• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar Republic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question: Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the "Golden period" for the Weimar Republic? 1919, the year the revolutionaries created the Weimar Republic, a democratic regime completely against Germany's militaristic traditions. This was a year of turmoil and change. The Treaty of Versailles outraged the Germans and the new republic was seen to have betrayed its people by signing it. However, 1924-29, with a more established Weimar Republic, things began to take a course towards success but not to an extent to avoid the inevitable collapse. It was a superficially promising period, which in reality it was marred by major weaknesses. Conditions and also majorly the republic itself ensured that the so-called 'Golden period' would not last and the Germans were bound to end up under an authoritarian regime again in 1933-34. 1924-1929 was a relatively stable period for the Weimar Republic. After the signing of the Treaty of Versailles by the accused "November criminals" i.e. The Weimar government, Germany saw a lot of attempted coups and revolutions, some major ones being the Kapp Putsch and the Munich Putsch of 1923. These were successfully suppressed by the government and entering 1924 one could see a large reduction in the attempts to overthrow the government. This is on account of the newly established constitution. The constitution allowed small parties to be elected into the republic, not just individual representatives, as the party decided these deputies internally [depending on the number of votes casted in favour of them]. ...read more.

Middle

To begin with, there was the constitution. Firstly, the proportion of representation from each party was so little that it was impossible for one party to come to power thus creating confusion and delays in decreeing laws due to the diversity in views. This disorganisation led to there being 6 different Chancellors during the period of 1924-28, each pertaining their own different ideologies in terms of law and order. Along with a Chancellor the Weimar Republic had a President. Article 48 allowed the President immense power to govern creating an almost dictatorial regime. If the President was not pleased the Chancellor, he had the power to remove him from position and appoint someone of his wishes. This meant that the government was restricted to the President's ideologies, which further restricted free will and democracy, for example, Hindenburg, who was appointed as President in 1925, was a strict conservative rightist and therefore Germany remained mostly a strict rightist country under his power. In 1930 Hindenburg appointed Bruning as chancellor and agreed to sign 'presidential emergency decrees' under Article 48 if the government faced opposition in the Reichstag. Therefore, under Hindenburg's governing and Bruning's chancellorship the government no longer functioned democratically as Bruning relied on the president's emergency powers to push through the legislation he desired. Hindenburg's policies were collapsing the German democracy as he represented an abuse of the constitution's emergency powers, which were initially meant to protect the democratic functioning of the constitution, not to disrupt it. Moreover, Hindenburg's failing energy and senility (he was 85 when he got re-elected in 1932) ...read more.

Conclusion

* American influence -technology * Weimar culture o Art- Dadaism. Ex, George Grosz o Architecture. Ex, Walter Gropius o Philosophy. Ex, Thomas Mann o Cinema. Ex, Fritz Lang No: Political disillusionment in Germany: * Extremist parties still making an impact on the street. Fighting between Nazi/SA and KPD/paramilitary Red fighting league. Friekorps. Deaths-riots * Liberal party DDP-Lost ground therefore, M/C became polarised * Late 1920's Centre Party move to the Right and some of its leaders like Bruning began to favour authoritarianism. * 6 Weimar govt. between 1924-29= increases instability * PR system: instead of co-operating, parties stuck by their political ideology. Therefore, no chancellor could hold a govt. together for more than 2 years. * Pubic unhappy with PR system because voters were voting for the party rather than the individual deputy. * Parties divided. Even the SPD was not in agreement. * Growth of narrow sectional interest parties. Gained a total of 78 deputies at their peak in 1930. Advocated narrow interests e.g. compensation from the losers of hyperinflation. * Lacked a charismatic leader. People still believed in the "stab in the back" ideology. * Hindenberg appointed President in 1925. Conservative Right. * Elite still opposed to democracy e.g. Army, Church and teachers. * Instable govt. too many political parties and the need to form coalitions which proved short-lived- electoral system. * Extremists parties irreconcilable divisions. * Dependant on foreign economies- in-flow from USA * Comprehensive unemployment insurance of 1927 * Agricultural priced decreases - 1927 * November criminals Historiography ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Why was the Weimar Republic so short-lived?

    The Spartacists3 believed that Germany's revolution should be similar to that of communist Russia. Even though the attempted uprising (led by Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht in 1919) was quickly crushed by the Freikorps4, it was hard for the government to dissolve the idea of a rebellion from the minds

  2. He brought his country and his people nothing but harm. To what extent do ...

    endure further hardship? according to Service; this was a move Russia needed in order for her backward predominantly agricultural nation to catch up with the west. Yet although Stalin did partially achieve something beneficial for the Russian economy, he did so using a completely ill-suited policy that caused far more

  1. To what extent were economic conditions the predominant factor in the proliferation and manifestation ...

    any assurances in regard to parliamentary sovereignty or national unity, ensuring that their own power seized to be mitigated to any degree. As a result it appears evident that the revolution of 1848, though failing to realize the ultimate ambition of constituting a unified, democratic German state resulting in the

  2. Law and Order in the Medieval Period Assigment - Year 8

    This was in place as they believed that god would decide if the were guilty or not. Nobleman Trial by Ordeal If you were a nobleman you could prove your innocence in a trial by an ordeal fight. The nobleman would be able to hire a person to fight for him.

  1. A look at the Differing Views of Jimmy Hoffa by the Government, the Public, ...

    he felt he was above the law also contributed to the government?s view of Hoffa as evil. The government?s fear of Hoffa seems to be the biggest contributing factor to their perception of him. ________________ Jimmy Hoffa as Seen by the Public Before Jimmy Hoffa began being investigated by the government, he was relatively unknown to people outside the Teamsters.

  2. To what extent did the previous French occupation of Lebanon influence religious and ethnic ...

    about it firsthand and can be one of the few sources that clearly explains the causes of the Civil War. This section provides statistical evidence of the various ethnic and religious groups? population that were residing in Lebanon before, during, and after the war.

  1. He brought his country and his people nothing but harm. To what extent do ...

    The majority of peasants ate their seed corn and slaughtered their livestock. The Soviet authorities responded by fierce coercion, but this simply made matter worse as it could not replenish the barns and restock the herds.

  2. A period of economic and political stagnation. How valid is this assessment of the ...

    Further to this, he reverted to the Stalinist title of General Secretary of the Party rather than Khrushchev?s First Secretary, and the presidium once again became the politburo. He believed the cadres in state organisations should be permanent appointments, yet at the same time knew how to manipulate the party

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work