• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the Golden period for the Weimar Republic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question: Can the period between 1924-1929 really be called the "Golden period" for the Weimar Republic? 1919, the year the revolutionaries created the Weimar Republic, a democratic regime completely against Germany's militaristic traditions. This was a year of turmoil and change. The Treaty of Versailles outraged the Germans and the new republic was seen to have betrayed its people by signing it. However, 1924-29, with a more established Weimar Republic, things began to take a course towards success but not to an extent to avoid the inevitable collapse. It was a superficially promising period, which in reality it was marred by major weaknesses. Conditions and also majorly the republic itself ensured that the so-called 'Golden period' would not last and the Germans were bound to end up under an authoritarian regime again in 1933-34. 1924-1929 was a relatively stable period for the Weimar Republic. After the signing of the Treaty of Versailles by the accused "November criminals" i.e. The Weimar government, Germany saw a lot of attempted coups and revolutions, some major ones being the Kapp Putsch and the Munich Putsch of 1923. These were successfully suppressed by the government and entering 1924 one could see a large reduction in the attempts to overthrow the government. This is on account of the newly established constitution. The constitution allowed small parties to be elected into the republic, not just individual representatives, as the party decided these deputies internally [depending on the number of votes casted in favour of them]. ...read more.

Middle

To begin with, there was the constitution. Firstly, the proportion of representation from each party was so little that it was impossible for one party to come to power thus creating confusion and delays in decreeing laws due to the diversity in views. This disorganisation led to there being 6 different Chancellors during the period of 1924-28, each pertaining their own different ideologies in terms of law and order. Along with a Chancellor the Weimar Republic had a President. Article 48 allowed the President immense power to govern creating an almost dictatorial regime. If the President was not pleased the Chancellor, he had the power to remove him from position and appoint someone of his wishes. This meant that the government was restricted to the President's ideologies, which further restricted free will and democracy, for example, Hindenburg, who was appointed as President in 1925, was a strict conservative rightist and therefore Germany remained mostly a strict rightist country under his power. In 1930 Hindenburg appointed Bruning as chancellor and agreed to sign 'presidential emergency decrees' under Article 48 if the government faced opposition in the Reichstag. Therefore, under Hindenburg's governing and Bruning's chancellorship the government no longer functioned democratically as Bruning relied on the president's emergency powers to push through the legislation he desired. Hindenburg's policies were collapsing the German democracy as he represented an abuse of the constitution's emergency powers, which were initially meant to protect the democratic functioning of the constitution, not to disrupt it. Moreover, Hindenburg's failing energy and senility (he was 85 when he got re-elected in 1932) ...read more.

Conclusion

* American influence -technology * Weimar culture o Art- Dadaism. Ex, George Grosz o Architecture. Ex, Walter Gropius o Philosophy. Ex, Thomas Mann o Cinema. Ex, Fritz Lang No: Political disillusionment in Germany: * Extremist parties still making an impact on the street. Fighting between Nazi/SA and KPD/paramilitary Red fighting league. Friekorps. Deaths-riots * Liberal party DDP-Lost ground therefore, M/C became polarised * Late 1920's Centre Party move to the Right and some of its leaders like Bruning began to favour authoritarianism. * 6 Weimar govt. between 1924-29= increases instability * PR system: instead of co-operating, parties stuck by their political ideology. Therefore, no chancellor could hold a govt. together for more than 2 years. * Pubic unhappy with PR system because voters were voting for the party rather than the individual deputy. * Parties divided. Even the SPD was not in agreement. * Growth of narrow sectional interest parties. Gained a total of 78 deputies at their peak in 1930. Advocated narrow interests e.g. compensation from the losers of hyperinflation. * Lacked a charismatic leader. People still believed in the "stab in the back" ideology. * Hindenberg appointed President in 1925. Conservative Right. * Elite still opposed to democracy e.g. Army, Church and teachers. * Instable govt. too many political parties and the need to form coalitions which proved short-lived- electoral system. * Extremists parties irreconcilable divisions. * Dependant on foreign economies- in-flow from USA * Comprehensive unemployment insurance of 1927 * Agricultural priced decreases - 1927 * November criminals Historiography ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Assess the impact of the Treaty of Versailles on Germany, 1919-1930.

    The currency of Germany slowly decreases in value therefore, the French want goods instead. o Germany's economy had been stretched to its limit too, it is important to understand that not only was Germany now responsible for reconstructing her own economy but also to pay for the reparation.

  2. Nazi Germany

    - In the late 1930s the Nazis needed more women workers b/c there was just a few unemployed men and workers were still necessary Did Germans gain from Nazi rule ??? Economic recovery & rearmament Hitler came to power b/c he promised he will solve the country's main problems -

  1. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    Italian foreign policies; hence, Britain was faced with the prospect of a variety of challenges to its interests and to international order. Appeasement was Britain's response. * The British government was preoccupied with resolving the economic problems caused by the Wall Street Crash thus leading to rearmament was delayed until 1934.

  2. How Successful was the Dayton Peace Agreement in Bringing Sustainable Governance to Bosnia and ...

    After the first state elections since the war stopped the same nationalistic parties that were also the main warring sides won 86% of the vote. The Bosniak SDA (party of democratic action) 45.2%, The Serb SDS (Serb democratic party) 21.4%, the Croat HDZ (Croat democratic union)

  1. To what extent can Berlin or Vienna can be held accountable for the start ...

    the Triple Entente and thus gain a great diplomatic victory or a global European war that would fulfill Germany's expansionist aims and gain her a 'a place in the sun' (Weltpolitik). In other words, victory was possible either on the field of battle or diplomatically.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Weimar Republic

    However, the many changes in the government such as the chancellors, made the republic look weak, fail to gain support and led the people turn to Hitler as their only escape. The economy of Germany was another situation that the Republic had to face.

  1. To what extent were economic conditions the predominant factor in the proliferation and manifestation ...

    radical wings of the political spectrum, characterized by demagogy as well as physical violence and racism. Yet an examination appreciative of the crucial aforementioned historical context will reveal that the mentality of the German population was the product of the circumstances in which they lived, and not of an inherent quality.

  2. He brought his country and his people nothing but harm. To what extent do ...

    sufficiently to fund industrial growth, yet at a great cost to both peasant livelihood and lives. Despite from Stalin?s perspective the scheme being a success, the policy had significant limitations that ultimately countered any success it had had. The most significant occurrence of this was the significant lapse in production

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work