• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Bolsheviks In Power

Extracts from this document...


The revolution in February/March 1917, a consequence of accumulated discontent among the Russians, put an end to the Romanov dynasty that ruled the country for more than four hundred years (1613-1919) (Morris 2004, 123). Consequently, the provisional government was established as an alternative form of government in March 15, 1917 (Morris 192). Despite the establishment of a new government in Russia, the provisional government, Russia faced multiple problems that led to further discontentment, tension, and conflicts within the country. As a consequence, the Bolsheviks seized the opportunity of the situation by executing the October/November coup (revolution) in 1917 to take control of Russia (Morris 198). The Bolsheviks in power were now able to carry out their major objective of creating a communist regime in Russia. Russia, under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin 1917-1953, went under number of political, economical, and social changes. Despite some of the positive advancements and progresses made by the changes that occurred under the leadership of Lenin and Stalin, two Bolsheviks, these changes resulted into heavy humanitarian sacrifice and costs. In other words, the humanitarian costs outweigh in magnitude the success of the Bolsheviks. Thus, the Bolsheviks in power were negative force for change in Russia. Vladimir Lenin, the head of the first Soviet government until his death, brought more negative changes in Russia (Morris 194). Regardless of Lenin's attempt of bringing positive changes in Russia through the introduction of a New Constitution in 1918 to keep his promise of giving "Bread, Peace, and Land" to the Russian people, his attempts failed. ...read more.


Similarly, under the leadership of Stalin, there were many political, economical and social changes. Despite some of the positive changes brought by Stalin, Russia suffered enormous humanitarian losses; there were more negative changes in Russia. Most of Stalin's policies were directed towards Russia's economy. Stalin believed in the idea that: if agriculture was to produce more, it had to be supplied with more and better industrial goods. Yet his was bound to become more difficult as the existing industrial equipment, inherited from tsarist days, began to wear out (Van Lowe 1971, 192). Hence, Stalin saw that industrialization was the answer to Russia's future success. Therefore, Stalin introduced collectivization in order to solve the problem of Russian agriculture. Before collectivization was introduced, Russian agriculture was backward: "around half the peasants reaped the grain harvest by hand, using sickles or scythes, and threshed it with flails" (Brooman, Stalin). Clearly, the main reason for Russian agriculture backwardness was the lack of western technology. Nevertheless, Stalin put an end to the small, individual, old-fashioned farms to organize them into kolkhoz, a collective farm where all the fields, horses, tools with tractors supplied by the government would work together (Morris 229). The collectivization "was a kind of reversion to the heavy-handed tactics of War Communism" (Wood 2004, 32). It marked the end of brief decade of liberation for the Russian peasants under Lenin's New Economic Policy. Nonetheless, there was opposition in collectivizing by the peasants. The peasants were unwilling to hand in their private property to the government. As a consequence, Stalin decided to wage war against the kulaks, the rich peasants who were "standing in the way of progress" (Lowe 114). ...read more.


Russia under the leadership of Stalin made some major advancements; particularly in economy. Russia's progress and advancements were achieved by ruthless and brutal methods that entailed enormous human sacrifice. Millions of Russians lost their lives, their freedom, and their right to express their mind under the Stalinist state. It is clear that Stalin's brutal policies such as the purges ultimately weakened the country. Also, the new social and political reforms such as the Constitution of 1936 were created to consolidate Stalin's dictatorship. Despite of his successes in industrializing Russia - his fourth Five-Year Plan in 1946:"by 1950 many parts of the USSR were producing as much as in 1940. In several cases the Plan's industrial targets were exceeded" (Brooman, Stalin)., and aligning Russia with the superpower nations, Stalin restricted the lives of workers, executed and murdered millions of innocent people, and exploited the resources of the eastern European countries. All in all, Bolsheviks in power, under the rule of Lenin and Stalin from 1917 to 1953, was a negative force for change in Russia. Despite the successes of industrializing the country and eradicating the remnants of Tsarist bourgeoisie, these changes left more damage to the country than benefits. Lenin and Stalin's political, economical, and social policies left permanent damages such as the loss of millions of innocents. Ultimately, all of Lenin's and Stalin's policies that were created to bring positive changes to Russia contributed to the general drop of living standards of average Russians and resulted into enormous humanitarian losses and sacrifice. The costs of progresses and advancements made during the leadership of the two Bolsheviks, Lenin and Stalin, in Russia were far too great. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    Issued an ultimatum, which was rejected. � On 29 April Austria declared war on Piedmont. Few Italians outside Piedmont rallied to the cause and Piedmont could raise only 60,000 men. However, Napoleon III kept his word and declared war on Austria. Over 100,000 French troops, ineptly led by Napoleon III, crossed the Alps.

  2. To what extent is it fair to say that with the impact of the ...

    22 The troops of the newly formed Cheka23 confiscated all kinds of grocery products, which led to bloody revolts and people being even more hungry.24 By 1918 the Ckeka had assassinated more than 10 000 "counterrevolutionaries".25 It also organized public hangings.26 Labour- and concentration camps were established.27 Everyone who was

  1. Hitler vs. Stalin: Who is a more destructive leader in terms of religious groups?

    about Hitler's health problems: "One thing that became borne in on me very early was the absence of a vital factor in Hitler's existence. He had no normal sex life...It was part of hidden complexes and a constitutional insufficiency which may have been congenital and may have resulted from a syphilitic infection during his youth in Vienna."

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Officer corps was given real training and military colleges were introduced that admitted non-nobles. Promotion made more open. 3. 15 regional commands set up to improve administration. 4. Criticized serf-based conscription and aimed to create a smaller, more professional, and less expensive army 1.

  1. Discuss the methods used by Hitler to Consolidate Power at 1933 1934

    Since this would go against everything Nazism represented, the result was the Night of the Long Knives on 30th June 1934. It was carried out by members of the SS though the army provided weapons and transport.11R�hm, his lieutenant Edmund Heines and around 400 SA members were executed brutally without

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    War and Peace Causes, course and consequences of the 1967 (Six Day) War Background: - During 1966-67, military tension was high as the number of Fatah attacks increased and Israeli retaliation was quick and ruthless. Nasser was coming under increasing pressure to do something about Israel - The war was

  1. Peron's Consolidation of Power

    disposal, newspaper size was limited to a certain number of printed pages, and distribution was hindered. At the same time, Perón and his party used the chain of newspapers they owned to disseminate propaganda in quantity. Papers such as La Razón, Critica, El Mundo, and Democracia, as well as various

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    From the time of the failed Munich putsch in 1923. Hitler?s intentions were to take power legally. He wanted the position of Chancellor because that was the only position where he could make decisions that would affect the whole of Germany, and have them enhanced by the police, the army and the SA.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work