materials including the food needed to support industrial and urban growth. With government direction and control the economic resources of the Soviet Union could be maximized. Since the communist takeover in 1917, trade with the rest of the world had been severely reduced.

  1. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    Encouraged by the collapse of the Stresa Front (as a result of the Anglo-German Naval Convention and the Abyssinian Crisis) and by the international community's preoccupation with the Abyssinian crisis, he felt confident enough to remilitarise the Rhineland. This was a breach of both the Versailles Treaty and Locarno Pact

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Took longer to defeat a declining Turkey in 1877 than it should have and Russia suffered defeats in the Russo-Japanese 1905-1904 and World War One. 2. People could still be substituted and officers remained highly aristocratic. 3. Still based on peasant conscription, illiteracy reduced the effectiveness of training.

  1. Discuss the methods used by Hitler to Consolidate Power at 1933 1934

    Gregor Strasser, his rival in the 1920s, was killed. Many more were also shot for opposing Hitler in the Reichstag, such as von Streicher, or for betrayal during the Beer Hall Putsch, i.e.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The Fedayeen were Arab guerrilla fighters who attacked Israeli border areas. By 1956, these attacked numbered 11,000 - Israeli reprisals were swift and brutal. In October 1953, Israeli forces led by Ariel Sharon attacked Qiba in the West Bank killing more than 50 people - In March 1954, Israeli forced

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work