• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Castro's Cuba

Extracts from this document...


Prior to Fidel Castro's propulsion to power on January 1st 1959, Cuba was led by Fulgencio Batista, a military commander and dictator when the times required. Batista had ruled the nation from 1940 to 1944, and again from 1952 to 1959, until he was ousted from power. When Batista assumed power in 1952, after staging a coup against Carlos Prio the president at the time, civil unrest ensued and a large Cuban population began to conspire a plan to oust Batista from power. Batista's regime was known to be corrupt - mobsters ruled the island and large scale gambling was approved by Batista himself. Student riots against Batista became common in the mid 1950s. Batista dealt with the demonstrations by using force and violence, often executing innocent civilians. Batista also removed all the political parties, replaced the Cuban congress and strengthened the army and police force. Amidst all the commotion and demonstrations, Cuba under Batista's regime was prosperous. Batista put the sugar stabilization plan in effect, which reduced sugar production, since overproduction was a problem. The tourism industry flourished as many Americans were travelling to Cuba. Although Cuba was doing well under Batista's regime, the people were unhappy and as a result there was political unrest in the country. ...read more.


Throughout this whole period of guerrilla warfare, the key leader was not Castro but a very close friend, Ernesto "Che" Guevara. He had much experience in unfamiliar grounds and knew various tactics as he was a skilled warrior, tactician and teacher. He was the one that understood the importance of settling in the Sierra Maestra mountains and helping the local peasants in exchange for support of any kind. Castro chose guerrilla warfare over many other possible ways firstly because of his ideology of independence; he could not use the Cuban army and certainly not on any external country's army(the negotiations between Batista and Cosme de la Torriente, "El dialogo civico" had ended in the failure of political groups to find a peaceful solution, so peaceful attempts were largely out of the question).. He wanted it to be a revolution led by his future people, a key for their future support in his dreamed government. In addition to this, the USA's policy of placing an arms embargo on Cuba greatly decreased the morale of the army and raised hopes in Castro's men as they knew that without the American spare parts, the Cuban army would not be able to function properly. Also guerrilla warfare kept the state of Cuba in a mild turmoil during these revolutionary years and greatly helped in meddling up Batista's priorities. ...read more.


He was both a nationalist and socialist and had some Marxist and Leninist ideas. At first he was sure to isolate himself from anything that could be assumed as a communist revolution, although he was eventually left with no choice but to declare it communist to gain soviet support in the years that would follow. So indirectly his ideology helped make the revolution what it was. It could also be argued that the policies of the USA actually allowed the Revolution to happen. During the early stages of Castro's rise to power, the USA was not supporting a clear side. It supported both forces: General Fulgencio Batista by sending planes to Cuba in order to exterminate rebel forces, and indirectly Castro. In response to talks between Castro's allies and US government ministers, Castro joined his 26th July movement with the Orthodox party to give an international gloss to his actions, a "civic revolutionary front". Still the US kept supplying weapons to Batista but in an insufficient number that would have never allowed him to win through a military victory. Also, the USA were increasingly despairing of Batista's corruption (for example he "cleared" peasants who were supporting Castro) that for some influential Americans, Castro was looking like a viable, and preferable, alternative. If the USA could have acted to prevent the Castro Revolution, they did not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Rise of Castro and Stalin

    Under Lenin, and later Stalin, the party did not change its communist stance, although constant adaptations were made, such as Lenin's Economic Policies and Stalin's 'Revolution in One Country' policy. Hence the difference in the introduction of communism was that under Stalin, Russia continued the Bolshevik Party's communist stance; whereas

  2. Investigacin Histrica: En qu medida la expropiacin de tierras emprendida durante el gobierno de ...

    Las limitaciones fueron que s�lo se pod�a conocer mediante el libro lo que era el punto de vista del propio general mas no del pueblo ni de la oligarqu�a por lo que no se conoc�a la situaci�n dentro del sector agro y de los campesinos, �nicamente lo que �l dec�a que puede que haya sido subjetivo.

  1. Was the American Revolution Revolutionary?

    The concepts reflect economic issues for a majority of the time because the colonies were not interested in taking political stands against British Parliament. Instead, they were frustrated by Britain's constant desire to limit their ability to prosper. The issues that arose revolved around trade between the colonies and Britain and the acts passed to limit the colonists.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Believed that one mode of production (agriculture and feudalism) had been replaced by industrial production and thus a new elite had emerged. A period of capitalism with the bourgeoisie as the oppressing class would follow. 3. This period would then be ended by a working class revolution which would finally bring the means of production into the hands of the masses.

  1. Explain the USAs policy of containment. How successful was this in Korea, Vietnam and ...

    In 1956 elections were to be held throughout Vietnam, after which it was to be united. However neither side wanted elections and a civil war broke, North Vietnam against South Vietnam. Kennedy, in order to retain US influence in the region, sent US troops to prop up the regime in the South.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    allowed the SU to entrench itself in the region by quickly offering to re-equip Egypt. The SU did not encourage negotiation as this would decrease their influence in the region - Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, Algeria and Yemen severed diplomatic ties with the USA.

  1. Evaluate the successes and failures of Castro as ruler of Cuba.

    Castro succeeded in his aim to be seen as the champion of revolution- soldiers were trained in Cuba and sent to fight in various wars of revolution in Latin America and Africa (mainly dominated by Che Guevara until his death in 1967)

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    To all these demands, U Thant refused since he might have perceived fruitful consequences and therefore, demonstrated his capability to make independent decisions as a Secretary-General. On 24th October, at the Security Council meeting, U Thant proclaimed the contents of the two messages as well as the possible negotiation through

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work